Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior

Current diagnostic systems for mental disorders were established before the tools of neuroscience were available, and although they have improved the reliability of psychiatric classification, progress toward the discovery of disease etiologies and novel approaches to treatment and prevention may benefit from alternative conceptualizations of mental disorders. The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative is the centerpiece of NIMH's effort to achieve its strategic goal of developing new methods to classify mental disorders for research purposes. The RDoC matrix provides a research framework that encourages investigators to reorient their research perspective by taking a dimensional approach to the study of the genetic, neural, and behavioral features of mental disorders, RDoCs integrative approach includes cognition along with social processes, arousal/regulatory systems, and negative and positive valence systems as the major domains, because these neurobehavioral systems have all evolved to serve the motivational and adaptive needs of the organism. With its focus on neural circuits informed by the growing evidence of the neurodevelopmental nature of many disorders and its capacity to capture the patterns of co-occurrence of behaviors and symptoms, the RDoC approach holds promise to advance our understanding of the nature of mental disorders.

[1]  T. Insel,et al.  Wesleyan University From the SelectedWorks of Charles A . Sanislow , Ph . D . 2010 Research Domain Criteria ( RDoC ) : Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders , 2018 .

[2]  S. Hyman Can neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  R. Krueger,et al.  Reinterpreting comorbidity: a model-based approach to understanding and classifying psychopathology. , 2006, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[4]  S. Siris Depression in schizophrenia: perspective in the era of "Atypical" antipsychotic agents. , 2000, The American journal of psychiatry.

[5]  H. C. Cromwell,et al.  Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: How overuse/misuse of the term ‘cognition’ and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[6]  D. Offord,et al.  DSM-IV internal construct validity: when a taxonomy meets data. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[7]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  Neocortical excitation/inhibition balance in information processing and social dysfunction , 2011, Nature.

[8]  Denny Borsboom,et al.  Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. , 2008, Journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  Bart P F Rutten,et al.  Epigenetic mediation of environmental influences in major psychotic disorders. , 2009, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[10]  W. Fenton,et al.  Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia: NIMH MATRICS initiative to support the development of agents for improving cognition in schizophrenia , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[11]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Mixture Model Clustering of Phenotype Features Reveals Evidence for Association of DTNBP1 to a Specific Subtype of Schizophrenia , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[12]  S. Hyman,et al.  The diagnosis of mental disorders: the problem of reification. , 2010, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[13]  N. Craddock,et al.  Neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia , 2011, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[14]  C. Carter,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience-based approaches to measuring and improving treatment effects on cognition in schizophrenia: the CNTRICS initiative. , 2007, Schizophrenia bulletin.