A pressure and concentration dependence of CO2 diffusion in two Australian bituminous coals

Abstract Gas diffusion in coals plays an important role in enhanced coalbed methane production, fugitive gas emissions from coal, and gas release in coal mines. However, a consistent picture of diffusion behaviour in coals is yet to emerge. For example, the adequacy of describing diffusion by a single coefficient is debated. Moreover, some researchers have reported diffusion coefficients as increasing with rising pressure, others report the opposite. This variation may be due to the choice of the model, coal, or experimental conditions. In this study, experimental CO 2 kinetic sorption data was obtained for two Australian bituminous coals over a range of pressure conditions and analysed using three different models. We found that the unipore model , which uses only one characteristic diffusion coefficient, does not adequately capture the sorption kinetics. Using a bidisperse model , two characteristic coefficients can describe the diffusion process. The pressure dependence of the fast diffusion coefficient decreases as the system pressure rises. However, the slow diffusion coefficient is not solely dependent on pressure, but is influenced by additional sorption by the coal, which is introduced during the pressure step. Depending on the amount of gas sorbed in a single sorption step, the magnitude of the slow diffusion component will change. This diffusion coefficient exhibits concentration dependence; it varies depending on whether small or large pressure steps are applied. This suggests that the bidisperse model used is inappropriate for examining the pressure dependence of diffusion coefficients at these conditions. Experiments were repeated using a microporous activated carbon, where CO 2 uptake displayed rapid kinetics, with no evidence of a slower component. This indicates that the slower uptake of CO 2 observed in coal is due to specific properties of the coals. A Fickian diffusion-relaxation model (FDR) developed for studying anomalous diffusion in glassy polymers is proposed instead, ascribing the diffusion in the primary stage to Fickian diffusion, and in the second stage due to slow rearrangement of the coal structure possibly associated with swelling. Additionally, the rapid uptake of gas by the coals (investigated by the model fits) is found to be very sensitive to measured sorption values immediately after gas exposure. This affects the magnitude of calculated diffusion coefficients.

[1]  A. Newns The sorption and desorption kinetics of water in a regenerated cellulose , 1959 .

[2]  Saikat Mazumder,et al.  Swelling of Coal in Response to CO2 Sequestration for ECBM and Its Effect on Fracture Permeability , 2006 .

[3]  T. Blach,et al.  Small angle X-ray scattering mapping and kinetics study of sub-critical CO2 sorption by two Australian coals , 2009 .

[4]  Stuart Day,et al.  Swelling of Coals by Supercritical Gases and Its Relationship to Sorption , 2010 .

[5]  Martin Böhning,et al.  CO2 Sorption Induced Dilation in Polysulfone: Comparative Analysis of Experimental and Molecular Modeling Results , 2006 .

[6]  Basil Beamish,et al.  Coalbed methane sorption related to coal composition , 1998 .

[7]  M. McLinden,et al.  NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 8.0 , 2007 .

[8]  Noreen L. Thomas,et al.  A theory of case II diffusion , 1982 .

[9]  J. Mathews,et al.  Sorption Capacity and Sorption Kinetic Measurements of CO2 and CH4 in Confined and Unconfined Bituminous Coal , 2009 .

[10]  J. Crank,et al.  A theoretical investigation of the influence of molecular relaxation and internal stress on diffusion in polymers , 1953 .

[11]  D. Charrière,et al.  Effect of pressure and temperature on diffusion of CO2 and CH4 into coal from the Lorraine basin (France) , 2010 .

[12]  Eli Ruckenstein,et al.  Sorption by solids with bidisperse pore structures , 1971 .

[13]  Hong Gao,et al.  Kinetic study on solvent swelling of coal particles , 2008 .

[14]  Kinetics of CO2 sorption for two Polish hard coals , 1993 .

[15]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Heterogeneous Sorption and Swelling in a Confined and Stressed Coal during CO2 Injection , 2003 .

[16]  A. R. Berens,et al.  Diffusion and relaxation in glassy polymer powders: 2. Separation of diffusion and relaxation parameters , 1978 .

[17]  R. Palmer,et al.  Models of hierarchically constrained dynamics for glassy relaxation , 1984 .

[18]  D. Do,et al.  Dynamics of carbon dioxide sorption on activated‐carbon particles , 1991 .

[19]  V. T. Stannett,et al.  Effect of particle size on the mechanism controlling n-hexane sorption in glassy polystyrene microspheres , 1977 .

[20]  G. Reichenauer Micropore Adsorption Dynamics in Synthetic Hard Carbons , 2005 .

[21]  Van Krevelen,et al.  Coal: Typology - Physics - Chemistry - Constitution , 1993 .

[22]  Douglas M. Ruthven,et al.  Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes , 1984 .

[23]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Carbon dioxide sorption and diffusion in coals: Experimental investigation and modeling , 2012, Science China Earth Sciences.

[24]  E. Suuberg,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Solvent Swelling and Diffusion Processes in Coals , 1997 .

[25]  Peter J. Crosdale,et al.  Role of coal type and rank on methane sorption characteristics of Bowen Basin, Australia coals , 1999 .

[26]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data , 2004 .

[27]  D. Ruthven,et al.  The effect of the concentration dependence of diffusivity on zeolitic sorption curves , 1972 .

[28]  David R. Cole,et al.  Adsorption Kinetics of CO2, CH4, and their Equimolar Mixture on Coal from the Black Warrior Basin, West-Central Alabama , 2009 .

[29]  P. Budd,et al.  Adsorption studies of a microporous phthalocyanine network polymer. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 2. Adsorption rate modeling , 1999 .

[31]  V. Stannett,et al.  Diffusion, swelling, and consolidation in glassy polystyrene microspheres , 1980 .

[32]  N. Peppas,et al.  TRANSPORT OF PENETRANTS IN THE MACROMOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF COALS. I. ANOMALOUS TRANSPORT IN UNTREATED AND PYRIDINE-EXTRACTED COALS , 1985 .

[33]  S. Kelemen,et al.  Physical properties of selected block Argonne Premium bituminous coal related to CO2, CH4, and N2 adsorption , 2009 .

[34]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A bidisperse pore diffusion model for methane displacement desorption in coal by CO2 injection , 2003 .

[35]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[36]  J. Bruining,et al.  Interpretation of carbon dioxide diffusion behavior in coals , 2007 .

[37]  A. Busch,et al.  CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: A review , 2011 .

[38]  A. Busch,et al.  Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption–diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling , 2004 .

[39]  D. Ruthven Sorption kinetics for diffusion-controlled systems with a strongly concentration-dependent diffusivity , 2004 .

[40]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Effects of matrix moisture on gas diffusion and flow in coal , 2010 .

[41]  K. Thomas,et al.  The kinetics of coal solvent swelling using pyridine as solvent , 1993 .

[42]  Andreas Busch,et al.  High-pressure sorption isotherms and sorption kinetics of CH4 and CO2 on coals , 2010 .

[43]  Z. Weishauptová,et al.  The effect of moisture on the sorption process of CO2 on coal , 2012 .