Characterization of extracellular vesicles and artificial nanoparticles with four orthogonal single-particle analysis platforms

We compared four orthogonal technologies for sizing, counting, and phenotyping of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and synthetic particles. The platforms were: single-particle interferometric reflectance imaging sensing (SP-IRIS) with fluorescence, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) with fluorescence, microfluidic resistive pulse sensing (MRPS), and nanoflow cytometry measurement (NFCM). Results were compared with standard EV characterization techniques such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Western blot (WB). EVs from the human T lymphocyte line H9 (high CD81, low CD63) and the promonocytic line U937 (low CD81, high CD63) were separated from culture conditioned medium (CCM) by differential ultracentrifugation (dUC) or a combination of ultrafiltration (UF) and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and characterized per MISEV2018 guidelines. Mixtures of synthetic particles (silica and polystyrene spheres) with known sizes and/or concentrations were also tested. MRPS and NFCM returned similar particle counts, while NTA detected counts approximately one order of magnitude lower for EVs, but not for synthetic particles. SP-IRIS events could not be used to estimate particle concentrations. For sizing, SP-IRIS, MRPS, and NFCM returned similar size profiles, with smaller sizes predominating (per power law distribution), but with sensitivity typically dropping off below diameters of 60 nm. NTA detected a population of particles with a mode diameter greater than 100 nm. Additionally, SP-IRIS, MRPS, and NFCM were able to identify at least three of four distinct size populations in a mixture of silica or polystyrene nanoparticles. Finally, for tetraspanin phenotyping, the SP-IRIS platform in fluorescence mode and NFCM were able to detect at least two markers on the same particle. Based on the results of this study, we can draw conclusions about existing single-particle analysis capabilities that may be useful for EV biomarker development and mechanistic studies.

[1]  Joshua A Welsh,et al.  Small Particle Fluorescence and Light Scatter Calibration Using FCMPASS Software , 2020, Current protocols in cytometry.

[2]  Rienk Nieuwland,et al.  Methods for Separation and Characterization of Extracellular Vesicles: Results of a Worldwide Survey Performed by the ISEV Rigor and Standardization Subcommittee , 2020, Cells.

[3]  Peter Horak,et al.  FCMPASS Software Aids Extracellular Vesicle Light Scatter Standardization , 2020, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[4]  Jennifer C. Jones,et al.  Towards defining reference materials for extracellular vesicle size, concentration, refractive index and epitope abundance , 2020, 2004.09428.

[5]  J. Handa,et al.  Release of extracellular vesicle miR-494-3p by ARPE-19 cells with impaired mitochondria. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects.

[6]  Jennifer C. Jones,et al.  Towards defining reference materials for measuring extracellular vesicle refractive index, epitope abundance, size and concentration , 2020, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[7]  Romaric Lacroix,et al.  MIFlowCyt-EV: a framework for standardized reporting of extracellular vesicle flow cytometry experiments , 2020, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[8]  Lesley Cheng,et al.  Influence of species and processing parameters on recovery and content of brain tissue-derived extracellular vesicles , 2020, bioRxiv.

[9]  P. Ivanov,et al.  Stable tRNA halves can be sorted into extracellular vesicles and delivered to recipient cells in a concentration-dependent manner , 2019, RNA biology.

[10]  Xiaomei Yan,et al.  Quality and efficiency assessment of six extracellular vesicle isolation methods by nano-flow cytometry , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[11]  S. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Biological membranes in EV biogenesis, stability, uptake, and cargo transfer: an ISEV position paper arising from the ISEV membranes and EVs workshop , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[12]  C. Genoud,et al.  Systematic characterization of extracellular vesicle sorting domains and quantification at the single molecule – single vesicle level by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and single particle imaging , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[13]  J. Lötvall,et al.  DNA analysis of low- and high-density fractions defines heterogeneous subpopulations of small extracellular vesicles based on their DNA cargo and topology , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[14]  C. Théry,et al.  Extracellular vesicles or exosomes? On primacy, precision, and popularity influencing a choice of nomenclature , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[15]  I. Fournier,et al.  Proteomic characterisation of leech microglia extracellular vesicles (EVs): comparison between differential ultracentrifugation and Optiprep™ density gradient isolation , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[16]  M. Hallek,et al.  Extracellular vesicle measurements with nanoparticle tracking analysis – An accuracy and repeatability comparison between NanoSight NS300 and ZetaView , 2019, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[17]  Jing Xu,et al.  Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines , 2018, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.

