The First Letter Position Effect in Visual Word Recognition: The Role of Spatial Attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
Derek Besner | Michele Scaltritti | David A Balota | Andrew J Aschenbrenner | Alexandra J Weigand | D. Balota | D. Besner | M. Scaltritti | Andrew J. Aschenbrenner | A. Weigand
[1] Evan F. Risko,et al. Spatial attention as a necessary preliminary to early processes in reading. , 2005, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.
[2] P. Merikle,et al. On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. , 1971, Canadian journal of psychology.
[3] Keith E. Stanovich,et al. Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability , 1984 .
[4] James S. Adelman,et al. Letters in Words Are Read Simultaneously, Not in Left-to-Right Sequence , 2010, Psychological science.
[5] Arthur M. Jacobs,et al. Letter legibility and visual word recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.
[6] Derek Besner,et al. Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[7] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.
[8] S. Gori,et al. A Causal Link between Visual Spatial Attention and Reading Acquisition , 2012, Current Biology.
[9] James L. McClelland,et al. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.
[10] J. Ziegler,et al. A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage. , 2016, Journal of experimental child psychology.
[11] Colin J Davis,et al. The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.
[12] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[13] J. Grainger,et al. Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[14] Rebecca L Johnson,et al. The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. , 2012, Acta psychologica.
[15] Manuel Perea,et al. The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.
[16] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .
[17] R. Desimone,et al. Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons , 2000, Neuron.
[18] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] G. McConkie,et al. Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[20] Derek Besner,et al. Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[21] M Mason,et al. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] James S Adelman,et al. Letters in time and retinotopic space. , 2011, Psychological review.
[23] D. Barr,et al. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[24] James L. McClelland,et al. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.
[25] James A. Bovaird,et al. On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research , 2007, Behavior research methods.
[26] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A Vision of Reading , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[27] James J. Masanz,et al. LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 1998 .
[28] Michele Scaltritti,et al. Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[29] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. , 2012, Acta psychologica.
[30] G. Humphreys,et al. The Use of Abstract Graphemic Information in Lexical Access , 1981 .
[31] C. Whitney. How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[32] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[33] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .
[34] E. Lovelace. Attributes that come to mind in the TOT state. , 1987 .
[35] J. Grainger,et al. Flank to the left, flank to the right: Testing the modified receptive field hypothesis of letter-specific crowding , 2013 .
[36] K. Rayner. Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.
[37] James J. Clark,et al. Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading , 1999, Vision Research.
[38] J. C. Johnston,et al. Perception of Letters in Words: Seek Not and Ye Shall Find , 1974, Science.
[39] L. Abrams,et al. Does priming specific syllables during tip-of-the-tongue states facilitate word retrieval in older adults? , 2002, Psychology and aging.
[40] J. C. Johnston,et al. The role of spatial attention in visual word processing. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[41] K. Forster,et al. Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): still no identification without attention. , 2004, Psychological review.
[42] H. H. Clark. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .
[43] C. Mann,et al. A Practical Treatise on Diseases of the Skin , 1889, Atlanta Medical and Surgical Journal (1884).
[44] D. Bates,et al. Parsimonious Mixed Models , 2015, 1506.04967.
[45] William Lidwell,et al. Serial Position Effects , 2019 .
[46] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[47] Marco Zorzi,et al. Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.
[48] D. Green,et al. Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.
[49] M Coltheart,et al. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.
[50] Alan S. Brown,et al. A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.