Achieving Empathy and Engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research

Phenomenography is a methodology which has been quietly influential in research on higher education, having been the basis of many studies of approaches to learning and student understandings of a wide range of concepts in a variety of disciplines. There is a need to clarify important aspects of the methodology so that it can be used with increasing effectiveness. This article seeks to contribute to the discussion and clarification of the phenomenographic research approach in two ways. Firstly, it is argued that phenomenography would benefit from a more rigorous consideration of how to engage with the student's lived experience. Secondly, drawing on that discussion, the article sets out a series of guidelines for the conduct of phenomenographic research, and demonstrates how these might be achieved in practice by drawing on the experience of two higher education research studies: one into students' experiences of cheating and the other into lecturers' and students' experiences of the teaching and learning of accounting.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[2]  Validity and Reliability from a Phenomenological Perspective , 1988 .

[3]  Noel Entwistle,et al.  Introduction: Phenomenography in Higher Education , 1997 .

[4]  P. Ashworth.  Presuppose Nothing! the Suspension of Assumptions in Phenomenological Psychological Methodology , 1996 .

[5]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[6]  P. Ashworth.  "Bracketing" in phenomenology: Renouncing assumptions in hearing about student cheating , 1999 .

[7]  Ursula Lucas,et al.  What is the ‘World’ of Phenomenography? , 1998 .

[8]  G. Karlsson.  Psychological Qualitative Research from a Phenomenological Perspective , 1993 .

[9]  C. Bruce.  Research students' early experiences of the dissertation literature review , 1994 .

[10]  F. Wertz.  From Everyday To Psychological Description: Analyzing the Moments of a Qualitative Data Analysis , 1983 .

[11]  Lennart Svensson,et al.  The Relation between Categories of Description and an Interview Protocol in a Case of Phenomenographic Research. [Report] 1983:02. , 1983 .

[12]  Jackie Nicholas,et al.  Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university , 1994 .

[13]  Amedeo Giorgi.  Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method , 1985 .

[14]  M. Prosser.  Phenomenography and the Principles and Practices of Learning. , 1993 .

[15]  F. Marton.  Phenomenography — Describing conceptions of the world around us , 1981 .

[16]  Jorgen Sandburg.  Are Phenomenographic Results Reliable , 1997 .

[17]  Michael Prosser,et al.  A phenomenographic study of students' intuitive and conceptual understanding of certain electrical phenomena , 1994 .

[18]  D. Laurillard.  The processes of student learning , 1979 .

[19]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment , 1997 .

[20]  Jörgen Sandbergh,et al.  Are Phenomenographic Results Reliable , 1997 .

[21]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS* , 1976 .