A RULES APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF TELEVISION AND SOCIETY

A rule-based theoretical framework is presented as an alternative to scientific laws or purely interpretive approaches for examination of the activities undertaken by television audiences. Communication rules, which explains human actions in terms of its pragmatic and normative rather than causal features, is productively applied to the study of audience activity at two levels—the family and the larger society. Habitual, parametric, and tactical rule types are defined and described in relation to basic mass communication processes. Television-related interpersonal activities in the home are shown to be rule-governed while audience members and sources of media programming at the societal level are revealed to engage in rule-based interaction that perpetuates selected ideologies and their accompanying lifestyle models. Communication rules is proposed as a viable approach for resolving fundamental problems in mass communication theory building, including the “effects” vs. “uses” argument regarding direction of influence, and conceptual and methodological differences that have often polarized media critics and empiricists.

[1]  J. Cappella TALK AND SILENCE SEQUENCES IN INFORMAL CONVERSATIONS II , 1979 .

[2]  Rebecca H. Holman,et al.  Perspectives on human communication , 1978 .

[3]  George Comstock,et al.  Television and Human Behavior , 1975 .

[4]  W. Pearce Consensual Rules in Interpersonal Communication: A Reply to Cushman and Whiting. , 1973 .

[5]  T. Mccain,et al.  Controlling Children's Television Viewing: Predictors of Family Television Rules and Their Relationship to Family Communication Patterns. , 1980 .

[6]  D. Sallach Class Domination and Ideological Hegemony , 1973 .

[7]  Barbara Wand TELEVISION VIEWING AND FAMILY CHOICE DIFFERENCES , 1968 .

[8]  Leonard N. Reid Viewing rules as mediating factors of children's responses to commercials , 1979 .

[9]  Ronald J. Compesi Gratifications of Daytime TV Serial Viewers , 1980 .

[10]  Donald P. Cushman,et al.  Creating and confronting social order: A comparison of rules perspectives , 1980 .

[11]  G. Noble Children in front of the small screen , 1975 .

[12]  D. Horton,et al.  Mass communication and para-social interaction; observations on intimacy at a distance. , 1956, Psychiatry.

[13]  Herbert Marcuse One-Dimensional Man , 1964 .

[14]  James Lull,et al.  Choosing television programs by family vote , 1978 .

[15]  Donald P. Cushman,et al.  An Approach to Communication Theory: Toward Consensus on Rules , 1972 .

[16]  James Lull,et al.  Family Communication Patterns and the Social Uses of Television , 1980 .

[17]  Les Brown Television;: The business behind the box , 1971 .

[18]  Steven H. Chaffee,et al.  Interpersonal Factors in Adolescent Television Use , 1976 .

[19]  Donald P. Cushman The rules perspective as a theoretical basis for the study of human communication , 1977 .

[20]  Lawrence H. Streicher,et al.  Children Talk About Television , 1974 .

[21]  W. Barnett Pearce,et al.  Generality and Necessity in Three Types of Theory About Human Communication, With Special Attention to Rules Theory. , 1977 .

[22]  Herbert I. Schiller,et al.  The Mind Managers. , 1976 .

[23]  H. Niven Who in the Family Selects the TV Program? , 1960 .

[24]  C. Levitt,et al.  "The Whole World Is Watching": Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left , 1981 .

[25]  Ellen Wartella Children communicating : media and development of thought, speech, understanding , 1979 .

[26]  Herbert I. Schiller,et al.  Communication and Cultural Domination , 2017 .

[27]  Charles R. Wright,et al.  Television and the public , 1974 .

[28]  Jack M. McLeod,et al.  Parental Influences On Adolescent Media Use , 1971 .

[29]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[30]  Stuart J. Sigman,et al.  ON COMMUNICATION RULES FROM A SOCIAL PERSPECTIVE , 1980 .

[31]  Todd Gitlin Prime Time Ideology: The Hegemonic Process in Television Entertainment , 1979 .

[32]  J. Lull THE SOCIAL USES OF TELEVISION , 1980 .