MRR-Based Productivity Decisions in Hard Machining

Machining procedures applied in the machining industry have been developing fast due to up-to-date tool materials, new machine-tool structures and automation solutions. This is why today a part’s surface can be machined by more than one procedure having even completely different features. The potential procedures of a certain problem (machining a surface) are those that fulfill the accuracy and surface quality requirements specified in the drawing. The time parameters, the surface rate or the material removal rate can be parameters suitable for comparative analysis and ranking of the selected procedures. In this paper five machining procedures were chosen for machining hardened surfaces. Optimum cutting data, which can be recommended for real plant application as they fulfill the specified roughness and accuracy requirements of the part surfaces, were determined from machining experiments. Considering these data the machining times, operation times and the practical parameter of the material removal rate introduced by us were calculated. This differs from the widely applied theoretical value for material removal rate because it does not reflect just the theoretical time necessary for material removal but takes into account the actual manufacturing/machining times necessary for the machining of the component/surface. The analyzed surfaces are the various diameter and length bore holes of hardened gear wheels produced in large scale. Their efficiency parameters were calculated when the surfaces are machined by traditional bore grinding, hard turning (two procedure versions) and a combined procedure (two procedure versions). On the basis of these data a ranking was determined among the procedures.

[1]  Mahesh D. Pandey,et al.  Stochastic renewal process models for estimation of damage cost over the life-cycle of a structure , 2017 .

[2]  Yuebin Guo,et al.  A comprehensive characterization of 3D surface topography induced by hard turning versus grinding , 2008 .

[3]  B. Vijaya Ramnath,et al.  A grey-fuzzy modeling for evaluating surface roughness and material removal rate of coated end milling insert , 2016 .

[4]  Anders Wretland,et al.  Integrated optimization model for cutting data selection based on maximal MRR and tool utilization in continuous machining operations , 2016 .

[5]  K. Ponappa,et al.  Influence of Coating Material and Cutting Parameters on Surface Roughness and Material Removal Rate in Turning Process Using Taguchi Method , 2018 .

[6]  Christian Ramsauer,et al.  Profit Per Hour as a Target Process Control Parameter for Manufacturing Systems Enabled by Big Data Analytics and Industry 4.0 Infrastructure , 2017 .

[7]  Athanasios G. Mamalis,et al.  Finishing of Hardened Boreholes: Grinding or Hard Cutting? , 2004 .

[8]  Kumar Abhishek,et al.  A simulation approach for estimating flank wear and material removal rate in turning of Inconel 718 , 2015, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[9]  Rabin Kumar Das,et al.  Analysis of MRR and Surface Roughness in Machining Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium Alloy Using EDM Process , 2018 .

[10]  A. Almeida,et al.  The implementation of an Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system in a manufacturing company , 2017 .

[11]  Wilfried Sihn,et al.  Process Oriented Production Evaluation , 2013 .

[12]  János Kundrák,et al.  On the Dry Machining of Steel Surfaces Using Superhard Tools , 2002 .

[13]  Alireza Fadaei Tehrani,et al.  Statistical analysis of wire electrical discharge turning on material removal rate , 2008 .

[15]  Anders Wretland,et al.  Analysis of Tool Utilization from Material Removal Rate Perspective , 2015 .

[16]  Irene Buj-Corral,et al.  Modelling of surface finish and material removal rate in rough honing , 2014 .

[17]  Liam Blunt,et al.  Experimental investigation and analytical modelling of the effects of process parameters on material removal rate for bonnet polishing of cobalt chrome alloy , 2014 .

[18]  Noha Hassan,et al.  Joint decisions of machining process parameters setting and lot-size determination with environmental and quality cost consideration , 2018 .

[19]  Lars Pejryd,et al.  Additive Manufacturing and High Speed Machining -cost Comparison of short Lead Time Manufacturing Methods☆ , 2016 .

[20]  Diptikanta Das,et al.  Experimental investigation on material removal rate and chip forms during turning T6 tempered Al 7075 alloy , 2018 .

[21]  Oscar Martínez Romero,et al.  Combination of simulated annealing and pseudo spectral methods for the optimum removal rate in turning operations of nickel-based alloys , 2018, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[22]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Maximizing Chatter Free Material Removal Rate in Milling through Optimal Selection of Axial and Radial Depth of Cut Pairs , 2005 .

[23]  Raman Kumar,et al.  Multi objective optimization using different methods of assigning weights to energy consumption responses, surface roughness and material removal rate during rough turning operation , 2017 .

[24]  Ekkard Brinksmeier,et al.  Capability Profile of Hard Cutting and Grinding Processes , 2005 .

[25]  Ramón Quiza Sardiñas,et al.  Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning processes , 2006, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[26]  Kaushik Kumar,et al.  Optimization of Material Removal Rate During Turning of SAE 1020 Material in CNC Lathe using Taguchi Technique , 2014 .