LCA and Multi-Criteria Analysis of Fly Ash Concrete Pavements

Rapid industrialization results in increased use of natural resources bring along serious ecological and environmental imbalance due to the dumping of industrial wastes. Principles of sustainable construction have to be accepted with regard to the consumption of natural resources and the production of harmful emissions. Cement is a great importance raw material in the building industry and today is its large amount used in the construction of concrete pavements. Concerning raw materials cost and producing CO2 emission the replacing of cement in concrete mixtures with more sustainable materials is necessary. To reduce this environmental impact people all over the world are looking for a solution. Over a period of last ten years, the image of fly ash has completely been changed from a polluting waste to resource material and it can solve the major problems of cement use. Fly ash concretes are proposed as a potential approach for achieving substantial reductions in cement. It is known that it improves the workability of concrete, extends the life cycle of concrete roads, and reduces energy use and greenhouse gas as well as amount of coal combustion products that must be disposed in landfills. Life cycle assessment also proved that a concrete pavement with fly ash cement replacement is considerably more environmentally friendly compared to standard concrete roads. In addition, fly ash is cheap raw material, and the costs saving are guaranteed. The strength properties, resistance to a frost or de-icing salts, which are important characteristics in the construction of concrete pavements, have reached the required standards as well. In terms of human health it can ́t be stated that a concrete cover with fly ash could be dangerous compared with a cover without fly ash. Final Multi-criteria analysis also pointed that a concrete with fly ash is a clearly proper solution. Keywords—Life cycle assessment, fly ash, waste, concrete

[1]  Jeannette Sjunnesson Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete , 2005 .

[2]  Manfredi Simone,et al.  Supporting Environmentally Sound Decisions for Waste Management - A technical guide to Life Cycle Thinking (LCT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for waste experts and LCA practitioners , 2011 .

[3]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. : Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. , 2009 .

[4]  S. Vilčeková,et al.  Reduction of Carbon Footprint of Building Structures , 2012 .

[5]  Bashar Taha,et al.  Properties of concrete contains mixed colour waste recycled glass as sand and cement replacement , 2008 .

[6]  A. Eštoková,et al.  Reduction of primary energy and CO2 emissions through selection and environmental evaluation of building materials , 2012, Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering.

[7]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Products: Volume 2: Scientific Background , 1997 .

[8]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[9]  Antonio Aguado,et al.  Comparative analysis of the life cycle impact assessment of available cement inventories in the EU , 2007 .

[10]  J. I. Brauman Polymers , 1991, Science.

[11]  Bjørn Berge,et al.  The Ecology of Building Materials , 2000 .

[12]  A Polettini,et al.  Chemical activation in view of MSWI bottom ash recycling in cement-based systems. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  Claus Pade,et al.  The CO2 Uptake of Concrete in a 100 Year Perspective , 2007 .

[14]  James A. Fava,et al.  Will the Next 10 Years be as Productive in Advancing Life Cycle Approaches as the Last 15 Years? , 2006 .

[15]  Tiwari Jeetendra Kumar,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS : A CASE STUDY OF ACC CEMENT PLANT , 2012 .

[16]  D. Huntzinger,et al.  A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies , 2009 .

[17]  Anne Ventura,et al.  Technical and environmental effects of concrete production: dry batch versus central mixed plant , 2010 .