The value of LibraryThing tags for academic libraries

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the percentage of recently published books provided with tags drawn from LibraryThing for Libraries, the nature of these tags, the relation of the tags with keywords in the record and the percentage of records actually enhanced by tags.Design/methodology/approach – A random sample of 600 records from a catalog of a large academic library was examined to determine whether or not they carry tags. A random sample of 160 records was taken to assess their nature and added value for retrieval purposes.Findings – It was found that: about one third of the records are provided with tags; 80 percent of the tags are subject terms; 50 percent of the subject tags are covered by a keyword in the record; 25 percent are broader than a keyword and another 25 percent are related, narrower or new. Almost 40 percent of the records with tags can be considered as enriched.Research limitations/implications – In some cases the determination of the added value required a subject...

[1]  Henk J. Voorbij.  Title keywords and subject descriptors: a comparison of subject search entries of books in the humanities and social sciences , 1998, J. Documentation.

[2]  Schubert Foo,et al.  Perspectives on social tagging , 2009 .

[3]  Dana M. Caudle,et al.  To tag or not to tag? , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[4]  Bernardo A. Huberman,et al.  Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Tom Steele.  The new cooperative cataloging , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[6]  Alexandra Chappell,et al.  LibraryThing for libraries at Claremont , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[7]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Resource discovery through social tagging: a classification and content analytic approach , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  L. H. Mendes,et al.  Subjecting the catalog to tagging , 2009, Libr. Hi Tech.

[9]  Margaret E. I. Kipp,et al.  Complementary or Discrete Contexts in Online Indexing : A Comparison of User, Creator, and Intermediary Keywords , 2013 .

[10]  Judith Gelernter,et al.  A quantitative analysis of collaborative tags: Evaluation for information retrieval—a preliminary study , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007).

[11]  Karen G. Lawson.  Mining Social Tagging Data for Enhanced Subject Access for Readers and Researchers. , 2009 .

[12]  Ali Shiri.  An examination of social tagging interface features and functionalities: An analytical comparison , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  Peter J. Rolla.  User Tags versus Subject Headings: Can User-Supplied Data Improve Subject Access to Library Collections? , 2009 .