Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predicts Left Ventricular Assist Device Operative Transfusion Requirements, Morbidity, and Mortality

Background— The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) predicts events in cirrhotic subjects undergoing major surgery and may offer similar prognostication in left ventricular assist device candidates with comparable degrees of multisystem dysfunction. Methods and Results— Preoperative MELD scores were calculated for subjects enrolled in the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) mechanical circulatory support database. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate the ability of patient characteristics, laboratory data (including MELD scores), and hemodynamic measurements to predict total perioperative blood product exposure and operative mortality. The ability of preoperative MELD scores to predict operative mortality was evaluated in subjects enrolled in the Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS), and results were compared with those from the UMHS cohort. The mean±SD MELD scores for the UMHS (n=211) and INTERMACS (n=324) cohorts were 13.7±6.1 and 15.2±5.8, respectively, with 29 (14%) and 19 (6%) perioperative deaths. In the UMHS cohort, median total perioperative blood product exposure was 74 units (25th and 75th percentiles, 44 and 120 units). Each 5-unit MELD score increase was associated with 15.1±3.8 units (&bgr;±SE) of total perioperative blood product exposure. Each 10-unit increase in total perioperative blood product exposure increased the odds of operative death (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.10). Odds ratios, measuring the ability of MELD scores to predict perioperative mortality, were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.0) and 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.1) per 5 MELD units for the UMHS and INTERMACS cohorts, respectively. When MELD scores were dichotomized as ≥17 and <17, risk-adjusted Cox proportional-hazard ratios for 6-month mortality were 2.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.3) and 2.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 5.4) for the UMHS and INTERMACS cohorts, respectively. Conclusion— The MELD score identified left ventricular assist device candidates at high risk for perioperative bleeding and mortality.

[1]  D. McKenna,et al.  HLA alloimmunization in patients requiring ventricular assist device support. , 2002, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[2]  S. Russell,et al.  Influence of pretransplant panel-reactive antibody on outcomes in 8,160 heart transplant recipients in recent era. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  R. Kormos,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: third annual report--2005. , 2005, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[4]  G. Hicks,et al.  Homologous blood transfusion as a risk factor for postoperative infection after coronary artery bypass graft operations. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Left ventricular assist devices and bleeding: adding insult to injury. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  Robert L. Kormos,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support device database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: first annual report--2003. , 2003, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  P. Kamath,et al.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts , 2000, Hepatology.

[8]  Chris A Rogers,et al.  Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having Cardiac Surgery , 2007, Circulation.

[9]  R. Wiesner,et al.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[10]  T. Therneau,et al.  Risk factors for mortality after surgery in patients with cirrhosis. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[11]  J. Connor,et al.  Predicting outcome after cardiac surgery in patients with cirrhosis: a comparison of Child-Pugh and MELD scores. , 2004, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[12]  M C Oz,et al.  Platelet transfusions are associated with the development of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I antibodies in patients with left ventricular assist support. , 1998, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  J. Hentz,et al.  A Comparison of Transfusion Requirements Between Living Donation and Cadaveric Donation Liver Transplantation: Relationship to Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score and Baseline Coagulation Status , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  M. Deng,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation , 2003, Current opinion in cardiology.

[15]  R. Steadman,et al.  Preoperative characteristics and intraoperative transfusion and vasopressor requirements in patients with low vs. high MELD scores , 2006, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[16]  M. Oz,et al.  Use of aprotinin in LVAD recipients reduces blood loss, blood use, and perioperative mortality. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  T M Therneau,et al.  A model to predict survival in patients with end‐stage liver disease , 2001, Hepatology.

[18]  D. Hearse,et al.  Thromboxane A2 mediates pulmonary hypertension after cardiopulmonary bypass in the rabbit. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  R. Kormos,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Database of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Third Annual Report—2005⁎ ⁎All figures and tables from this report, and a more comprehensive set of ISHLT registry slides are available at www.ishlt.org/registries/ , 2005 .

[20]  N. Heaton,et al.  Change in model for end‐stage liver disease score on the transplant waiting list predicts survival in patients undergoing liver transplantation , 2006, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[21]  A. Befeler,et al.  The safety of intra-abdominal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: model for end-stage liver disease score is superior to Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification in predicting outcome. , 2005, Archives of surgery.

[22]  N G Smedira,et al.  Factors influencing HLA sensitization in implantable LVAD recipients. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  R. Adams,et al.  Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Predicts Nontransplant Surgical Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[24]  A. Pavie,et al.  Preventing, minimizing, and managing postoperative bleeding. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.