Ecosystem Services at the Farm Level—Overview, Synergies, Trade‐Offs, and Stakeholder Analysis
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Reinmuth | Ricardo Vargas-Carpintero | Moritz Wagner | S. Schmidt | E. Rezaei‐Chiyaneh | M. von Cossel | N. M. Marting Vidaurre | Jonathan Morizet‐Davis | Nirvana A. Marting Vidaurre | Valentin Schlecht | Susanne Schmidt | Kripal Singh
[1] R. Finger,et al. Biodiversity indicators for result-based agri-environmental schemes – Current state and future prospects , 2023, Agricultural Systems.
[2] R. M. Mc Donnell,et al. Editorial: Conservation of invertebrates in agricultural landscapes , 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.
[3] Bastian Winkler,et al. The True Costs and Benefits of Miscanthus Cultivation , 2022, Agronomy.
[4] B. Elbersen,et al. Defining Circular Economy Principles for Biobased Products , 2022, Sustainability.
[5] Anna F. Cord,et al. Landscape context and farm characteristics are key to farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes , 2022, Land Use Policy.
[6] N. Estrada-Carmona,et al. Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7] R. Finger,et al. A note on synthetic data for replication purposes in agricultural economics , 2022, Journal of Agricultural Economics.
[8] Noppol Arunrat,et al. Soil Microbial Diversity and Community Composition in Rice–Fish Co-Culture and Rice Monoculture Farming System , 2022, Biology.
[9] G. Beckham,et al. Lignin-first biorefining of Nordic poplar to produce cellulose fibers could displace cotton production on agricultural lands , 2022, Joule.
[10] D. Jourdain,et al. Diverse stakeholder perspectives and ecosystem services ranking: Application of the Q-methodology to Hawane Dam and Nature Reserve in Eswatini , 2022, Ecological Economics.
[11] Shoukun Dong,et al. Application of Conservation Tillage in China: A Method to Improve Climate Resilience , 2022, Agronomy.
[12] Noppol Arunrat,et al. Assessing Ecosystem Services of Rice–Fish Co-Culture and Rice Monoculture in Thailand , 2022, Agronomy.
[13] T. Tscharntke,et al. Scale-dependent effectiveness of on-field vs. off-field agri-environmental measures for wild bees , 2022, Basic and Applied Ecology.
[14] R. Huber,et al. Economic value of three grassland ecosystem services when managed at the regional and farm scale , 2022, Scientific Reports.
[15] S. Tischew,et al. Effects of wildflower strips, landscape structure and agricultural practices on wild bee assemblages – A matter of data resolution and spatial scale? , 2022, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.
[16] T. Berger,et al. Bridging the gap between models and users: A lightweight mobile interface for optimized farming decisions in interactive modeling sessions , 2022, Agricultural Systems.
[17] L. Parry,et al. From ‘prison’ to ‘paradise’? Seeking freedom at the rainforest frontier through urban–rural migration , 2022, World Development.
[18] Charis M. Galanakis,et al. Bioeconomy and green recovery in a post-COVID-19 era , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.
[19] S. Marhan,et al. Mineral-Ecological Cropping Systems—A New Approach to Improve Ecosystem Services by Farming without Chemical Synthetic Plant Protection , 2021, Agronomy.
[20] Bhupinder S. Farmaha,et al. Cover cropping and conservation tillage improve soil health in the southeastern United States , 2021, Agronomy Journal.
[21] T. Tscharntke,et al. Beyond organic farming - harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[22] A. Sadeghpour,et al. Optimizing Intercropping Systems of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum‐graecum L.) through Inoculation with Bacteria and Mycorrhizal Fungi , 2021, Advanced Sustainable Systems.
[23] A. Awasthi. A Reinterpretation of Hindu Spirituality for Addressing Environmental Problems , 2021, Religions.
[24] B. Burkhard,et al. Towards an enhanced indication of provisioning ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems , 2021, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.
[25] Xiaomin Zhou,et al. Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization , 2021 .
[26] Harun I. Gitari,et al. Intercropping—A Low Input Agricultural Strategy for Food and Environmental Security , 2021, Agronomy.