[18]  Su Chul Jang,et al.  Subpopulations of extracellular vesicles and their therapeutic potential. , 2018, Molecular aspects of medicine.

[19]  M. Paulaitis,et al.  Dynamic Scaling of Exosome Sizes. , 2018, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[20]  Zhibin Li,et al.  Protein Profiling and Sizing of Extracellular Vesicles from Colorectal Cancer Patients via Flow Cytometry. , 2018, ACS nano.

[21]  Wyatt N Vreeland,et al.  Using Image Attributes to Assure Accurate Particle Size and Count Using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. , 2017, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  C. Théry,et al.  Why the need and how to approach the functional diversity of extracellular vesicles , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Patrizia Agostinis,et al.  EV-TRACK: transparent reporting and centralizing knowledge in extracellular vesicle research , 2017, Nature Methods.

[24]  Paolo Bettotti,et al.  Digital Detection of Exosomes by Interferometric Imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Joanne Lannigan,et al.  Analytical challenges of extracellular vesicle detection: A comparison of different techniques , 2016, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[26]  A. Hill,et al.  Techniques used for the isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles: results of a worldwide survey , 2016, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[27]  Elmar L. Gool,et al.  Recent developments in the nomenclature, presence, isolation, detection and clinical impact of extracellular vesicles , 2016, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[28]  Á. Kittel,et al.  Differential detergent sensitivity of extracellular vesicle subpopulations. , 2015, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[29]  J. Meldolesi,et al.  Ectosomes and exosomes: shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. , 2015, Trends in cell biology.

[30]  A. Brisson,et al.  High-speed centrifugation induces aggregation of extracellular vesicles , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[31]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Biological properties of extracellular vesicles and their physiological functions , 2015, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[32]  T. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Refractive index determination of nanoparticles in suspension using nanoparticle tracking analysis. , 2014, Nano letters.

[33]  I. Sargent,et al.  Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing , 2014, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[34]  R. Nieuwland,et al.  Single-step isolation of extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography , 2014, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[35]  J. Vandesompele,et al.  The impact of disparate isolation methods for extracellular vesicles on downstream RNA profiling , 2014, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[36]  Chris Gardiner,et al.  Measurement of refractive index by nanoparticle tracking analysis reveals heterogeneity in extracellular vesicles , 2014, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[37]  Matt Trau,et al.  A comparative study of submicron particle sizing platforms: accuracy, precision and resolution analysis of polydisperse particle size distributions. , 2013, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[38]  W. Clem Karl,et al.  An Interferometric Reflectance Imaging Sensor for Point of Care Viral Diagnostics , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  Paul J. Harrison,et al.  Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis , 2011, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[40]  Bernd Giebel,et al.  Characterisation of exosomes derived from human cells by nanoparticle tracking analysis and scanning electron microscopy. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[41]  Erkki Ruoslahti,et al.  A high-throughput label-free nanoparticle analyser. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[42]  M Selim Unlü,et al.  Label-free multiplexed virus detection using spectral reflectance imaging. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[43]  I. Nikolov,et al.  Analysis of the dispersion of optical plastic materials , 2007 .

[44]  Aled Clayton,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes from Cell Culture Supernatants and Biological Fluids , 2006, Current protocols in cell biology.

[45]  Marta Ibisate,et al.  Refractive Index Properties of Calcined Silica Submicrometer Spheres , 2002 .

[46]  L A Herzenberg,et al.  Correlation of Functional Properties of Human Lymphoid Cell Subsets and Surface Marker Phenotypes Using Multiparameter Analysis and Flow Cytometry , 1983, Immunological reviews.

[47]  B. Giebel,et al.  Methods to Analyze EVs. , 2017, Methods in molecular biology.