Prediction of Human Brain Activity Using Likelihood Ratio Based Score Fusion

Human brain has a complex structure with the billions of neurons, so it is a difficult and challenging task to predict the behavior of human brain. Different methods and classifiers are used to measure and classify the brain activities with higher accuracy and reliability. In this paper, instead of using mostly used classifier (support vector machine), prediction of the brain activity is done by estimating the match score densities. This method is based on likelihood ratio test which helps in finding the optimal combination of match scores. The distributions of match scores are modeled for different classes based on density score fusion in which the densities of different classes are estimated from the training data set and match scores are found by fusing the estimated densities with the testing data. The fusion is done with the data extracted from distributed activation patterns using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) against a visual task. MVPA is an intense strategy which helps in better understanding of the human brain. The match score-based technique is used in different biometric systems but never been used for the prediction of brain activity. In order to test the performance of proposed method, prediction accuracy is compared with the support vector machine using two data sets of different modalities, one is electroencephalography (EEG) and the other is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The results show that the proposed method predicts the novel data with improved accuracy of 66.1% and 69.3% compared with support vector machine which have 64.15% and 65.7% for fMRI and EEG data sets, respectively.

[1]  M. C. Jones,et al.  A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kernel density estimation , 1991 .

[2]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  A Likelihood Ratio Test for Functional MRI Data Analysis to Account for Colored Noise , 2005, ACIVS.

[3]  Dengfeng Sun,et al.  An air traffic prediction model based on kernel density estimation , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[4]  Saleh A. Alshebeili,et al.  Epileptic MEG Spikes Detection Using Common Spatial Patterns and Linear Discriminant Analysis , 2016, IEEE Access.

[5]  Abdulhamit Subasi,et al.  Automatic recognition of alertness level from EEG by using neural network and wavelet coefficients , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Frequency Recognition in SSVEP-Based BCI using Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[7]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  L. Davis,et al.  Background and foreground modeling using nonparametric kernel density estimation for visual surveillance , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Generalized likelihood ratio tests for complex fMRI data: a Simulation study , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Sparse Bayesian multiway canonical correlation analysis for EEG pattern recognition , 2017, Neurocomputing.

[11]  Srivas Chennu,et al.  Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study , 2011, The Lancet.

[12]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[13]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Identifying Object Categories from Event-Related EEG: Toward Decoding of Conceptual Representations , 2010, PloS one.

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Comparing Classification Methods for Longitudinal fMRI Studies , 2010, Neural Computation.

[15]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  Decoding of visual information from human brain activity: A review of fMRI and EEG studies. , 2015, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[16]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  Göran Falkman,et al.  Anomaly detection in sea traffic - A comparison of the Gaussian Mixture Model and the Kernel Density Estimator , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  M. Genton,et al.  A likelihood ratio test for separability of covariances , 2006 .

[19]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Pattern classification of fMRI data: Applications for analysis of spatially distributed cortical networks , 2014, NeuroImage.

[20]  A. S. Formulation Particle Smoothing in Continuous Time: A Fast Approach via Density Estimation , 2011 .

[21]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning for Obtaining Sparsity of EEG Frequency Bands Based Feature Vectors in Motor Imagery Classification , 2017, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[22]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Classification of EEG for Brain–Computer Interface , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[23]  P. Geethanjali,et al.  DWT Based Detection of Epileptic Seizure From EEG Signals Using Naive Bayes and k-NN Classifiers , 2016, IEEE Access.

[24]  Loris Nanni,et al.  Likelihood ratio based features for a trained biometric score fusion , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Comparison of multivariate classifiers and response normalizations for pattern-information fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  C. D. Kemp,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[29]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Gallant,et al.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity , 2008, Nature.

[31]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Likelihood Ratio-Based Biometric Score Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[32]  Daniel B. Rowe,et al.  A complex way to compute fMRI activation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Learning to Decode Cognitive States from Brain Images , 2004, Machine Learning.

[34]  N. Malmurugan,et al.  Neural classification of lung sounds using wavelet coefficients , 2004, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[35]  Aamir Saeed Malik,et al.  Importance of realignment parameters in fMRI data analysis , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal and Image Processing Applications (ICSIPA).

[36]  Otman A. Basir,et al.  Kernel-Based Optimization for Traffic Density Estimation in ITS , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall).

[37]  Rui Zhang,et al.  An Efficient Frequency Recognition Method Based on Likelihood Ratio Test for SSVEP-Based BCI , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[38]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.