ECAP analysis in cochlear implant patients as a function of patient's age and electrode-design.

[1]  Nithreen M. Said,et al.  Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children. , 2015, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[2]  R. Hamerschmidt,et al.  Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry and Neural Recovery Function: a Comparative Study between Adults and Children , 2014, International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.

[3]  T. Tung,et al.  Impedance and Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Drop within 24 Hours after Cochlear Implantation , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Carolyn J. Brown,et al.  Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Margaret W Skinner,et al.  Relation Between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[6]  Paul J Abbas,et al.  Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  M Polak,et al.  ECAP, ESR and Subjective Levels for Two Different Nucleus 24 Electrode Arrays , 2005, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  Michael Tykocinski,et al.  Threshold, Comfortable Level and Impedance Changes as a Function of Electrode-Modiolar Distance , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Electrode Impedance, the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential, and Behavioral Measures in Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Users , 2001, Ear and hearing.