Fully porous 3D printed titanium femoral stem to reduce stress‐shielding following total hip arthroplasty

Current hip replacement femoral implants are made of fully solid materials which all have stiffness considerably higher than that of bone. This mechanical mismatch can cause significant bone resorption secondary to stress shielding, which can lead to serious complications such as peri‐prosthetic fracture during or after revision surgery. In this work, a high strength fully porous material with tunable mechanical properties is introduced for use in hip replacement design. The implant macro geometry is based off of a short stem taper‐wedge implant compatible with minimally invasive hip replacement surgery. The implant micro‐architecture is fine‐tuned to locally mimic bone tissue properties which results in minimum bone resorption secondary to stress shielding. We present a systematic approach for the design of a 3D printed fully porous hip implant that encompasses the whole activity spectrum of implant development, from concept generation, multiscale mechanics of porous materials, material architecture tailoring, to additive manufacturing, and performance assessment via in vitro experiments in composite femurs. We show that the fully porous implant with an optimized material micro‐structure can reduce the amount of bone loss secondary to stress shielding by 75% compared to a fully solid implant. This result also agrees with those of the in vitro quasi‐physiological experimental model and the corresponding finite element model for both the optimized fully porous and fully solid implant. These studies demonstrate the merit and the potential of tuning material architecture to achieve a substantial reduction of bone resorption secondary to stress shielding. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1774–1783, 2017.

[1]  D. Pasini,et al.  High-strength porous biomaterials for bone replacement: A strategy to assess the interplay between cell morphology, mechanical properties, bone ingrowth and manufacturing constraints. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  L. Grassi,et al.  Extracting accurate strain measurements in bone mechanics: A critical review of current methods. , 2015, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[3]  Hassan El-Hofy,et al.  Femoral hip stem with additively manufactured cellular structures , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences (IECBES).

[4]  M. Stanford,et al.  A numerical investigation into the influence of the properties of cobalt chrome cellular structures on the load transfer to the periprosthetic femur following total hip arthroplasty. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  P. Jalovaara,et al.  A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding , 2001, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  P. Banaszkiewicz Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Total Hip Replacement. A Standard System of Terminology for Reporting Results , 2014 .

[7]  S. Ahmadia,et al.  Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells , 2014 .

[8]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Mechanical properties of lattice materials via asymptotic homogenization and comparison with alternative homogenization methods , 2013 .

[9]  M. Stanford,et al.  The potential application of a Cobalt Chrome Molybdenum femoral stem with functionally graded orthotropic structures manufactured using Laser Melting technologies. , 2013, Medical hypotheses.

[10]  P. Cripton,et al.  Development of an inertia-driven model of sideways fall for detailed study of femur fracture mechanics. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[11]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  The Fatigue Design of a Bone Preserving Hip Implant With Functionally Graded Cellular Material , 2013 .

[12]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Fatigue design of a mechanically biocompatible lattice for a proof-of-concept femoral stem. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[13]  P. McHugh,et al.  Micromotion and friction evaluation of a novel surface architecture for improved primary fixation of cementless orthopaedic implants. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[14]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Fatigue design of lattice materials via computational mechanics: Application to lattices with smooth transitions in cell geometry , 2013 .

[15]  L. Murr,et al.  Compression deformation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with cellular structures fabricated by electron beam melting. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[16]  Damiano Pasini,et al.  Multiscale design and multiobjective optimization of orthopedic hip implants with functionally graded cellular material. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[17]  D. Pasini,et al.  Multiscale Design and Multiobjective Optimization of Orthopaedic Cellular Hip Implants , 2011, DAC 2011.

[18]  João Folgado,et al.  Bone Implant Design Using Optimization Methods , 2010 .

[19]  D. Berry,et al.  Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  O. Harrysson,et al.  In vitro evaluation of a low-modulus mesh canine prosthetic hip stem. , 2010, American journal of veterinary research.

