United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: a roadmap for change

Purpose of review This study considers the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a tool for promoting the full social inclusion of people with a mental or intellectual disability. Recent findings The United Nations Convention has ushered in a new era of discourse that moves beyond a consideration of individual impairments, to focus on the social and environmental barriers that prevent full and effective social participation of people with disabilities. It provides an important social justice framework to guide and integrate disability policy within and across countries. In order to realize its potential, the mental health community must now actively develop a new disability discourse – one that moves beyond the traditional focus on negative protections, such as against forced confinement or coercive treatment, to one that examines the services and supports that are needed to allow people who have a mental illness to become fully functioning members of society. To meet the monitoring requirements of the Convention, the mental health community must actively seek population data to assess the nature of prejudice and discrimination experienced by people with a mental illness. An approach used by Statistics Canada is provided as one such example. Summary The United Nations Convention is an important roadmap for change, which can be used to shift current mental health discourse from a discussion emphasizing the protection of negative rights, such as from involuntary detention or coerced treatment, to one emphasizing social rights and civic participation.

[1]  G. Griffo,et al.  Human Rights, UN Convention, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: Collecting Data on Persons with Disabilities? , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  B. Osimani,et al.  Disability, Human Rights, and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: Systematic Review , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  G. Llewellyn,et al.  Eligibility, the ICF and the UN Convention: Australian perspectives , 2011, BMC public health.

[4]  J. Bickenbach,et al.  Monitoring the United Nation’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: data and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2011, BMC public health.

[5]  Paul Harpur,et al.  Time to Be Heard: How Advocates Can Use the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to Drive Change , 2011 .

[6]  C. Ryan One Flu Over The Cuckoo’s Nest: Comparing Legislated Coercive Treatment for Mental Illness with that for Other Illness , 2011 .

[7]  M. Perlin "With Faces Hidden While the Walls Were Tightening": Applying International Human Rights Standards to Forensic Psychology , 2011 .

[8]  H. Stuart,et al.  Social inclusion and mental health , 2010, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[9]  L. Jongbloed Disability Policy in Canada , 2003 .

[10]  Rosemary Kayess,et al.  Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities , 2008 .

[11]  J. Madans,et al.  Measuring disability and monitoring the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: the work of the Washington Group on Disability Statistics , 2011, BMC public health.