Discrimination of Crop and Weeds on Visible and Visible / Near-Infrared Spectrums Using Support Vector Machine , Artificial Neural Network and Decision Tree

Weeds are regarded as farmers' natural enemy. In order to avoid excessive pesticide residues, the destruction of ecological environment, and to guarantee the quality and safety of agricultural products, it is urgent to develop highly-efficient weed management methods. Amongst, weed discrimination is the key part. There have been a lot of researches on weed detection/discrimination using spectral measurement on plant leaf/canopy. However, as reported so far the spectral ranges from the researches were not consistent and no research was reported to determine more efficient wavelength range for weed classification. Some researchers adopted visible spectrum, some adopted near-infrared spectrum, the others adopted both visible and near-infrared spectrum. The purpose of this study was to compare the classifications of the spectral reflectance in range of 350 ~ 760 nm and in 350 ~ 2500 nm for crop/weed discrimination. Through spectral analysis of these data respectively using three kinds of modeling methods of Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Decision Tree (DT), the results showed that the three classifiers could differentiate crop and weeds better in 350 ~ 760 nm wavelength range than in 350 ~ 2500 nm. Therefore, the visible wavelength range could be good enough to meet the requirement for crop/weed spectral discrimination, which might reduce the cost of weed detect sensors. Copyright © 2014 IFSA Publishing, S. L.

[1]  Ning Wang,et al.  Design of an optical weed sensor using plant spectral characteristics , 2000, SPIE Optics East.

[2]  Yong He,et al.  [Identification methods of crop and weeds based on Vis/NIR spectroscopy and RBF-NN model]. , 2008, Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu.

[3]  David W. Franzen,et al.  Neural Network Optimisation of Remotely Sensed Maize Leaf Nitrogen with a Genetic Algorithm and Linear Programming using Five Performance Parameters , 2006 .

[4]  Khan M. Iftekharuddin,et al.  Detection and tracking of targets in infrared images using Bayesian techniques , 2009 .

[5]  R. B. Brown,et al.  Remote Sensing for Identification of Weeds in No-till Corn , 1994 .

[6]  Weilian Wang,et al.  Microwave-based sensor for detection of a shortage in tobacco box , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Information Acquisition.

[7]  Yueting Wang,et al.  [Spectrum analysis of crop and weeds at seedling]. , 2005, Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu.

[8]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques with Java implementations , 2002, SGMD.

[9]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Weed detection using canopy reflectance. , 1999 .

[10]  M. Ashton,et al.  Accuracy assessments of hyperspectral waveband performance for vegetation analysis applications , 2004 .

[11]  J. V. Stafford,et al.  Potential for automatic weed detection and selective herbicide application , 1991 .

[12]  A. Rogalski Infrared detectors: status and trends , 2003 .

[13]  Kyu-Ik Sohng,et al.  Small target detection using cross product based on temporal profile in infrared image sequences , 2010, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[14]  Bo Liu,et al.  [Research on crop-weed discrimination using a field imaging spectrometer]. , 2010, Guang pu xue yu guang pu fen xi = Guang pu.

[15]  Cai Jing-feng Decision Tree Technique and its Current Research , 2005 .

[16]  Francisca López-Granados,et al.  Discrimination of weed seedlings, wheat (Triticum aestivum) stubble and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) , 2003 .

[17]  T. Borregaard,et al.  Crop–weed Discrimination by Line Imaging Spectroscopy , 2000 .

[18]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Prediction of Soybean Growth and Development Stages Using Artificial Neural Network and Statistical Models: Prediction of Soybean Growth and Development Stages Using Artificial Neural Network and Statistical Models , 2009 .