The driver assistance system part of the cognitive vehicle design can prevent rear, lateral and other collisions by using a collision warning system that integrates intelligent technology and human factors. To be effective, such a system should be able to analyse driving states including driver distraction and driver intent, assess the likelihood of collisions by working with surrogate safety measures and issue warnings to the driver. This study presents a longitudinal and lateral collision warning model that allows the inclusion of key surrogate safety measures such as distance between vehicles in longitudinal vehicle-following mode or envelopes of vehicles in the lateral direction during lane migration/change/merge movements. The model can take into account values of driver distraction and driver intent variables obtained on-line or from off-line devices. The formulation is also applicable to time-to-crash surrogate safety measure. A pattern recognition method is used for the identification of pre-crash condition while minimising false alarms. The surrogate safety model is presented and illustrative examples are provided. The surrogate safety measure-based warning system is mainly intended for on-line use in actual driving conditions. In addition, it can be used in driving simulators or for off-line safety studies in association with microsimulators of traffic.
[1]
G. Rigoll,et al.
The BMW SURF Project: A Contribution to the Research on Cognitive Vehicles
,
2007,
2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.
[2]
Klaus Henning,et al.
The "Cognitive Car": A Roadmap for Research Issues in the Automotive Sector
,
2006
.
[3]
Ata M Khan.
Design of Adaptive Longitudinal Control for Cognitive Connected Vehicle
,
2011
.
[4]
Larry Head,et al.
Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models
,
2003
.
[5]
Anup Doshi,et al.
Lane change intent prediction for driver assistance: On-road design and evaluation
,
2011,
2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).
[6]
Firas Lethaus,et al.
Do eye movements reflect driving manoeuvres
,
2006
.
[7]
W G Najm,et al.
Safety assessment of a rear-end crash avoidance system
,
2006
.
[8]
Robert J. Miller,et al.
A NEW PARADIGM FOR REAR-END CRASH PREVENTION DRIVING PERFORMANCE
,
2001
.
[9]
Thomas A. Dingus,et al.
Evaluating the Relationship Between Near-Crashes and Crashes: Can Near-Crashes Serve as a Surrogate Safety Metric for Crashes?
,
2010
.
[10]
Young-Jun Kweon,et al.
Development of crash prediction models using real time safety surrogate measures
,
2008
.