An experimental and numerical investigation of the ballistic response of multi-level armour against armour piercing projectiles

Abstract This research deals with the experimental and numerical investigation of ballistic protection provided by a combination of perforated and base armour plates. A 7.62 mm armour piercing projectile was used during the experimentation to determine the ballistic response of an aluminum base armour plate and a combination of steel perforated and aluminum base armour plate. The armour piercing projectiles were able to penetrate the base armour plate while the combination of perforated and base armour plates was able to stop the penetration of the armour piercing projectile. A finite element method based numerical model was developed to investigate the defeating phenomenon of perforated and base armour plate combination. The brittle fracture caused by the bending of the projectile core due to the asymmetric impact was predicted and the resulting fragments of the projectile were unable to penetrate the base armour plate. Craters were formed on the surface of the base armour plate from the impact of the projectile fragments. The numerical model was able to predict the hole growth and penetration of projectile when only the base armour plate was impacted by the projectile.

[1]  Radosław Trębiński,et al.  Methodology for experimental verification of steel armour impact modelling , 2017 .

[2]  D. Scheffler Modeling the Effect of Penetrator Nose Shape on Threshold Velocity for Thick Aluminum Targets. , 1997 .

[4]  Ahmed Benallal,et al.  Flow and fracture characteristics of aluminium alloy AA5083–H116 as function of strain rate, temperature and triaxiality , 2004 .

[5]  Jonas A. Zukas,et al.  Introduction to Hydrocodes , 2004 .

[6]  Bülent Ekici,et al.  Ballistic resistance of high hardness armor steels against 7.62 mm armor piercing ammunition , 2013 .

[7]  Bülent Ekici,et al.  Optimization of high hardness perforated steel armor plates using finite element and response surface methods , 2017 .

[8]  T. Børvik,et al.  Low velocity perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates , 2009 .

[9]  E. Dekel,et al.  Revisiting the perforation of ductile plates by sharp-nosed rigid projectiles , 2010 .

[10]  A. Patnaik,et al.  Comparison of ballistic performances of Al2O3 and AlN ceramics , 2016 .

[11]  Zvi Rosenberg,et al.  On the perforation of aluminum plates by 7.62 mm APM2 projectiles , 2016 .

[12]  V. Paris,et al.  Fragmentation of armor piercing steel projectiles upon oblique perforation of steel plates , 2012 .

[13]  S. J. Cimpoeru,et al.  The ballistic performance of an ultra-high hardness armour steel: An experimental investigation , 2016 .

[14]  Joseph R. Davis Properties and selection : nonferrous alloys and special-purpose materials , 1990 .

[15]  Magnus Langseth,et al.  Perforation of AA5083-H116 aluminium plates with conical-nose steel projectiles : Calculations , 2009 .

[16]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures , 1985 .

[17]  A. Taşdemirci,et al.  Ballistic behavior of high hardness perforated armor plates against 7.62 mm armor piercing projectile , 2014 .