Ecosystem Services at the Farm Level—Overview, Synergies, Trade‐Offs, and Stakeholder Analysis

[1]  R. Finger,et al.  Biodiversity indicators for result-based agri-environmental schemes – Current state and future prospects , 2023, Agricultural Systems.

[2]  R. M. Mc Donnell,et al.  Editorial: Conservation of invertebrates in agricultural landscapes , 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[3]  Bastian Winkler,et al.  The True Costs and Benefits of Miscanthus Cultivation , 2022, Agronomy.

[4]  B. Elbersen,et al.  Defining Circular Economy Principles for Biobased Products , 2022, Sustainability.

[5]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Landscape context and farm characteristics are key to farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[6]  N. Estrada-Carmona,et al.  Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Finger,et al.  A note on synthetic data for replication purposes in agricultural economics , 2022, Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[8]  Noppol Arunrat,et al.  Soil Microbial Diversity and Community Composition in Rice–Fish Co-Culture and Rice Monoculture Farming System , 2022, Biology.

[9]  G. Beckham,et al.  Lignin-first biorefining of Nordic poplar to produce cellulose fibers could displace cotton production on agricultural lands , 2022, Joule.

[10]  D. Jourdain,et al.  Diverse stakeholder perspectives and ecosystem services ranking: Application of the Q-methodology to Hawane Dam and Nature Reserve in Eswatini , 2022, Ecological Economics.

[11]  Shoukun Dong,et al.  Application of Conservation Tillage in China: A Method to Improve Climate Resilience , 2022, Agronomy.

[12]  Noppol Arunrat,et al.  Assessing Ecosystem Services of Rice–Fish Co-Culture and Rice Monoculture in Thailand , 2022, Agronomy.

[13]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Scale-dependent effectiveness of on-field vs. off-field agri-environmental measures for wild bees , 2022, Basic and Applied Ecology.

[14]  R. Huber,et al.  Economic value of three grassland ecosystem services when managed at the regional and farm scale , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[15]  S. Tischew,et al.  Effects of wildflower strips, landscape structure and agricultural practices on wild bee assemblages – A matter of data resolution and spatial scale? , 2022, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[16]  T. Berger,et al.  Bridging the gap between models and users: A lightweight mobile interface for optimized farming decisions in interactive modeling sessions , 2022, Agricultural Systems.

[17]  L. Parry,et al.  From ‘prison’ to ‘paradise’? Seeking freedom at the rainforest frontier through urban–rural migration , 2022, World Development.

[18]  Charis M. Galanakis,et al.  Bioeconomy and green recovery in a post-COVID-19 era , 2021, Science of The Total Environment.

[19]  S. Marhan,et al.  Mineral-Ecological Cropping Systems—A New Approach to Improve Ecosystem Services by Farming without Chemical Synthetic Plant Protection , 2021, Agronomy.

[20]  Bhupinder S. Farmaha,et al.  Cover cropping and conservation tillage improve soil health in the southeastern United States , 2021, Agronomy Journal.

[21]  T. Tscharntke,et al.  Beyond organic farming - harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  A. Sadeghpour,et al.  Optimizing Intercropping Systems of Black Cumin (Nigella sativa L.) and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum‐graecum L.) through Inoculation with Bacteria and Mycorrhizal Fungi , 2021, Advanced Sustainable Systems.

[23]  A. Awasthi A Reinterpretation of Hindu Spirituality for Addressing Environmental Problems , 2021, Religions.

[24]  B. Burkhard,et al.  Towards an enhanced indication of provisioning ecosystem services in agro-ecosystems , 2021, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[25]  Xiaomin Zhou,et al.  Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization , 2021 .

[26]  Harun I. Gitari,et al.  Intercropping—A Low Input Agricultural Strategy for Food and Environmental Security , 2021, Agronomy.

[27]  R. Slotow,et al.  Civic Ecology Uplifts Low-Income Communities, Improves Ecosystem Services and Well-Being, and Strengthens Social Cohesion , 2021 .

[28]  M. Keil,et al.  Possibly Invasive New Bioenergy Crop Silphium perfoliatum: Growth and Reproduction Are Promoted in Moist Soil , 2021, Agriculture.

[29]  E. João,et al.  Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition , 2021, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[30]  D. R. Raman,et al.  A Midwest USA Perspective on Von Cossel et al.’s Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for a More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy , 2020, Agronomy.

[31]  F. Sinclair,et al.  Agroecological principles and elements and their implications for transitioning to sustainable food systems. A review , 2020, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[32]  I. Lewandowski,et al.  Implementing miscanthus into farming systems: A review of agronomic practices, capital and labour demand , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[33]  K. Helming,et al.  Ecosystem Services of Kettle Holes in Agricultural Landscapes , 2020, Agronomy.

[34]  R. Isaacs,et al.  The effectiveness of flower strips and hedgerows on pest control, pollination services and crop yield: a quantitative synthesis , 2020, Ecology letters.

