Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach.
暂无分享,去创建一个
C J Slager | D Keane | K G Lehmann | P. Serruys | C. Slager | C. Di Mario | Y. Ozaki | K. Lehmann | C. Mario | R. Kirkeeide | J. Haase | P W Serruys | C di Mario | J Haase | D. Keane | Y Ozaki | R Kirkeeide | E Montauban van Swijndregt | E. V. Swijndregt | E. Montauban van Swijndregt | P. Serruys
[1] E. Topol,et al. Current Review of Interventional Cardiology , 1997 .
[2] P. Close,et al. Evaluation of recombinant hirudin (CGP 39,393/TMREVASC) in the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Rationale and design of the HELVETICA trial, a multicentre randomized double blind heparin controlled study. , 1995, European heart journal.
[3] P. Serruys,et al. In vivo validation of an experimental adaptive quantitative coronary angiography algorithm to circumvent overestimation of small luminal diameters. , 1995, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[4] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. Progress in quantitative coronary arteriography , 2012, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[5] P. Serruys,et al. Radiological quality of coronary guiding catheters: a quantitative analysis. , 1994, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[6] W Rutsch,et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] P. Teirstein,et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.
[8] J. Reiber,et al. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[9] P. Serruys,et al. Prevention of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: rationale and design of the Fluvastatin Angioplasty Restenosis (FLARE) Trial. The FLARE Study Group. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.
[10] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. Why and how should QCA systems be validated , 1994 .
[11] David Keane,et al. How reliable are geometric coronary measurements? In vitro and in vivo validation of digital and cinefilm-based quantitative coronary analysis systems , 1994 .
[12] P. Serruys,et al. Percutaneous implantation of coronary stenosis phantoms in an anesthetized swine model to validate current quantitative angiography analysis systems , 1994 .
[13] S. Yeh,et al. Characteristics and radiofrequency ablation therapy of intermediate septal accessory pathway. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.
[14] P. Serruys,et al. Quantitative Coronary Angiography in Clinical Practice , 1994, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[15] P. Serruys,et al. Usefulness of repeat coronary angiography 24 hours after successful balloon angioplasty to evaluate early luminal deterioration and facilitate quantitative analysis. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.
[16] P. Serruys,et al. Restenosis revisited: insights provided by quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, American heart journal.
[17] M Siebes,et al. Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[18] C J Slager,et al. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[19] P. Serruys,et al. Evaluation of Ketanserin in the Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty A Multicenter Randomized Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1993, Circulation.
[20] D. Baim,et al. Defining coronary restenosis. Newer clinical and angiographic paradigms. , 1993, Circulation.
[21] P. Serruys,et al. Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm-based geometric coronary measurement software. , 1993, American heart journal.
[22] D. Ricci,et al. A comparison of directional atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] R. Califf,et al. A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .
[24] T. Craven,et al. Prognostic Significance of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis , 1993, Circulation.
[25] E. Topol,et al. Quantitative analysis of factors influencing late lumen loss and restenosis after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.
[26] P. Serruys,et al. Matching based on quantitative coronary angiography as a surrogate for randomized studies: comparison between stent implantation and balloon angioplasty of native coronary artery lesions. , 1993, American heart journal.
[27] A. Gershlick,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a proposal of new comparative approaches based on quantitative angiography. , 1992, British heart journal.
[28] P. Serruys,et al. Experiences of a quantitative coronary angiographic core laboratory in restenosis prevention trials , 1993 .
[29] D. Waters,et al. Advantages and limitations of serial coronary arteriography for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Implications for clinical trials. , 1993, Circulation.
[30] C M Gibson,et al. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[31] J. Reiber,et al. Edge detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: an in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, American heart journal.
[32] P D Verdouw,et al. In-vivo validation of on-line and off-line geometric coronary measurements using insertion of stenosis phantoms in porcine coronary arteries. , 1992, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.
[33] P. Serruys,et al. Does the New Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Cilazapril Prevent Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplast?: Results of the MERCATOR Study A Multicenter, Randomized, Double‐Blind Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1992 .
[34] Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al. Does the new angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril prevent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty? Results of the MERCATOR study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Multicenter European Research Trial with Cilazapril after Angiopla , 1992, Circulation.
[35] D. Baim,et al. Novel approach to the analysis of restenosis after the use of three new coronary devices. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[36] P. Serruys,et al. Calibration using angiographic catheters as scaling devices--importance of filming the catheters not filled with contrast medium. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.
[37] P. Serruys,et al. Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near gaussian distribution: a quantitative angiographic study in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[38] P. Serruys,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: the paradox of increased lumen diameter and restenosis. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[39] K. Gould,et al. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[40] P. Serruys,et al. Prevention of Restenosis After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty With Thromboxane A2‐Receptor Blockade: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial , 1991, Circulation.
[41] J. Beier,et al. Edge detection for coronary angiograms: error correction and impact of derivatives , 1991, [1991] Proceedings Computers in Cardiology.
[42] P J de Feyter,et al. Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. , 1991, Circulation.
[43] P. Serruys,et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: new standards for clinical studies. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[44] N. Kleiman,et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography to visual estimates of lesion severity pre and post PTCA. , 1990, American heart journal.
[45] C. J. Kooijman,et al. How critical is frame selection in quantitative coronary angiographic studies? , 1989, European heart journal.
[46] G H Reil,et al. Influence of ionic and non-ionic radiographic contrast media on the vasomotor tone of epicardial coronary arteries. , 1989, European heart journal.
[47] S M Collins,et al. Videodensitometric analysis of coronary stenoses. In vivo geometric and physiologic validation in humans. , 1988, Investigative radiology.
[48] T. Bashore,et al. Comparison of coronary stenosis quantitation results from on-line digital and digitized cine film images. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.
[49] P J de Feyter,et al. Change in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[50] E R Bates,et al. A comparison of 35 mm cine film and digital radiographic image recording: implications for quantitative coronary arteriography. Film vs. digital coronary quantification. , 1988, Investigative radiology.
[51] P W Serruys,et al. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. , 1988, Circulation.
[52] David M. Herrington,et al. Issues of validation in quantitative coronary angiography , 1988 .
[53] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. New Developments in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1988, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.
[54] M. LeFree,et al. Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of a rapid digital angiographic method. , 1987, Circulation.
[55] Johan H. C. Reiber,et al. Approaches towards standardization in acquisition and quantitation of arterial dimensions from cineangiograms , 1986 .
[56] M L Giger,et al. Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 5. Characteristic curves of II-TV digital systems. , 1986, Medical physics.
[57] J. J. Gerbrands,et al. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. , 1985, Circulation.
[58] C A Mistretta,et al. A technique of scatter and glare correction for videodensitometric studies in digital subtraction videoangiography. , 1982, Radiology.
[59] J. Murray,et al. Variability in the Analysis of Coronary Arteriograms , 1977, Circulation.
[60] R. Dinsmore,et al. Interobserver Variability in Coronary Angiography , 1976, Circulation.
[61] T. Takaro,et al. Observer Agreement in Evaluating Coronary Angiograms , 1975, Circulation.