Stuck in the Pipeline: A Critical Review of STEM Workforce Literature

In this critical review of the literature, I interrogate the assumptions underlying STEM workforce studies as it pertains to gender, race, class, and citizenship. First, I provide a brief overview of the pipeline model’s history and critiques. Next, I look at the contemporary use of the model in STEM workforce studies, focusing on the ways in which recruitment and retention, scientific work, and identity are represented, measured, and understood. I argue throughout that the pipeline model has a limited view of retention that is based upon socially constructed ideas about what constitutes “valid” scientific and engineering work and who counts as “real” scientists and engineers.

[1]  Sue A. Maple,et al.  Incompatible Goals: Narratives of Graduate Women in the Mathematics Pipeline , 1996 .

[2]  Carlos Castillo-Chavez,et al.  Increasing Minority Representation in the Mathematical Sciences: Good models but no will to scale up their impact , 2006 .

[3]  Ken Carlson,et al.  How Large Is the Gap in Salaries of Male and Female Engineers? SRS Issue Brief. , 1999 .

[4]  Oili-Helena Ylijoki.  Disciplinary cultures and the moral order of studying – A case-study of four Finnish university departments , 2000 .

[5]  J. Butler.  Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative , 1997 .

[6]  Tracy Camp,et al.  The incredible shrinking pipeline , 2002, SGCS.

[7]  J. Bentley,et al.  Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers: A Literature Review. Special Report. , 2003 .

[8]  Gary Rhoades,et al.  The Emergence of a Competitiveness Research and Development Policy Coalition and the Commercialization of Academic Science and Technology , 1996 .

[9]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Foreign Scholars in U.S. Science: Contributions and Costs , 2003 .

[10]  M. Teitelbaum,et al.  Do We Need More Scientists , 2004 .

[11]  Paula E. Stephan.  Bioinformatics: Recent Trends in Programs, Placements and Job Opportunities , 2004 .

[12]  Lauren Berlant,et al.  Sex in Public , 1998, Critical Inquiry.

[13]  C. Shettle.  Who Is Unemployed? Factors Affecting Unemployment among Individuals with Doctoral Degrees in Science and Engineering. An SRS Special Report. , 1997 .

[14]  Sheila Slaughter,et al.  Academic capitalism and the new economy : markets, state, and higher education , 2009 .

[15]  Patricia S. Mann.  Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity , 1992 .

[16]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[17]  Lenore Blum,et al.  Transforming the Culture of Computing at Carnegie Mellon , 2001 .

[18]  E. Hammonds,et al.  A Conversation on Feminist Science Studies , 2003, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[19]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg,et al.  Doctoral Education and the Faculty of the Future , 2008 .

[20]  Edgar Shaohua Huang,et al.  “Where do you draw the line?”; , 2000 .

[21]  J. Blickenstaff.  Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .

[22]  Janice E. Cuny,et al.  Recruitment and Retention of Women Graduate Students in Computer Science and Engineering: Results of a Workshop Organized by the , 2002 .

[23]  E. Henttonen,et al.  Women in Science. Career processes and Outcomes , 2004 .