[27] R. Slotow,et al. Civic Ecology Uplifts Low-Income Communities, Improves Ecosystem Services and Well-Being, and Strengthens Social Cohesion , 2021 .
[28] M. Keil,et al. Possibly Invasive New Bioenergy Crop Silphium perfoliatum: Growth and Reproduction Are Promoted in Moist Soil , 2021, Agriculture.
[29] E. João,et al. Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[30] D. R. Raman,et al. A Midwest USA Perspective on Von Cossel et al.’s Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for a More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy , 2020, Agronomy.
[31] F. Sinclair,et al. Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review , 2020, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[32] I. Lewandowski,et al. Implementing miscanthus into farming systems: A review of agronomic practices, capital and labour demand , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
[33] K. Helming,et al. Ecosystem Services of Kettle Holes in Agricultural Landscapes , 2020, Agronomy.
[34] R. Isaacs,et al. The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis , 2020, Ecology letters.
[35] M. Cossel. Renewable Energy from Wildflowers—Perennial Wild Plant Mixtures as a Social‐Ecologically Sustainable Biomass Supply System , 2020, Advanced Sustainable Systems.
[36] Victoria Beltran,et al. Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..
[37] Jun Xie,et al. Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China , 2020 .
[38] L. Marini,et al. Seed predation intensity and stability in agro-ecosystems: Role of predator diversity and soil disturbance , 2020 .
[39] Minjuan Zhao,et al. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin’s impression , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
[40] Jablonowski,et al. Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy , 2019, Agronomy.
[41] L. Trindade,et al. Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production , 2019, Energies.
[42] A. Lázaro,et al. Landscape heterogeneity increases the spatial stability of pollination services to almond trees through the stability of pollinator visits , 2019, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.
[43] H. Haberl,et al. Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice? , 2019, Global change biology. Bioenergy.
[44] P. Meli,et al. Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: Insights from 21 case studies , 2019, Ecosystem Services.
[45] P. Ciria,et al. Identification of Arable Marginal Lands under Rainfed Conditions for Bioenergy Purposes in Spain , 2019, Sustainability.
[46] J. Thiele,et al. Bioenergy and its effects on landscape aesthetics – A survey contrasting conventional and wild crop biomass production , 2019, Biomass and Bioenergy.
[47] Emily A. Martin,et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production , 2019, Science Advances.
[48] S. Altizer,et al. Planting gardens to support insect pollinators , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[49] W. Gerwin,et al. Assessment and quantification of marginal lands for biomass production in Europe using soil-quality indicators , 2018, SOIL.
[50] Regina Birner,et al. Bioeconomy , 2018, Springer International Publishing.
[51] Joachim Ingwersen,et al. Coupling the land surface model Noah-MP with the generic crop growth model Gecros: Model description, calibration and validation , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.
[52] V. Temperton,et al. Legume Intercropping With the Bioenergy Crop Sida hermaphrodita on Marginal Soil , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..
[53] J. Kamanda,et al. Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: Is blended sustainability the way forward? , 2018 .
[54] D. Geneletti,et al. Assessing ecosystem services and biodiversity tradeoffs across agricultural landscapes in a mountain region , 2018 .
[55] Matthew J. Helmers,et al. Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[56] Philip A.E. Brey,et al. Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives , 2017 .
[57] J. Möhring,et al. Methane yield performance of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) and its suitability for legume intercropping in comparison to maize (Zea mays L.) , 2017 .
[58] Manfred J. Lexer,et al. Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis , 2017 .
[59] E. Reinmuth,et al. Modeling perceptions of climatic risk in crop production , 2017, PloS one.
[60] John M. Holland,et al. Semi-natural habitats support biological control, pollination and soil conservation in Europe. A review , 2017, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[61] Patrick L. Thompson,et al. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales , 2017, Nature.
[62] Erin M. Silva,et al. Overview of Organic Cover Crop-Based No-Tillage Technique in Europe: Farmers’ Practices and Research Challenges , 2017 .
[63] Isabelle Durance,et al. The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits , 2017 .
