Synthesis and biological response of size-specific, monodisperse drug-silica nanoconjugates.

Drug-containing nanoparticles (NPs) with monodisperse, controlled particle sizes are highly desirable for drug delivery. Accumulating evidence suggests that NPs with sizes less than 50 nm demonstrate superior performance in vitro and in vivo. However, it is difficult to fabricate monodisperse, drug-containing NPs with discrete sizes required for studying and characterizing existing relationships among particle size, biologic processing, and therapeutic functionality. Here, we report a scalable process of fabricating drug-silica conjugated nanoparticles, termed drug-silica nanoconjugates (drug-NCs), which possess monodisperse size distributions and desirable particle sizes as small as 20 nm. We find that 20 nm NCs are superior to their 50 and 200 nm NC analogues by 2-5- and 10-20-fold, respectively, with regard to tumor accumulation and penetration and cellular internalization. These fundamental findings underscore the importance and necessity of further miniaturizing nanomedicine size for optimized drug delivery applications.

[1]  M. Uesaka,et al.  Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[2]  Wenbin Lin,et al.  Polysilsesquioxane nanoparticles for targeted platin-based cancer chemotherapy by triggered release. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  Ryan M. Pearson,et al.  Dendron-mediated self-assembly of highly PEGylated block copolymers: a modular nanocarrier platform. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[4]  Courtney R. Thomas,et al.  Synthesis of biomolecule-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted hydrophobic drug delivery to cancer cells. , 2011, Small.

[5]  Srikanth K. Iyer,et al.  Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. , 2011, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  Hamidreza Ghandehari,et al.  Impact of silica nanoparticle design on cellular toxicity and hemolytic activity. , 2011, ACS nano.

[7]  Scott H. Medina,et al.  N-acetylgalactosamine-functionalized dendrimers as hepatic cancer cell-targeted carriers. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[8]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Aspect ratio determines the quantity of mesoporous silica nanoparticle uptake by a small GTPase-dependent macropinocytosis mechanism. , 2011, ACS nano.

[9]  M. Stevens,et al.  Quantum-dot-based FRET detection of histone acetyltransferase activity. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  Kenneth Vecchio,et al.  Bacterial toxin-triggered drug release from gold nanoparticle-stabilized liposomes for the treatment of bacterial infection. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Chi‐Hwa Wang,et al.  Hollow chitosan–silica nanospheres for doxorubicin delivery to cancer cells with enhanced antitumor effect in vivo , 2011 .

[12]  Dong Chen,et al.  In vivo delivery of silica nanorattle encapsulated docetaxel for liver cancer therapy with low toxicity and high efficacy. , 2010, ACS nano.

[13]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug-delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals. , 2010, Small.

[14]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Engineered design of mesoporous silica nanoparticles to deliver doxorubicin and P-glycoprotein siRNA to overcome drug resistance in a cancer cell line. , 2010, ACS nano.

[15]  Zongxi Li,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles facilitate delivery of siRNA to shutdown signaling pathways in mammalian cells. , 2010, Small.

[16]  Min Suk Shim,et al.  Acid-transforming polypeptide micelles for targeted nonviral gene delivery. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[17]  Vincent M. Rotello,et al.  Tuning Payload Delivery in Tumour Cylindroids using Gold Nanoparticles , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[18]  M Ferrari,et al.  Size and shape effects in the biodistribution of intravascularly injected particles. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[19]  Mina Choi,et al.  The impact of size on tissue distribution and elimination by single intravenous injection of silica nanoparticles. , 2009, Toxicology letters.

[20]  Saji George,et al.  Polyethyleneimine coating enhances the cellular uptake of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and allows safe delivery of siRNA and DNA constructs. , 2009, ACS nano.

[21]  Xiaohu Gao,et al.  Plasmonic fluorescent quantum dots. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[22]  J. Fraser Stoddart,et al.  Mesostructured multifunctional nanoparticles for imaging and drug delivery , 2009 .

[23]  A. Corma,et al.  Organic–Inorganic Nanospheres with Responsive Molecular Gates for Drug Storage and Release , 2009 .

[24]  T. Xia,et al.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. , 2009, Nature materials.

[25]  Jinkyu Lee,et al.  New method to prepare very stable and biocompatible fluorescent silica nanoparticles. , 2009, Chemical communications.

[26]  Warren C W Chan,et al.  Mediating tumor targeting efficiency of nanoparticles through design. , 2009, Nano letters.

