Tech-Art-Theory

This paper explores the nature and potential of improvisation as a method for learning and teaching in CSCW and HCI. It starts by reviewing concepts of improvisational learning in classic and more recent work in educational theory, art and music, and HCI that emphasize the reconstructive, materially-driven, error-engaged, transgressive, and collaborative nature of human learning processes. It then describes three pedagogical interventions of our own in which improvisational techniques were deployed as methods of teaching and learning. From this integrated study, we report specific pedagogical conditions (socio-material evaluations, multi-sensory practices, and making safe spaces for error) that can support improvisational learning, and three common challenges of HCI pedagogy relevance, assessment, and inclusion that improvisational methods can help to address.

[1]  Colin M. Gray,et al.  Conceptions of design by transdisciplinary educators: disciplinary background and pedagogical engagement , 2019, International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

[2]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[3]  Saul Greenberg.  Embedding a Design Studio Course in a Conventional Computer Science Program , 2007, HCIEd.

[4]  Betsy DiSalvo,et al.  Design in the HCI Classroom: Setting a Research Agenda , 2019, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[5]  Lynn Butler-Kisber,et al.  Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts-Informed Perspectives , 2010 .

[6]  Deirdre V. Lovecky,et al.  Different Minds: Gifted Children with AD/HD, Asperger Syndrome, and Other Learning Deficits , 2003 .

[7]  T. Ingold.  Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture , 2013 .

[8]  Kiran Trehan,et al.  Reflections on working with critical action learning , 2004 .

[9]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[10]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Intermodulation: Improvisation and Collaborative Art Practice for HCI , 2018, CHI.

[11]  David F. Evans.  Big Road Blues: Tradition And Creativity In The Folk Blues , 1982 .

[12]  R. Weiss.  Learning from strangers : the art and method of qualitative interview studies , 1995 .

[13]  Diana Bohm,et al.  Doing Visual Ethnography , 2016 .

[14]  Matthew D. Thibeault,et al.  Plans, Takes, and Mis-takes , 2008, Outlines. Critical Practice Studies.

[15]  J. Dewey,et al.  Knowing and the Known , 1949 .

[16]  E. Ulman,et al.  Art Therapy in Theory & Practice. , 1996 .

[17]  L. Connelly.  Grounded theory. , 2013, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[18]  Maxine C. Hairston.  Diversity, Ideology, and Teaching Writing. , 1992 .

[19]  T. Grandin.  How does visual thinking work in the mind of a person with autism? A personal account , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Roger Hadgraft,et al.  Assessment Design for Studio-Based Learning , 2019, ACE '19.

[21]  R. C. Reilly,et al.  Learning in Third Spaces: Community Art Studio as Storefront University Classroom , 2015, American journal of community psychology.

[22]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Promoting creativity in the computer science design studio , 2011, SIGCSE '11.

[23]  Trevor Pinch.  “Bring on Sector Two!” The sounds of bent and broken circuits , 2016 .

[24]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Designing for repair?: infrastructures and materialities of breakdown , 2014, CSCW.

[25]  M. Katritzky.  Improvisation in the Arts of the Middle Ages and Renaissance , 2003 .

[26]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  ConstructionismD . Raskin.  Constructivism in Psychology: Personal Construct Psychology, Radical Constructivism, and Social , 2002 .

[28]  M. Schoen.  The Moral Judgment of the Child. , 1933 .

[29]  Christopher D. Hundhausen,et al.  An Empirical Study of the “Prototype Walkthrough”: A Studio-Based Activity for HCI Education , 2012, TCHI.

[30]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Constructing and constraining participation in participatory arts and HCI , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  J. C. Flanagan.  Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[32]  Daniela K. Rosner,et al.  Special issue on hybrid pedagogies editorial , 2019, Digit. Creativity.

[33]  Tara McNealy,et al.  The Learning Portfolio: Reflective Practice for Improving Student Learning, and: Portfolio Development and the Assessment of Prior Learning: Perspectives, Models, and Practices (review) , 2006 .

[34]  Kim Halskov,et al.  Documenting the Research Through Design Process , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[35]  Kerry Gordon,et al.  A game of snakes and ladders , 2008 .

[36]  R. Adams,et al.  Teaching Without a Net: Mindful Design Education , 2019, Design Education Today.

[37]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Improvisation and the creative process : Dewey, collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity , 2000 .

[38]  W. Mackay,et al.  Deconstructing Creativity: Non-Linear Processes and Fluid Roles in Contemporary Music and Dance , 2021 .

[39]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[40]  Ernest A. Edmonds,et al.  The studio as laboratory: Combining creative practice and digital technology research , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  Tim Ingold,et al.  The textility of making , 2010 .

[42]  Dialogic Reflection and Journaling , 1997 .

[43]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Benefits of multisensory learning , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  B. C. Smith,et al.  Organising User Interfaces Around Reflective Accounts , 1998 .

