The user – the great unknown of systems development: reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement

We are witnessing an interesting era in the history of computing and information technology (IT). Computing, telephone and television on the one hand and data, voice and video on the other hand are converging. Internet, the World Wide Web and mobile computing have made IT truly global. IT has become pervasive – it is increasingly difficult for human beings to live their lives without encountering IT. The applications of IT have expanded from traditional automating (e.g. process control and embedded applications), augmenting (e.g. word processing), informating (information systems proper) and communicating (e.g. email) applications to various accompanying (e.g. computer pets), entertaining (e.g. computer games) and fantasizing applications (e.g. virtual world applications such as Second Life) (Iivari, 2007). Modern IT has enabled us to organize our society, business, and lives in new ways. Both in the private and public sector, services or ‘meta-services’, i.e. services required for or supporting the acquisition of the primary service, are increasingly transferred to the internet, and people are being coerced more or less gently into using these electronic services (e.g. Internet banking). These electronic services frequently change the division of labour between people, e.g. between the customers and employees of the service providers. For instance, in internet banking, customers perform many operations previously performed by the bank clerks. Customers have become users of banking applications. IT has enabled organizations and individuals to become globally networked, as evidenced by network organizations and virtual communities. The IT field has not only been the supplier of the technology, but has also been profoundly influenced by these new ways of organizing. The digital nature of software has made it a natural application area for global e-commerce, outsourcing, offshoring, geographically distributed development and also virtual communitybased open-source development. The world of digital convergence and the new IT applications challenge many traditional boundaries. The border between IT and non-IT has become blurred, and as a consequence IT use may be implicit in the sense that people may not necessarily perceive themselves as IT users. For example, are people watching TV and interacting with the program using short doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00336.x

[1]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Morten Kyng Scandanavian design: users in product development , 1994, CHI Conference Companion.

[3]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development , 1991 .

[4]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems , 2006 .

[5]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users , 1991, Computer.

[6]  Denise Silver,et al.  Joint Application Development , 1995 .

[7]  Alain Abran,et al.  The Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[9]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[10]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[11]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  A three-faceted view of information systems , 1998, CACM.

[12]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems , 2004, PDC 04.

[13]  Hannakaisa Isomäki,et al.  The Prevailing Conceptions of the Human Being in Information Systems Development: Systems Designers' Reflections , 2002 .

[14]  Franz Lehner,et al.  Requirements Engineering as a Success Factor in Software Projects , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[15]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  User interface design , 1990, ACM Press Frontier Series.

[16]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[18]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Where now for development methodologies? , 2003, CACM.

[20]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Integrating Human-Computer Interaction Development into the Systems Development Life Cycle: A Methodology , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Key principles for user-centred systems design , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[22]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[23]  Ahmed Seffah,et al.  The obstacles and myths of usability and software engineering , 2004, CACM.

[24]  Inger Boivie,et al.  Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[28]  Hannakaisa Isomäki,et al.  Different Levels of Information Systems Designers' Forms of Thought and Potential for Human-Centered Design , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[29]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[30]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[31]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Interaction, transformation and information systems development - an extended application of Soft Systems Methodology , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[33]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[34]  Samuli Pekkola,et al.  Towards formalised end-user participation in information systems development process: bridging the gap between participatory design and ISD methodologies , 2006, PDC '06.

[35]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[36]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Assessing participative systems design: Some conclusions from an exploratory study , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[37]  William T F Goossen Human interaction. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[38]  Ilpo Koskinen,et al.  User-generated content in mobile multimedia: empirical evidence from user studies , 2003, 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME '03. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8698).

[39]  I. Alam An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development , 2002 .

[40]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Emerging principles for requirements processes in organizational contexts , 2008, Ingénierie des Systèmes d Inf..

[41]  Henri Barki,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement , 1989, MIS Q..

[42]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Thierry Bardini,et al.  The Social Construction of the Personal Computer User , 1995 .

[44]  J. Krige How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[45]  Luciana C. Ballejos,et al.  Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments , 2008, Requirements Engineering.

[46]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for Information Systems experts: coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  G. Towl Editorial , 2012, Evidence Based Mental Health.

[48]  Netta Iivari,et al.  'Representing the User' in software development - a cultural analysis of usability work in the product development context , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[49]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  User interface design in large corporations: coordination and communication across disciplines , 1989, CHI '89.

[50]  Julie Fisher,et al.  E-Commerce Research in Australia: Inviting a Comparative Analysis , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[52]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  User participation in decision support systems development: Influencing system outcomes , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[53]  George Ghinea,et al.  Software development methods and usability: Perspectives from a survey in the software industry in Norway , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[54]  J. Iivari,et al.  Varieties of User-Centeredness , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[55]  Peter Meso,et al.  Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .