Intransitive competition is widespread in plant communities and maintains their species richness.

Intransitive competition networks, those in which there is no single best competitor, may ensure species coexistence. However, their frequency and importance in maintaining diversity in real-world ecosystems remain unclear. We used two large data sets from drylands and agricultural grasslands to assess: (1) the generality of intransitive competition, (2) intransitivity-richness relationships and (3) effects of two major drivers of biodiversity loss (aridity and land-use intensification) on intransitivity and species richness. Intransitive competition occurred in > 65% of sites and was associated with higher species richness. Intransitivity increased with aridity, partly buffering its negative effects on diversity, but was decreased by intensive land use, enhancing its negative effects on diversity. These contrasting responses likely arise because intransitivity is promoted by temporal heterogeneity, which is enhanced by aridity but may decline with land-use intensity. We show that intransitivity is widespread in nature and increases diversity, but it can be lost with environmental homogenisation.

[1]  L. Aarssen Pecking order of four plant species from pastures of different ages , 1988 .

[2]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[3]  Robert A. Laird,et al.  Competitive Intransitivity Promotes Species Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[4]  James B. Grace,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Natural Systems , 2006 .

[5]  Lewi Stone,et al.  Competitive exclusion, or species aggregation? , 1992, Oecologia.

[6]  F. Maestre,et al.  Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands , 2013, Nature.

[7]  David Tilman,et al.  Human-caused environmental change: Impacts on plant diversity and evolution , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Competitive hierarchies and the structure of herbaceous plant communities , 1991 .

[9]  P. Manning The impact of nitrogen enrichment on ecosystems and their services , 2012 .

[10]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[11]  E. Borer,et al.  Pathogen-induced reversal of native dominance in a grassland community , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Paul E. Gessler,et al.  Soil-Landscape Modelling and Spatial Prediction of Soil Attributes , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  B. McCune,et al.  Analysis of Ecological Communities , 2002 .

[14]  K. Gross,et al.  Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Null model analysis of species associations using abundance data. , 2010, Ecology.

[16]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  A competitive network theory of species diversity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  Null model analysis of species nestedness patterns. , 2007, Ecology.

[18]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: Integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization , 2012 .

[19]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Coexistence of Competitors in a Stochastic Environment: The Storage Effect , 1983 .

[20]  W. Stanley Harpole,et al.  Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension , 2007, Nature.

[21]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[22]  T. Herben,et al.  Competitive hierarchies, reversals of rank order and the de Wit approach : are they compatible? , 1990 .

[23]  F. Maestre,et al.  Microhabitat amelioration and reduced competition among understorey plants as drivers of facilitation across environmental gradients: towards a unifying framework. , 2011, Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics.

[24]  D. Coleman Ecology of Desert Systems , 2003 .

[25]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks. , 2011, Ecology.

[26]  J. Wootton,et al.  Causes of species diversity differences: a comparative analysis of Markov models , 2001 .

[27]  W. Ulrich CoOccurrence - a FORTRAN program for species co-occurrence analysis , 2008 .

[28]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[29]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Matrix models for quantifying competitive intransitivity. , 2014, Oikos.

[30]  N. Epstein,et al.  Examination , 1947, The Lancet.

[31]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Modeling species co-occurrence by multivariate logistic regression generates new hypotheses on fungal interactions. , 2010, Ecology.

[32]  J. Weltzin,et al.  Can community composition be predicted from pairwise species interactions? , 2008, Plant Ecology.

[33]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The Saguaro: A Population in Relation to Environment. , 1963, Science.

[34]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[35]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Determinants of the abundance of invasive annual weeds: community structure and non–equilibrium dynamics , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Xuewen Huang,et al.  Plant Species Richness and Ecosystem Multifunctionality in Global Drylands , 2012, Science.

[37]  P. Keddy,et al.  Competitive hierarchies in herbaceous plant communities , 1989 .

[38]  I. Schöning,et al.  Interacting effects of fertilization, mowing and grazing on plant species diversity of 1500 grasslands in Germany differ between regions , 2013 .

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  F. Maestre,et al.  Competition increases with abiotic stress and regulates the diversity of biological soil crusts , 2010 .

[41]  N. Gotelli Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[42]  Raymond N. Gorley,et al.  PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER. Guide to software and statistical methods , 2008 .

[43]  L W Buss,et al.  Competitive intransitivity and size-frequency distributions of interacting populations. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Alexandra Weigelt,et al.  Identifying mechanisms of competition in multi‐species communities , 2007 .

[45]  Jens Nieschulze,et al.  Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The Biodiversity Exploratories , 2010 .

[46]  Robert A Laird,et al.  Does local competition increase the coexistence of species in intransitive networks? , 2008, Ecology.

[47]  M. Gilpin Limit Cycles in Competition Communities , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[48]  J. Grace,et al.  The Examination of a Competition Matrix for Transitivity and Intransitive Loops , 1993 .

[49]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  Mechanisms contributing to stability in ecosystem function depend on the environmental context. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[50]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  Nurses experience reciprocal fitness benefits from their distantly related facilitated plants , 2014 .

[51]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Representing general theoretical concepts in structural equation models: the role of composite variables , 2008, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[52]  J. Bronstein,et al.  How context dependent are species interactions? , 2014, Ecology letters.

[53]  M. Feldman,et al.  Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors , 2002, Nature.

[54]  Birgitta König-Ries,et al.  Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The rock–paper–scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies , 1996, Nature.

[56]  N. Gotelli,et al.  Climate and soil attributes determine plant species turnover in global drylands , 2014, Journal of biogeography.

[57]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands , 2014, Nature.

[58]  Yagil Osem,et al.  Grazing effect on diversity of annual plant communities in a semi‐arid rangeland: interactions with small‐scale spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity , 2002 .

[59]  J. Huisman,et al.  Towards a solution of the plankton paradox : the importance of physiology and life history , 2001 .

[60]  Peter Chesson,et al.  New methods for quantifying the spatial storage effect: an illustration with desert annuals. , 2007, Ecology.

[61]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. , 2000, Science.

[62]  J. Seibert,et al.  On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations , 2005 .

[63]  L. Aarssen Causes and consequences of variation in competitive ability in plant communities , 1992 .