[21]  L. Fedrizzi,et al.  Characterization of cellular solids in Ti6Al4V for orthopaedic implant applications: Trabecular titanium. , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[22]  L. Murr,et al.  Next-generation biomedical implants using additive manufacturing of complex, cellular and functional mesh arrays , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Shivakumar Raman,et al.  Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM). , 2010, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[24]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  Survivorship of a Low-stiffness Extensively Porous-coated Femoral Stem at 10 Years , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  Bernd-Arno Behrens,et al.  Numerical Investigations of the Strain-Adaptive Bone Remodeling in the Prosthetic Pelvis , 2010 .

[26]  Lewis Mullen,et al.  Selective laser melting: a unit cell approach for the manufacture of porous, titanium, bone in-growth constructs, suitable for orthopedic applications. II. Randomized structures. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[27]  Hans Martin Kjer,et al.  Evaluation of surface registration algorithms for PET motion correction , 2010 .

[28]  A. Kalamkarov,et al.  Asymptotic Homogenization of Composite Materials and Structures , 2009 .

[29]  S. Gupta,et al.  A numerical study of failure mechanisms in the cemented resurfaced femur: Effects of interface characteristics and bone remodelling , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[30]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[31]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  The effect of the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  A. Heiner Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  A new short uncemented, proximally fixed anatomic femoral implant with a prominent lateral flare: design rationals and study design of an international clinical trial , 2008, BMC musculoskeletal disorders.

[34]  Zdenek Horak,et al.  Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[35]  C J Wirth,et al.  Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[36]  Zdenek Horak,et al.  Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[37]  João Folgado,et al.  Three-dimensional shape optimization of hip prostheses using a multicriteria formulation , 2007 .

[38]  W. Taylor,et al.  Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  New femoral designs: do they influence stress shielding? , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[40]  V. Goldberg,et al.  Clinical and histologic results related to a low-modulus composite total hip replacement stem. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[41]  Hans-Jerker Lundberg,et al.  Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: A long-term evaluation with DEXA , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[42]  Xinwei Wang,et al.  On selection of repeated unit cell model and application of unified periodic boundary conditions in micro-mechanical analysis of composites , 2006 .

[43]  G Bergmann,et al.  Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  R. Trebše,et al.  Poor results from the isoelastic total hip replacement , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[45]  M. Hackenbroch,et al.  The Cenos hollow stem in total hip arthroplasty: first experiences in a prospective study , 2004, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[46]  C. Engh,et al.  Clinical Consequences of Stress Shielding After Porous-Coated Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[47]  A. Leali Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[48]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A Low Stiffness Composite Biologically Fixed Prosthesis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[49]  J. S. Kim,et al.  Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. An in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[50]  L Cristofolini,et al.  In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[51]  D R Sumner,et al.  Functional adaptation and ingrowth of bone vary as a function of hip implant stiffness. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  C. Engh,et al.  Total Hip Arthroplasty: Concerns With Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Components , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[53]  C. Engh,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Consequences of Stress-Shielding after Total Hip Arthroplasty without Cement* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[54]  T. Nicholas,et al.  On the use of the Goodman diagram for high cycle fatigue design , 1996 .

[55]  Behrooz Hassani,et al.  A direct method to derive the boundary conditions of the homogenization equation for symmetric cells , 1996 .

[56]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[57]  H Weinans,et al.  Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling , 1992, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[58]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A comparison of homogenization and standard mechanics analyses for periodic porous composites , 1992 .

[59]  Jan Herman Kuiper,et al.  Numerical optimization of hip-prosthetic stem material , 1992 .

[60]  C. Engh,et al.  Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[61]  C Kranz,et al.  [Effects of hollow shaft endoprosthesis on stress distribution in cortical bone]. , 1990, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[62]  R Poss,et al.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[63]  H. Grootenboer,et al.  Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[64]  R. Bombelli,et al.  Cementless Isoelastic RM Total HIP Prosthesis , 1982, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[65]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[66]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[67]  A Chamay,et al.  Mechanical influences in bone remodeling. Experimental research on Wolff's law. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[68]  E. M. Wu,et al.  A General Theory of Strength for Anisotropic Materials , 1971 .