Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings.

OBJECTIVE To assess differences in the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) among medical specialties and practice settings. METHODS A cross-sectional retrospective study using nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for the period 2003-2010 was performed. Bivariate and multivariate analyzes compared EMR use among physicians of 14 specialties and assessed variation by practice setting. Differences in EMR use by geographic region, patient characteristics, and physician office settings were also assessed. RESULTS Bivariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated increased EMR use from 2003 to 2010, with 16% reporting at least partial use in 2003, rising to 52% in 2010 (p<0.001). Cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons, urologists, and family/general practitioners had higher frequencies of EMR use whereas psychiatrists, ophthalmologists, and dermatologists had the lowest EMR use. Employed physicians had higher EMR uptake than physicians who owned their practice (48% vs 31%, p<0.001). EMR uptake was lower among solo practitioners (23%) than non-solo practitioners (42%, p<0.001). Practices owned by Health Maintenance Organizations had higher frequencies of EMR use (83%) than practices owned by physicians, community health centers, or academic centers (all <45%, p<0.001). Patient demographics did not affect EMR use (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Uptake of EMR is increasing, although it is significantly slower in dermatology, ophthalmology, and psychiatry. Solo practitioners and owners of a practice have low frequencies of EMR use compared with non-solo practitioners and those who do not own their practice. Despite incentives for EMR adoption, physicians should carefully weigh which, if any, EMR to adopt in their practices.

[1]  R. Stafford,et al.  Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Electronic health records in ambulatory care--a national survey of physicians. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Gans,et al.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[4]  Robin C. Meili,et al.  Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. , 2005, Health affairs.

[5]  S. Haque.  Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the East London and City Health Authority Ethic Committee. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. , 2011 .

[6]  D. Blumenthal.  Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. , 2009, The West Virginia medical journal.

[7]  R. Steinbrook.  Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Anne F. Kittler,et al.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Bates,et al.  Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[10]  Víctor H. Castillo,et al.  A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review , 2010, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[11]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[12]  L. Casalino,et al.  Small and medium-size physician practices use few patient-centered medical home processes. , 2011, Health affairs.

[13]  Qingxia Chen,et al.  An Electronic Medical Record in Primary Care: Impact on Satisfaction, Work Efficiency and Clinic Processes , 2006, AMIA.

[14]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2013. , 2014, NCHS data brief.

[15]  S. Schoenbaum,et al.  Information technologies: when will they make it into physicians' black bags? , 2004, MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine.

[16]  C. Burt,et al.  Which physicians and practices are using electronic medical records? , 2005, Health affairs.

[17]  Why I love my EMR. , 2002, Family practice management.

[18]  P. Teichman,et al.  Improving anticoagulation management at the point of care. , 2002, Family practice management.

[19]  E. Hing,et al.  Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2011. , 2011, NCHS data brief.

[20]  Felicia M Bowens,et al.  Health information technology: integration of clinical workflow into meaningful use of electronic health records. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[21]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. , 2011, Health affairs.

[22]  Chun-Ju Hsiao,et al.  Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria. , 2012, Health affairs.

[23]  E. Hing,et al.  Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012. , 2012, NCHS data brief.

[24]  William R Doucette,et al.  Family physician perceptions of personal health records. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[25]  E. Keeler,et al.  Costs and benefits of health information technology. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[26]  Cynthia S. Gadd,et al.  Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR: a longitudinal, multi-practice study , 2001, AMIA.