[45]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[46]  V. Kaptelinin.  Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[47]  Anna Vallgårda,et al.  Interaction Design as a Bricolage Practice , 2015, TEI.

[48]  Matt Ratto,et al.  Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life , 2011, Inf. Soc..

[49]  Louisa Penfold.  Art as experience , 2017 .

[50]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[51]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[52]  I. Bogost.  Alien Phenomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing , 2012 .

[53]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[54]  Colin M. Gray,et al.  Advancing UX Education: A Model for Integrated Studio Pedagogy , 2017, CHI.

[55]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Reimagining Digital Fabrication as Performance Art , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[56]  Tracee Vetting Wolf,et al.  Supporting design studio culture in HCI , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[57]  Brian Magerko,et al.  Learning Movement through Human-Computer Co-Creative Improvisation , 2019, MOCO.

[58]  Barbara Herman.  The Moral Judgment Of The Child , 2021 .

[59]  Melanie Feinberg,et al.  Material Vision , 2017, CSCW.

[60]  W. Kentridge.  Six Drawing Lessons , 2014 .

[61]  Elizabeth Gerber,et al.  Improvisation principles and techniques for design , 2007, CHI.

[62]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[63]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Values in Repair , 2016, CHI.

[64]  John Zimmerman,et al.  Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI , 2007, CHI.

[65]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters , 2009, C&C '09.

[66]  Garnet Hertz,et al.  Zombie Media: Circuit Bending Media Archaeology into an Art Method , 2012, Leonardo.

[67]  P. Berliner.  Thinking in Jazz: The Infinite Art of Improvisation , 1995 .

[68]  L. Rosenberg.  The effects of multisensory, explicit, and systematic instructional practices on elementary school students with learning impairments in encoding and oral reading , 2015 .

[69]  George E. Lewis,et al.  The Oxford handbook of critical improvisation studies , 2016 .

[70]  S. McAndrew.  Method meets art: Arts‐based research practice , 2010 .

[71]  Gabrielle Durepos.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[72]  Paula Alexandra Silva,et al.  Applying Studio-Based Learning Methodology in Computer Science Education to Improve 21st Century Skills , 2018, HCI.

[73]  John Leaney,et al.  Things coming together: learning experiences in a software studio , 2014, ITiCSE '14.

[74]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Emergent themes in a UI design hybrid-studio course , 2012, SIGCSE '12.

[75]  Kevin K. Kumashiro.  Against Repetition: Addressing Resistance to Anti-Oppressive Change in the Practices of Learning, Teaching, Supervising, and Researching , 2002 .

[76]  C. Lobman,et al.  Unscripted Learning: Using Improv Activities Across the K-8 Curriculum , 2007 .

[77]  Sophia Kluge,et al.  Computation And Human Experience , 2016 .

[78]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Knowledge Production in Interaction Design , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[79]  R. W. Revans.  Action Learning: Its Origins and Nature , 2016 .

[80]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Performance-Led Research in the Wild , 2013, TCHI.

[81]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[82]  Donald A. Schön.  Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[83]  Steven Dow,et al.  Designing Interactive Scaffolds to Encourage Reflection on Peer Feedback , 2020, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[84]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind, culture, and activity : seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition , 1997 .

[85]  E. Ackermann.  Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .

[86]  Amanda Yeşilbursa.  DESCRIPTIVE VERSUS DIALOGIC REFLECTION AND POSITIVE VERSUS NEGATIVE STANCE IN THE REFLECTIVE WRITING OF TURKISH PROSPECTIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS , 2011 .

[87]  Chandramouli Chandrasekaran,et al.  Computational principles and models of multisensory integration , 2017, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[88]  S. Collier,et al.  Characteristics of Reflective Thought During the Student Teaching Experience , 1999 .

[89]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[90]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[91]  Laura Devendorf,et al.  Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships , 2018, CHI.

[92]  J. Kaufman,et al.  Structure and Improvisation in Creative Teaching: Teaching for Creativity with Disciplined Improvisation , 2011 .

[93]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Gesture-based human-robot Jazz improvisation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[94]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Legitimate Peripheral Participation in Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[95]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective , 2008, Digit. Creativity.

[96]  Estelle Barrett,et al.  Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry , 2014 .

[97]  D. Laplane.  Thought and language. , 1992, Behavioural neurology.

[98]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[99]  Tom McKlin,et al.  Cultural Clash: Exploring How Studio-Based Pedagogy Impacts Learning for Students in HCI Classrooms , 2020, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[100]  Deborah A. Fields,et al.  A Crafts-Oriented Approach to Computing in High School , 2014, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[101]  William W. Gaver.  What should we expect from research through design? , 2012, CHI.

[102]  R. Sawyer,et al.  Group creativity: musical performance and collaboration , 2006 .

[103]  Laewoo Kang.  Echo(): Listening to the Reflection of Obsolete Technology , 2017, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[104]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Designing for Productive Failure , 2012 .