Hydrophobicity and Charge Shape Cellular Metabolite Concentrations

What governs the concentrations of metabolites within living cells? Beyond specific metabolic and enzymatic considerations, are there global trends that affect their values? We hypothesize that the physico-chemical properties of metabolites considerably affect their in-vivo concentrations. The recently achieved experimental capability to measure the concentrations of many metabolites simultaneously has made the testing of this hypothesis possible. Here, we analyze such recently available data sets of metabolite concentrations within E. coli, S. cerevisiae, B. subtilis and human. Overall, these data sets encompass more than twenty conditions, each containing dozens (28-108) of simultaneously measured metabolites. We test for correlations with various physico-chemical properties and find that the number of charged atoms, non-polar surface area, lipophilicity and solubility consistently correlate with concentration. In most data sets, a change in one of these properties elicits a ∼100 fold increase in metabolite concentrations. We find that the non-polar surface area and number of charged atoms account for almost half of the variation in concentrations in the most reliable and comprehensive data set. Analyzing specific groups of metabolites, such as amino-acids or phosphorylated nucleotides, reveals even a higher dependence of concentration on hydrophobicity. We suggest that these findings can be explained by evolutionary constraints imposed on metabolite concentrations and discuss possible selective pressures that can account for them. These include the reduction of solute leakage through the lipid membrane, avoidance of deleterious aggregates and reduction of non-specific hydrophobic binding. By highlighting the global constraints imposed on metabolic pathways, future research could shed light onto aspects of biochemical evolution and the chemical constraints that bound metabolic engineering efforts.

[1]  K. Timmis Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology , 2010 .

[2]  Kristin E. D. Coan,et al.  Promiscuous Aggregate-Based Inhibitors Promote Enzyme Unfolding , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  G. Wächtershäuser,et al.  Before enzymes and templates: theory of surface metabolism. , 1988, Microbiological reviews.

[4]  Jason A. Papin,et al.  Applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[5]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  Co-inertia analysis of amino-acid physico-chemical properties and protein composition with the ADE package , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[6]  Wolfram Liebermeister Predicting Physiological Concentrations of Metabolites from Their Molecular Structure , 2005, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[8]  John P. Overington,et al.  Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[9]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  P. Fürst,et al.  Intracellular free amino acid concentration in human muscle tissue. , 1974, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Olga Khersonsky,et al.  Structure-reactivity studies of serum paraoxonase PON1 suggest that its native activity is lactonase. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[13]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. Analytical equations for overlapping spheres and implications for the hydrophobic effect. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  Pei Yee Ho,et al.  Multiple High-Throughput Analyses Monitor the Response of E. coli to Perturbations , 2007, Science.

[15]  H. Morowitz,et al.  Analysis of the Intermediary Metabolism of a Reductive Chemoautotroph , 2009, The Biological Bulletin.

[16]  A. Danchin,et al.  Homeotopic transformation and the origin of translation. , 1989, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[18]  Nicola Zamboni,et al.  High-throughput quantitative metabolomics: workflow for cultivation, quenching, and analysis of yeast in a multiwell format. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[19]  Angelo D. Favia,et al.  Protein promiscuity and its implications for biotechnology , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  R. J. Williams,et al.  The natural selection of the chemical elements , 1997, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[21]  Igor V. Tetko,et al.  Application of Associative Neural Networks for Prediction of Lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 Program , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Min Zhou,et al.  Understanding noncovalent interactions: ligand binding energy and catalytic efficiency from ligand-induced reductions in motion within receptors and enzymes. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  The specificity of cross‐reactivity: Promiscuous antibody binding involves specific hydrogen bonds rather than nonspecific hydrophobic stickiness , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[24]  G. Fuchs,et al.  Autotrophic carbon fixation in archaea , 2010, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[25]  Joerg M. Buescher,et al.  Tradeoff between enzyme and metabolite efficiency maintains metabolic homeostasis upon perturbations in enzyme capacity , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  B. Shoichet,et al.  High-throughput assays for promiscuous inhibitors , 2005, Nature chemical biology.

[27]  D. Timson,et al.  Water-hydrophobic compound interactions with the microbial cell , 2010 .

[28]  Yuan Zhao,et al.  Computation of Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients by Guiding an Additive Model with Knowledge , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[29]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[30]  K. Luthman,et al.  Effect of molecular charge on intestinal epithelial drug transport: pH-dependent transport of cationic drugs. , 1999, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[31]  Stefan J. Jol,et al.  Differential glucose repression in common yeast strains in response to HXK2 deletion. , 2010, FEMS yeast research.

[32]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[33]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the microbial metabolome by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using uniformly 13C-labeled cell extracts as internal standards. , 2005, Analytical biochemistry.

[34]  K. Luthman,et al.  Virtual screening of intestinal drug permeability. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[35]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Synergy and antagonism of promiscuous inhibition in multiple-compound mixtures. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Chris Morley,et al.  Pybel: a Python wrapper for the OpenBabel cheminformatics toolkit , 2008, Chemistry Central journal.

[37]  Joerg M. Buescher,et al.  Metabolic Fluxes during Strong Carbon Catabolite Repression by Malate in Bacillus subtilis* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  C. Tanford,et al.  Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[40]  S. Abdulnur,et al.  HYDROPHOBIC STACKING OF BASES AND THE SOLVENT DENATURATION OF DNA * , 1964 .