[64] H. Lambers,et al. Plant Functional Traits: Soil and Ecosystem Services. , 2017, Trends in plant science.
[65] Sabine Zikeli,et al. Reduced Tillage and No-Till in Organic Farming Systems, Germany—Status Quo, Potentials and Challenges , 2017 .
[66] F. Celette,et al. Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review , 2017 .
[67] V. Seufert,et al. Many shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture , 2017, Science Advances.
[68] René Montalba,et al. Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective , 2017 .
[69] Thomas Prade,et al. Perennial species mixtures for multifunctional production of biomass on marginal land , 2017 .
[70] Patrick L. Thompson,et al. Loss of habitat and connectivity erodes species diversity, ecosystem functioning, and stability in metacommunity networks , 2017 .
[71] L. Garibaldi,et al. Economic Measures of Pollination Services: Shortcomings and Future Directions. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[72] Randa Jabbour,et al. Commercial Crop Yields Reveal Strengths and Weaknesses for Organic Agriculture in the United States , 2016, PloS one.
[73] M. Vilà,et al. Mass‐flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe , 2016, Ecology letters.
[74] J. Wesseler,et al. A socioeconomic analysis of biocontrol in integrated pest management: A review of the effects of uncertainty, irreversibility and flexibility , 2016 .
[75] J. Collatz,et al. Perennial, species-rich wildflower strips enhance pest control and crop yield , 2016 .
[76] E. Bennett. Research Frontiers in Ecosystem Service Science , 2016, Ecosystems.
[77] M. Jeuffroy,et al. Undersowing winter oilseed rape with frost-sensitive legume living mulches to improve weed control , 2015 .
[78] David Kleijn,et al. The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[79] Thomas M. Brooks,et al. The Importance and Benefits of Species , 2015, Current Biology.
[80] C. Nicholls,et al. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[81] Cathy Hawes,et al. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. , 2015, The New phytologist.
[82] Lauren C. Ponisio,et al. Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[83] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape , 2015, AMBIO.
[84] A. Bernués,et al. Socio-Cultural and Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Mediterranean Mountain Agroecosystems , 2014, PloS one.
[85] Christine Woodcock,et al. Push-pull farming systems. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[86] Breno M. Freitas,et al. Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance , 2013, Science.
[87] J. Rockström,et al. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.
[88] F. Celette,et al. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[89] C. Nicholls,et al. Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.
[90] N. Crossman,et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units , 2012 .
[91] R. D. Groot,et al. The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy , 2012 .
[92] Nicholas Mirotchnick,et al. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. , 2012, Ecology letters.
[93] R. Costanza,et al. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[94] A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al. The network structure of plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. , 2012, The New phytologist.
[95] S. Carpenter,et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.
[96] M. Haugen,et al. Farm Diversification into Tourism--Implications for Social Identity?. , 2011 .
[97] Bo Deng. From Energy Gradient and Natural Selection to Biodiversity and Stability of Ecosystems , 2010 .
[98] A. Power. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[99] C. Bielders,et al. Effect of intercropping period management on runoff and erosion in a maize cropping system. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.
[100] Garry D. Peterson,et al. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[101] S. Robinson,et al. Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.
[102] F. Chapin,et al. A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.
[103] J. Peñuelas,et al. The Fluctuation Niche in Plants , 2009 .
[104] L. Lynd,et al. Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.
[105] T. Kroeger,et al. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands , 2007 .
[106] Bernhard Streit,et al. Legume cover crops as living mulches for winter wheat: Components of biomass and the control of weeds , 2007 .
[107] J. Pickett,et al. The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.
[108] S. Carpenter,et al. Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.
[109] Scott M. Swinton,et al. Evaluating Cover Crops for Benefits, Costs and Performance within Cropping System Niches , 2005 .
[110] C. S. Holling,et al. Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management , 2004 .
[111] M. Antrop. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future , 2005 .
[112] R. O'Neill,et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.
[113] 西内 光. Agroecology , 1953, Ecological Studies.
[114] M. Altieri. Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture , 1989 .