Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

A general theoretical approach to the development of zero-thickness encapsulation models for contrast microbubbles is proposed. The approach describes a procedure that allows one to recast available rheological laws from the bulk form to a surface form which is used in a modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation governing the radial dynamics of a contrast microbubble. By the use of the proposed procedure, the testing of different rheological laws for encapsulation can be carried out. Challenges of existing shell models for lipid-encapsulated microbubbles, such as the dependence of shell parameters on the initial bubble radius and the "compression-only" behavior, are discussed. Analysis of the rheological behavior of lipid encapsulation is made by using experimental radius-time curves for lipid-coated microbubbles with radii in the range 1.2-2.5 microm. The curves were acquired for a research phospholipid-coated contrast agent insonified with a 20 cycle, 3.0 MHz, 100 kPa acoustic pulse. The fitting of the experimental data by a model which treats the shell as a viscoelastic solid gives the values of the shell surface viscosity increasing from 0.30 x 10(-8) kg/s to 2.63 x 10(-8) kg/s for the range of bubble radii, indicated above. The shell surface elastic modulus increases from 0.054 N/m to 0.37 N/m. It is proposed that this increase may be a result of the lipid coating possessing the properties of both a shear-thinning and a strain-softening material. We hypothesize that these complicated rheological properties do not allow the existing shell models to satisfactorily describe the dynamics of lipid encapsulation. In the existing shell models, the viscous and the elastic shell terms have the linear form which assumes that the viscous and the elastic stresses acting inside the lipid shell are proportional to the shell shear rate and the shell strain, respectively, with constant coefficients of proportionality. The analysis performed in the present paper suggests that a more general, nonlinear theory may be more appropriate. It is shown that the use of the nonlinear theory for shell viscosity allows one to model the "compression-only" behavior. As an example, the results of the simulation for a 2.03 microm radius bubble insonified with a 6 cycle, 1.8 MHz, 100 kPa acoustic pulse are given. These parameters correspond to the acoustic conditions under which the "compression-only" behavior was observed by de Jong et al. [Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 (2007) 653-656]. It is also shown that the use of the Cross law for the modeling of the shear-thinning behavior of shell viscosity reduces the variance of experimentally estimated values of the shell viscosity and its dependence on the initial bubble radius.

[1]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  N. Pelekasis,et al.  Nonlinear radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles subject to ultrasound: the effect of membrane constitutive law. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Charles T. Lancée,et al.  Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations , 1994 .

[4]  K. Chetty,et al.  P1F-4 High Speed Optical Observations and Simulation Results of Lipid Based Microbubbles at Low Insonation Pressures , 2006, 2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[5]  L. Hoff,et al.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Thomas L. Szabo,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging: Inside Out , 2004 .

[7]  Flemming Forsberg,et al.  Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications , 2001 .

[8]  Nico de Jong,et al.  The onset of microbubble vibration. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  C. Brebbia,et al.  Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow , 2001 .

[10]  N de Jong,et al.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres. , 1993, Ultrasonics.

[11]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Nico de Jong,et al.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Charles C. Church,et al.  The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles , 1995 .

[14]  P. Dayton,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  N de Jong,et al.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  P. Dayton,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2007 .

[17]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[18]  A. Nadim,et al.  Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids , 2002 .

[19]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[21]  Detlef Lohse,et al.  A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture , 2005 .

[22]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[24]  Dhiman Chatterjee,et al.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M. M. Cross Rheology of non-Newtonian fluids: A new flow equation for pseudoplastic systems , 1965 .

[27]  K. Chawla,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Materials , 1998 .

[28]  D. Joseph,et al.  Principles of non-Newtonian fluid mechanics , 1974 .

[29]  Harald Becher,et al.  Handbook of Contrast Echocardiography: Left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion , 2000 .