Two DNA-encoded strategies for increasing expression with opposing effects on promoter dynamics and transcriptional noise

Individual cells from a genetically identical population exhibit substantial variation in gene expression. A significant part of this variation is due to noise in the process of transcription that is intrinsic to each gene, and is determined by factors such as the rate with which the promoter transitions between transcriptionally active and inactive states, and the number of transcripts produced during the active state. However, we have a limited understanding of how the DNA sequence affects such promoter dynamics. Here, we used single-cell time-lapse microscopy to compare the effect on transcriptional dynamics of two distinct types of sequence changes in the promoter that can each increase the mean expression of a cell population by similar amounts but through different mechanisms. We show that increasing expression by strengthening a transcription factor binding site results in slower promoter dynamics and higher noise as compared with increasing expression by adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences. Our results suggest that when achieving the same mean expression, the strategy of using stronger binding sites results in a larger number of transcripts produced from the active state, whereas the strategy of adding nucleosome-disfavoring sequences results in a higher frequency of promoter transitions between active and inactive states. In the latter strategy, this increased sampling of the active state likely reduces the expression variability of the cell population. Our study thus demonstrates the effect of cis-regulatory elements on expression variability and points to concrete types of sequence changes that may allow partial decoupling of expression level and noise.

[1]  R. Milo,et al.  Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells , 2006, Nature.

[2]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[3]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes , 2006, Genome Biology.

[4]  J. Collins,et al.  Tuning and controlling gene expression noise in synthetic gene networks , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[5]  N. Barkai,et al.  Two strategies for gene regulation by promoter nucleosomes. , 2008, Genome research.

[6]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Phenotypic consequences of promoter-mediated transcriptional noise. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[7]  G. Balázsi,et al.  Negative autoregulation linearizes the dose–response and suppresses the heterogeneity of gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2022 .

[10]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2011 .

[11]  Bin Wu,et al.  Real-Time Observation of Transcription Initiation and Elongation on an Endogenous Yeast Gene , 2011, Science.

[12]  Klaus Aktories,et al.  Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010 .

[13]  E. Segal,et al.  Poly(da:dt) Tracts: Major Determinants of Nucleosome Organization This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Protein-nucleic Acid Interactions Edited , 2022 .

[14]  F. Cross,et al.  Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[15]  M. Ehrenberg,et al.  Random signal fluctuations can reduce random fluctuations in regulated components of chemical regulatory networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[16]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Noise in protein expression scales with natural protein abundance , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Compensation for differences in gene copy number among yeast ribosomal proteins is encoded within their promoters. , 2011, Genome research.

[18]  Yaniv Lubling,et al.  Distinct Modes of Regulation by Chromatin Encoded through Nucleosome Positioning Signals , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[19]  E. Cox,et al.  Real-Time Kinetics of Gene Activity in Individual Bacteria , 2005, Cell.

[20]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Noise–mean relationship in mutated promoters , 2012, Genome research.

[21]  Paul J. Choi,et al.  Quantifying E. coli Proteome and Transcriptome with Single-Molecule Sensitivity in Single Cells , 2010, Science.

[22]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[23]  J. Collins,et al.  Combinatorial promoter design for engineering noisy gene expression , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[25]  N. Friedman,et al.  Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level , 2006, Nature.

[26]  V. Iyer,et al.  Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[27]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Linking stochastic dynamics to population distribution: an analytical framework of gene expression. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[28]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[29]  Young-Joon Kim,et al.  Intrinsic variability of gene expression encoded in nucleosome positioning sequences , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[30]  Tsz-Leung To,et al.  Noise Can Induce Bimodality in Positive Transcriptional Feedback Loops Without Bistability , 2010, Science.

[31]  Eran Segal,et al.  Manipulating nucleosome disfavoring sequences allows fine-tune regulation of gene expression in yeast , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Nacho Molina,et al.  Mammalian Genes Are Transcribed with Widely Different Bursting Kinetics , 2011, Science.

[33]  I. Ross,et al.  Transcription of individual genes in eukaryotic cells occurs randomly and infrequently , 1994, Immunology and cell biology.