[27]  Michael J Sailor,et al.  Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. , 2009, Nature materials.

[28]  K. Finnie,et al.  Biodegradability of sol–gel silica microparticles for drug delivery , 2009 .

[29]  Yanju Wang,et al.  A supramolecular approach for preparation of size-controlled nanoparticles. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[30]  A. Mohs,et al.  Tuning the optical and electronic properties of colloidal nanocrystals by lattice strain. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[31]  Samir Mitragotri,et al.  Physical approaches to biomaterial design. , 2009, Nature materials.

[32]  A. Corma,et al.  Organic-inorganic nanospheres with responsive molecular gates for drug storage and release. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[33]  Monty Liong,et al.  Mesostructured Silica for Optical Functionality, Nanomachines, and Drug Delivery. , 2009, Journal of the American Ceramic Society. American Ceramic Society.

[34]  Michelle Bradbury,et al.  Fluorescent silica nanoparticles with efficient urinary excretion for nanomedicine. , 2009, Nano letters.

[35]  Kemin Wang,et al.  In vivo study of biodistribution and urinary excretion of surface-modified silica nanoparticles. , 2008, Analytical chemistry.

[36]  Mark E. Davis,et al.  Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer , 2008, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[37]  Stephanie E. A. Gratton,et al.  The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  D. Pierce,et al.  Silica Nanoparticles with Continuously Tunable Sizes: Synthesis and Size Effects on Cellular Contrast Imaging , 2008 .

[39]  Warren C W Chan,et al.  Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[40]  Weili Lin,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanospheres as highly efficient MRI contrast agents. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  Sai T Reddy,et al.  Exploiting lymphatic transport and complement activation in nanoparticle vaccines , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[42]  Indrajit Roy,et al.  Organically modified silica nanoparticles with covalently incorporated photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy of cancer. , 2007, Nano letters.

[43]  Monty Liong,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a delivery system for hydrophobic anticancer drugs. , 2007, Small.

[44]  Weili Lin,et al.  Self-assembled hybrid nanoparticles for cancer-specific multimodal imaging. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  Charles R. Martin Nanomedicine: a great first year and, with your help, a bright future ahead , 2007 .

[46]  S. Pun,et al.  Increased nanoparticle penetration in collagenase-treated multicellular spheroids , 2007, International journal of nanomedicine.

[47]  Weili Lin,et al.  Hybrid silica nanoparticles for multimodal imaging. , 2007, Angewandte Chemie.

[48]  V. S. Lin,et al.  Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[49]  Warren C W Chan,et al.  Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. , 2007, Nano letters.

[50]  J. W. Kim,et al.  Size control of silica nanoparticles and their surface treatment for fabrication of dental nanocomposites. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[51]  Robert Langer,et al.  An aptamer-doxorubicin physical conjugate as a novel targeted drug-delivery platform. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[52]  Volker Wagner,et al.  The emerging nanomedicine landscape , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  Ruth Duncan,et al.  Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[54]  J. Richie,et al.  Targeted nanoparticle-aptamer bioconjugates for cancer chemotherapy in vivo. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  M. Dewhirst,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[56]  Weihong Tan,et al.  Watching Silica Nanoparticles Glow in the Biological World , 2006 .

[57]  Victor S-Y Lin,et al.  Stimuli-responsive controlled-release delivery system based on mesoporous silica nanorods capped with magnetic nanoparticles. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[58]  E. Stachowiak,et al.  Organically modified silica nanoparticles: a nonviral vector for in vivo gene delivery and expression in the brain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  M. Ferrari Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[60]  C. Barbé,et al.  Silica Particles: A Novel Drug‐Delivery System , 2004 .

[61]  A. Santoro,et al.  Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[62]  Hao Zeng,et al.  Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[63]  P. Caliceti,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution properties of poly(ethylene glycol)-protein conjugates. , 2003, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[64]  Victor S-Y Lin,et al.  A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based carrier system with chemically removable CdS nanoparticle caps for stimuli-responsive controlled release of neurotransmitters and drug molecules. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  Brian J. Melde,et al.  Hybrid Inorganic–Organic Mesoporous Silicates—Nanoscopic Reactors Coming of Age , 2000 .

[66]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[67]  S. Stewart,et al.  Randomized comparative trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus bleomycin and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. International Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Study Group. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  K. Unger,et al.  The use of porous and surface modified silicas as drug delivery and stabilizing agents , 1983 .

[69]  W. Stöber,et al.  Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range , 1968 .