Collagen-covered versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a comparison of tourniquet times

[1]  J A Skinner,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  A. Cosgarea,et al.  Neurovascular Complications of Knee Arthroscopy , 2002, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  M. Friedman,et al.  Arthroscopy--"no-problem surgery". An analysis of complications in two thousand six hundred and forty cases. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  A A Sapega,et al.  Optimizing tourniquet application and release times in extremity surgery. A biochemical and ultrastructural study. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  L. Klenerman.  Tourniquet paralysis. , 1983, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume.

[8]  L. Klenerman.  Tourniquet Time — how Long? , 1980, The Hand.