Effect of inclination angle and fill ratio on geyser boiling phenomena in a two-phase closed thermosiphon – Experimental investigation

Abstract Geyser boiling is a complex phenomenon which may occur in heat pipes causing high temperature and pressure oscillation leading to noticeable vibration. Therefore, understanding of such process is essential to improve heat pipes thermal performance and avoid damage. In this experimental study, a comprehensive investigation of several parameters on the characteristics of the geyser boiling has been conducted during the operation of two-phase closed thermosiphon (TPCT) using water as the working fluid. The effect of different inclination angles (90, 60, 30 and 10°) at various fill ratios defined as volume of liquid in the evaporator to the volume of the evaporator (25%, 65% and 100%) on the geyser boiling has been investigated at a broad range of heat load and for various mass flow rates and inlet temperatures of the cooling water. These important parameters have been examined to report the occurrence and period of the geyser effect at each heat input. The results showed that the orientation and the liquid charge have a significant impact on the occurrence and period of the geyser boiling at low and high heat inputs. For example, at a fill ratio of 100%, the geyser boiling occurs at a lower heat input compared with that for fill ratios 25%, 65% at all inclination angles, while it happens at a higher heat load at a low inclination 10° compared with other angles at all fill ratios. In addition, at high input energies, it almost disappears at orientations of 90 and 60° for all liquid charges. Also, comparing with fill ratios of 25% and 65%, a shorter period is observed for a fill ratio of 100% at angles of 90, 30 and 10°, whereas it is longer at 60° and low heat inputs. This work highlights the effects of the operating conditions on geyser boiling in heat pipes.

[1]  H.M.S. Hussein,et al.  Theoretical and experimental investigation of wickless heat pipes flat plate solar collector with cross flow heat exchanger , 2007 .

[2]  C. Casarosa,et al.  The geyser effect in a two-phase thermosyphon , 1983 .

[3]  Tsung-Yi Yang,et al.  A novel flat polymer heat pipe with thermal via for cooling electronic devices , 2015 .

[4]  N. Pratinthong,et al.  A two-phase closed thermosyphon with an adiabatic section using a flexible hose and R-134a filling , 2016 .

[5]  W. Srimuang,et al.  Comparative heat transfer characteristics of a flat two-phase closed thermosyphon (FTPCT) and a conventional two-phase closed thermosyphon (CTPCT) , 2010 .

[6]  S. H. Noie.  Heat transfer characteristics of a two-phase closed thermosyphon , 2005 .

[7]  M. Khoshnoodi,et al.  Effect of Inclination Angle and Filling Ratio on Thermal Performance of a Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon under Normal Operating Conditions , 2007 .

[8]  N. Putra,et al.  Visualization of the boiling phenomenon inside a heat pipe using neutron radiography , 2015 .

[9]  Khalid A. Joudi,et al.  Computer simulation of a two phase thermosyphon solar domestic hot water heating system , 1999 .

[10]  J.L.G. Oliveira,et al.  Geyser boiling phenomenon in two-phase closed loop-thermosyphons , 2017 .

[11]  Hussam Jouhara,et al.  Three-dimensional CFD simulation of Geyser boiling in a two-phase closed thermosyphon , 2016 .

[12]  A. Kianifar,et al.  Investigation of Geyser Boiling Phenomenon in a Two-Phase Closed Thermosyphon , 2009 .

[13]  Reza Hosseini,et al.  Experimental investigation of effective parameters and correlation of geyser boiling in a two-phase closed thermosyphon , 2010 .

[14]  Tsing-Fa Lin,et al.  Experimental investigation of geyser boiling in an annular two-phase closed thermosyphon , 1995 .

[15]  L. Wrobel,et al.  Heat pipe based systems - Advances and applications , 2017 .

[16]  S. L. Abreu,et al.  An experimental study of two-phase closed thermosyphons for compact solar domestic hot-water systems , 2004 .

[17]  A. Franco,et al.  Unsteady experimental and numerical analysis of a two-phase closed thermosyphon at different filling ratios , 2017 .

[18]  Engin Gedik,et al.  Experimental investigation of the thermal performance of a two-phase closed thermosyphon at different operating conditions , 2016 .

[19]  K. Fukuda,et al.  An experimental study on the mechanism of geysering in a closed two-phase thermosyphon , 1995 .

[20]  Yong Tang,et al.  Experimental investigation of the thermal performance of heat pipes with double-ended heating and middle-cooling , 2017 .

[21]  Alessandro Franco,et al.  Two-phase closed thermosyphons: A review of studies and solar applications , 2016 .

[22]  G. Longo,et al.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of a heat pipe heat exchanger operating with a low global warming potential refrigerant , 2014 .

[23]  Anthony J. Robinson,et al.  Experimental investigation of small diameter two-phase closed thermosyphons charged with water, FC-84, FC-77 and FC-3283 , 2010 .

[24]  Thanaphol Sukchana,et al.  Effect of Filling Ratios and Adiabatic Length on Thermal Efficiency of Long Heat Pipe Filled with R-134a , 2013 .

[25]  Hasna Louahlia-Gualous,et al.  Experimental investigation of thermosyphon loop thermal performance , 2014 .

[26]  A. F. Akon,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF HEAT PIPE FOR DIFFERENT WORKING FLUIDS AND FILL RATIOS , 2011 .

[27]  Teruo Sawada,et al.  Heat transfer performance of an inclined two-phase closed thermosyphon , 1983 .

[28]  Limin Qiu,et al.  Investigation on the effect of filling ratio on the steady-state heat transfer performance of a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon , 2008 .

[29]  Raya Al-Dadah,et al.  Numerical investigation of effect of fill ratio and inclination angle on a thermosiphon heat pipe thermal performance , 2016 .

[30]  H. Hussein,et al.  Performance of wickless heat pipe flat plate solar collectors having different pipes cross sections geometries and filling ratios , 2006 .

[31]  C. Romestant,et al.  Performance of a cylindrical wicked heat pipe used in solar collectors: Numerical approach with Lattice Boltzmann method , 2017 .