Ideal and nonideal moral theory for disaster bioethics

Abstract Moral theory has generally focused on resolving ethical dilemmas by identifying ethically sound options. Whether the focus is on consequences, duties, principles or virtues, ethical cases are often approached in ways that assume morally sound solutions can be found and followed. Such ‘ideal morality’ assumes that moral goodness is always possible, leaving people confident they have done the right thing. Such an approach becomes inadequate in disaster settings where any good solution is often difficult to see. This paper examines recent work on nonideal moral theory as a useful model for disaster bioethics. This approach views moral dilemmas as situations where no choice is ideal and every option involves some element of unavoidable wrongdoing. Rather than straining for ideal answers, this approach acknowledges that sometimes the lesser of two evils is the best that can be done. Such situations inevitably lead to feelings of regret or guilt, commonly encountered in discussions of disaster bioethics. This paper explores the practical implications of nonideal approaches for disaster responders working in tragic situations.

[1]  Lisa Tessman Idealizing Morality , 2010, Hypatia.

[2]  D. V. van Hoving,et al.  Haiti Disaster Tourism—A Medical Shame , 2010, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[3]  R. Goodin,et al.  On Complicity and Compromise , 2013 .

[4]  C. Petrini,et al.  A personalist approach to public-health ethics. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[5]  C. Petrini Triage in public health emergencies: ethical issues , 2010, Internal and emergency medicine.

[6]  S. Turale,et al.  Nurses' experiences of ethical preparedness for public health emergencies and healthcare disasters: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. , 2014, Nursing & health sciences.

[7]  Nachman Ash,et al.  The Israeli field hospital in Haiti--ethical dilemmas in early disaster response. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. Rawbone,et al.  Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th Edition , 2015 .

[9]  Sheri Fink,et al.  Five Days at Memorial: Life and Death in a Storm-Ravaged Hospital , 2013 .

[10]  Lisa Tessman Feminist Eudaimonism: Eudaimonism as Non-Ideal Theory , 2009 .

[11]  D. O’Mathúna Research ethics in the context of humanitarian emergencies , 2015, Journal of evidence-based medicine.

[12]  Julian Sheather,et al.  Ethical dilemmas in medical humanitarian practice: cases for reflection from Médecins Sans Frontières , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[13]  H. Slim Humanitarian Ethics: A Guide to the Morality of Aid in War and Disaster , 2015 .

[14]  J. W. DeCew Moral Conflicts and Ethical Relativism , 1990, Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy.

[15]  T. Beauchamp,et al.  Principles of biomedical ethics , 1991 .

[16]  P. A. Scott,et al.  Patient autonomy and choice in healthcare: self-testing devices as a case in point , 2011, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.

[17]  E. Kalokairinou Why helping the victims of disasters makes me a better person: Towards an anthropological theory of humanitarian action , 2016 .

[18]  D. Alexander,et al.  First Responders after Disasters: A Review of Stress Reactions, At-Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience Factors , 2009, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[19]  Michael D. Dahnke,et al.  Nursing Ethics and Disaster Triage: Applying Utilitarian Ethical Theory. , 2015, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[20]  Carmen Tanner,et al.  How “moral” are the principles of biomedical ethics? – a cross-domain evaluation of the common morality hypothesis , 2014, BMC medical ethics.

[21]  Matthew Hunt,et al.  Ethics and Emergency Disaster Response. Normative Approaches and Training Needs for Humanitarian Health Care Providers , 2014 .