Production technology selection: Deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributes

The success and survival of companies are becoming increasingly difficult to ensure in this era of increasing competition and ever-changing environments. Modern technology is playing a key role in the ability of manufacturing companies to compete as world-class enterprises. Therefore, new manufacturing technologies are needed to assist in compressing the production time to move products to the market more quickly and efficiently than competitors. Acquiring and implementing new technologies are perceived as high-risk investments and determinants of competition. To ensure that a selected technology meets these requirements, companies should simultaneously explore and communicate the relationships between evolving and developing markets, as well as competitive and operational strategies over time. However, the published literature on new technology selection hitherto has failed to sufficiently address the relevant perspectives in such analyses. The relationship matrix in the quality function deployment (QFD) method provides an excellent tool for aligning important concepts and linking processes. This report suggests an operational strategy for the selection of a new production technology that integrates the market trends, competitive and operational strategies, as well as manufacturing attributes by using the relationship matrix in the QFD method and also describes how this robust approach has been applied to the selection of new manufacturing technology in a Taiwanese company. This selection substantiates our assertion that the proposed framework and procedures do in fact meet the real requirements of an individual commercial entity as well as ensuring a competitive edge.

[1]  Marthinus W. Pretorius,et al.  A model for the assessment of new technology for the manufacturing enterprise , 2000 .

[2]  Mustafa Yurdakul,et al.  Selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming model , 2004 .

[3]  Mario T. Tabucanon,et al.  Decision support system for multicriteria machine selection for flexible manufacturing systems , 1994 .

[4]  Q. Cao,et al.  Empirical study of the relationship between operations strategy and information systems strategic orientation in an e-commerce environment , 2004 .

[5]  Amiya K. Chakravarty,et al.  Strategic acquisition of new manufacturing technology: a review and research framework , 1992 .

[6]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  The connectance model revisited: a tool for manufacturing objective deployment , 2004 .

[7]  Timothy L. Smunt,et al.  Optimal Acquisition of Automated Flexible Manufacturing Processes , 1989, Oper. Res..

[8]  T. Feo,et al.  An algorithm for the manufacturing equipment selection problem , 1991 .

[9]  G. Dromart,et al.  A Model , 2009 .

[10]  Andreas C. Soteriou,et al.  Capacity acquisition and disposal with discrete facility sizes , 1994 .

[11]  Kamran Rezaie,et al.  A mathematical model for optimal and phased implementation of flexible manufacturing systems , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..

[12]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice , 1990 .

[13]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Optimal Acquisition of FMS Technology Subject to Technological Progress , 1991 .

[14]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system , 2002 .

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[16]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs , 1997 .

[17]  M Kakati,et al.  Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology , 1997 .

[18]  N. Dubin Mathematical Model , 2022 .

[19]  J. C. Bean,et al.  Parallel replacement under capital rationing constraints , 1994 .

[20]  S. H. Kim,et al.  A methodology of constructing a decision path for IT investment , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[21]  N. Raman,et al.  FMS planning decisions, operating flexibilities, and system performance , 1995 .

[22]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[23]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A combined AHP}GP model for qualitycontrol sy stems , 2001 .

[24]  Jeffrey G. Miller,et al.  Implementing manufacturing strategic planning , 1989 .

[25]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Optimal investment in product-flexible manufacturing capacity , 1990 .

[26]  Bhaskaran Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Decision support system for machining center selection , 2004 .

[27]  M. Schniederjans,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  L. Röller,et al.  Competition and Investment in Flexible Technologies , 1993 .

[29]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  A generalized multimachine replacement model for flexible automation investments , 1992 .

[30]  Mihkel M. Tombak,et al.  A strategic analysis of flexible manufacturing systems , 1990 .

[31]  Bruce W. Lamar,et al.  A strategic investment model for phased implementation of flexible manufacturing systems , 1999 .