IntroductionIn today's complex and rapidly changing business environment, converging technology and business strategy is crucial for sustainability of the companies, specifically in developing economies. One of the main drivers of facilitating explorative and revolutionary technology innovations is corporate governance mechanisms, including ownership structure of the companies.Innovation and technology are one of the main aspects in which foreign-owned and domestically owned firms differ in European and non-European countries [Dachs, Peters 2013]. Ebersberger and Loof [2005] analyzed the innovation behavior and performance of foreign owned firms in the Nordic region, and found that in Norway, foreign-owned firms have a larger propensity to patent than domestically owned firms. These results does not hold for other Nordic countries [Ebersberger, Loof 2005]. Consistently, Vishwasroa and Bosshardt [2001] argue that technological achievement is essential for the long-run economic growth and foreign-owned firms are more likely to adopt new technology in India. Diaz-Diaz et. al. [2008] reports that there is no significant difference between the innovation of foreign and domestic firms for Spanish sample. Since different results are found for different countries, evidence from more countries are necessary to contribute to the literature that analyzes the impact of foreign ownership on innovation. Considering relatively scarce resources (micro and macro) devoted to innovative technology in emerging markets, the necessity of technological investment and transfer by foreign partners is crucial. Thus, we mainly focus on foreign ownership and technology achievement relationship in emerging market context.Literature generally uses RD RD the dominance of foreign-owned firms in the largest firm size group is the main factor contributing to the gap in the percentage of innovators between foreign-owned firms and domestic firms. …
[1]
Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo,et al.
Analysing patent landscapes in plant biotechnology and new plant breeding techniques
,
2012,
Transgenic Research.
[2]
Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.
The effect of technological knowledge assets on performance: The innovative choice in Spanish firms
,
2008
.
[3]
M. Falk.
Effects of Foreign Ownership On Innovation Activities: Empirical Evidence for Twelve European Countries
,
2008,
National Institute Economic Review.
[4]
A. Gambardella,et al.
The Market for Patents in Europe
,
2006
.
[5]
B. Ebersberger,et al.
Innovation Behaviour andProductivity Performance in the Nordic RegionDoes Foreign Ownership Matter
,
2005
.
[6]
S. Redding,et al.
Foreign Ownership and Productivity: New Evidence from the Service Sector and the R&D Lab
,
2004
.
[7]
William D. Bosshardt,et al.
Foreign ownership and technology adoption: evidence from Indian firms
,
2001
.
[8]
J. Loundes,et al.
Foreign Ownership, Foreign Competition and Innovation in Australian Enterprises
,
2000
.
[9]
Stephen Roper,et al.
The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects
,
1999
.
[10]
M. A. Hamilton,et al.
Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method for Estimating Median Lethal Concentrations in Toxicity Bioassays
,
1977
.
[11]
B. Dachs,et al.
Innovation, Employment Growth, and Foreign Ownership of Firms - A European Perspective
,
2013
.