Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials.

The goal of the present study was to delineate phonology's role in silent reading using event-related brain potential (ERP) techniques. Terminal endings of high cloze sentences were manipulated in four conditions in which the terminal word was: (1) the high cloze ending and thus orthographically, phonologically and semantically congruent (e.g., The gambler had a streak of bad luck.); (2) a pseudohomophone that was orthographically incongruent, but was phonologically congruent to the anticipated ending (e.g., The ship disappeared into the thick phog [fog].); (3) a word that was orthographically, phonologically and semantically incongruent to expectations (e.g., The dog chased the cat up the Queen [tree].); or (4) a nonword and consequently orthographically, phonologically and semantically incongruent to expectations (e.g., The gas station is about two miles down the bole [road].). A N270 was elicited by orthographically incongruent words and nonwords (conditions 2, 3 and 4), likely reflecting violations of orthographic form expectations, while the presence of the N400 to semantically incongruent words and nonwords (conditions 3 and 4) reflected violations of semantic expectations. The relative absence of the N400 response to pseudohomophones (condition 3) indicates that integrating word meaning with sentential context is influenced by the phonological representation of the presented letter string. The implication of these results for theories of word recognition is discussed.

[1]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[2]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Reading isolated words: No evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code , 1992, Psychological research.

[3]  M. Kutas,et al.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words , 1980, Biological Psychology.

[4]  C. Luo,et al.  Automatic activation of phonological information in reading: Evidence from the semantic relatedness decision task , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[6]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. , 1994 .

[9]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Brain Potentials as Indices of Orthographic and Phonological Interaction During word Matching , 1987 .

[10]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Semantic Cortical Activation in Dyslexic Readers , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Taft,et al.  Lack of Phonological Mediation in a Semantic Categorization Task , 1998 .

[12]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[13]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Phonological Recoding in Reading for Meaning by Adults and Children , 1988 .

[14]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[15]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Bruce F. Pennington,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[17]  L. Tan,et al.  Phonological and associative inhibition in the early stages of English word identification: Evidence from backward masking , 1999 .

[18]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. Connolly,et al.  The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[21]  Nancy K. Squires,et al.  Phonological Processing and the Role of Strategy in Silent Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 1996, Brain and Language.

[22]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  J. Ziegler,et al.  From print to meaning: an electrophysiological investigation of the role of phonology in accessing word meaning. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[24]  S. Farmer,et al.  The effects of physical and semantic incongruities on auditory event-related potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  E. T. Possing,et al.  Neural Correlates of Lexical Access during Visual Word Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .

[28]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[29]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[30]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition , 1987, Brain and Language.

[32]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing , 1982, Biological Psychology.

[33]  Jerome Rosner,et al.  The Auditory Analysis Test , 1971 .

[34]  R. Frost Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998 .

[35]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-related potential sensitivity to acoustic and semantic properties of terminal words in sentences , 1992, Brain and Language.

[36]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the interaction between orthographic and phonological information in a rhyme-judgment task , 1987, Brain and Language.

[37]  J. Connolly,et al.  Event-Related Potential Components Reflect Phonological and Semantic Processing of the Terminal Word of Spoken Sentences , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for task effects on semantic priming in auditory word processing. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[39]  Penny M. Pexman,et al.  Homophone effects in lexical decision. , 2001 .

[40]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the phonological processing of words and non-words , 1984, Neuropsychologia.