A three-dimensional, anatomically detailed foot model: a foundation for a finite element simulation and means of quantifying foot-bone position.

We generated an anatomically detailed, three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of a human foot from 286 computerized topographic (CT) images. For each bone, 2-D cross-sectional data were obtained and aligned to form a stacked image model. We calculated the inertial matrix of each bone from the stacked image model and used it to determine the principal axes. Relative angles between the principal axes of the bones were employed to describe the shape of the foot, i.e., the relationships between the bones of the foot. A 3-D surface model was generated from the stacked image models and a detailed 3-D mesh for each bone was created. Additionally, the representative geometry of the plantar soft tissue was obtained from the CT scans, while the geometries of the cartilage between bones were obtained from the 3-D surface bone models. This model served dual purposes: it formed the anatomical foundation for a future finite element model of the human foot and we used it to objectively quantify foot shape using the relationships between the principal axes of the foot bones.

[1]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Structural and functional predictors of regional peak pressures under the foot during walking. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model of the Human Ankle: Development and Preliminary Application to Axial Impulsive Loading , 1996 .

[4]  M. K. Patil,et al.  Three-dimensional foot modeling and analysis of stresses in normal and early stage Hansen's disease with muscle paralysis. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  J T Deland,et al.  Pes Planus in Patients with Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency: Asymptomatic Versus Symptomatic Foot , 1997, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  B. Sangeorzan,et al.  Effect of Calcaneal Lengthening on Relationships among the Hindfoot, Midfoot, and Forefoot* , 1993, Foot & ankle.

[7]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  A Madymo Model of the Foot and Leg for Local Impacts , 1999 .

[8]  Colin E. Thomson,et al.  An investigation into the reliability of the valgus index and its validity as a clinical measurement , 1994 .

[9]  L. Staheli,et al.  The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. , 1987, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  R D Crowninshield,et al.  An analysis of soft tissue loading in the foot--a preliminary report. , 1981, Bulletin of prosthetics research.

[11]  Kennerly Digges,et al.  Investigating Ankle Injury Mechanisms in Offset Frontal Collisions Utilizing Computer Modeling and Case-Study Data , 1999 .

[12]  H J Hillstrom,et al.  Foot type biomechanics. comparison of planus and rectus foot types. , 1996, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[13]  R. Bordelon,et al.  Correction of Hypermobile Flatfoot in Children by Molded Insert , 1980, Foot & ankle.

[14]  François Lavaste,et al.  Foot and Ankle Finite Element Modeling Using Ct-Scan Data , 1999 .

[15]  Lew C. Schon,et al.  Tendon Transfer Combined with Calcaneal Osteotomy for Treatment of Posterior Tibial Tendon Insufficiency: A Radiological Investigation , 1995, Foot & ankle international.

[16]  N. Gould,et al.  Graphing the Adult Foot and Ankle , 1982, Foot & ankle.

[17]  William Raymond Ledoux A biomechanical model of the human foot with emphasis on the plantar soft tissue , 1999 .

[18]  E. Welton The Harris and Beath Footprint: Interpretation and Clinical Value , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[19]  Dwight Alan Meglan,et al.  Enhanced analysis of human locomotion , 1991 .

[20]  T Y Shiang,et al.  The effect of insoles in therapeutic footwear--a finite element approach. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  D A Nawoczenski,et al.  Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  W. Chu,et al.  The use of arch index to characterize arch height: a digital image processing approach , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  A Grasso,et al.  [Computed tomography demonstration++ of calcaneal morphotypes in plantar arch abnormalities]. , 1993, La Radiologia medica.

[24]  B A MacWilliams,et al.  Defining flatfoot. , 1999, Foot & ankle international.

[25]  G Geoffroy,et al.  Roentgenographs Study of Cavus Foot Deformity in Friedreich Ataxia Patients: Preliminary Report , 1982, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[26]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Footprint Parameters as a Measure of Arch Height , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[27]  T. Huang,et al.  Subtalar distractional realignment arthrodesis with wedge bone grafting and lateral decompression for calcaneal malunion. , 1998, Journal of Trauma.

[28]  Dominique Cesari,et al.  Improvement of Numerical Ankle/Foot Model: Modeling of Deformable Bone , 1997 .