[35]  M. Cossel Renewable Energy from Wildflowers—Perennial Wild Plant Mixtures as a Social‐Ecologically Sustainable Biomass Supply System , 2020, Advanced Sustainable Systems.

[36]  Victoria Beltran,et al.  Decision support systems for agriculture 4.0: Survey and challenges , 2020, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[37]  Jun Xie,et al.  Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China , 2020 .

[38]  L. Marini,et al.  Seed predation intensity and stability in agro-ecosystems: Role of predator diversity and soil disturbance , 2020 .

[39]  Minjuan Zhao,et al.  Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin’s impression , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  Jablonowski,et al.  Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy , 2019, Agronomy.

[41]  L. Trindade,et al.  Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production , 2019, Energies.

[42]  A. Lázaro,et al.  Landscape heterogeneity increases the spatial stability of pollination services to almond trees through the stability of pollinator visits , 2019, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[43]  H. Haberl,et al.  Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice? , 2019, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[44]  P. Meli,et al.  Applying integrated valuation of ecosystem services in Latin America: Insights from 21 case studies , 2019, Ecosystem Services.

[45]  P. Ciria,et al.  Identification of Arable Marginal Lands under Rainfed Conditions for Bioenergy Purposes in Spain , 2019, Sustainability.

[46]  J. Thiele,et al.  Bioenergy and its effects on landscape aesthetics – A survey contrasting conventional and wild crop biomass production , 2019, Biomass and Bioenergy.

[47]  Emily A. Martin,et al.  A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production , 2019, Science Advances.

[48]  S. Altizer,et al.  Planting gardens to support insect pollinators , 2019, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[49]  W. Gerwin,et al.  Assessment and quantification of marginal lands for biomass production in Europe using soil-quality indicators , 2018, SOIL.

[50]  Regina Birner,et al.  Bioeconomy , 2018, Springer International Publishing.

[51]  Joachim Ingwersen,et al.  Coupling the land surface model Noah-MP with the generic crop growth model Gecros: Model description, calibration and validation , 2018, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[52]  V. Temperton,et al.  Legume Intercropping With the Bioenergy Crop Sida hermaphrodita on Marginal Soil , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[53]  J. Kamanda,et al.  Beyond the agroecological and sustainable agricultural intensification debate: Is blended sustainability the way forward? , 2018 .

[54]  D. Geneletti,et al.  Assessing ecosystem services and biodiversity tradeoffs across agricultural landscapes in a mountain region , 2018 .

[55]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Prairie strips improve biodiversity and the delivery of multiple ecosystem services from corn–soybean croplands , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Philip A.E. Brey,et al.  Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives , 2017 .

[57]  J. Möhring,et al.  Methane yield performance of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.) and its suitability for legume intercropping in comparison to maize (Zea mays L.) , 2017 .

[58]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis , 2017 .

[59]  E. Reinmuth,et al.  Modeling perceptions of climatic risk in crop production , 2017, PloS one.

[60]  John M. Holland,et al.  Semi-natural habitats support biological control, pollination and soil conservation in Europe. A review , 2017, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[61]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales , 2017, Nature.

[62]  Erin M. Silva,et al.  Overview of Organic Cover Crop-Based No-Tillage Technique in Europe: Farmers’ Practices and Research Challenges , 2017 .

[63]  Isabelle Durance,et al.  The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits , 2017 .

[64]  H. Lambers,et al.  Plant Functional Traits: Soil and Ecosystem Services. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[65]  Sabine Zikeli,et al.  Reduced Tillage and No-Till in Organic Farming Systems, Germany—Status Quo, Potentials and Challenges , 2017 .

[66]  F. Celette,et al.  Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review , 2017 .

[67]  V. Seufert,et al.  Many shades of gray—The context-dependent performance of organic agriculture , 2017, Science Advances.

[68]  René Montalba,et al.  Technological Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture at a Crossroads: An Agroecological Perspective , 2017 .

[69]  Thomas Prade,et al.  Perennial species mixtures for multifunctional production of biomass on marginal land , 2017 .

[70]  Patrick L. Thompson,et al.  Loss of habitat and connectivity erodes species diversity, ecosystem functioning, and stability in metacommunity networks , 2017 .

[71]  L. Garibaldi,et al.  Economic Measures of Pollination Services: Shortcomings and Future Directions. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[72]  Randa Jabbour,et al.  Commercial Crop Yields Reveal Strengths and Weaknesses for Organic Agriculture in the United States , 2016, PloS one.

[73]  M. Vilà,et al.  Mass‐flowering crops dilute pollinator abundance in agricultural landscapes across Europe , 2016, Ecology letters.

[74]  J. Wesseler,et al.  A socioeconomic analysis of biocontrol in integrated pest management: A review of the effects of uncertainty, irreversibility and flexibility , 2016 .

[75]  J. Collatz,et al.  Perennial, species-rich wildflower strips enhance pest control and crop yield , 2016 .

[76]  E. Bennett Research Frontiers in Ecosystem Service Science , 2016, Ecosystems.

[77]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Undersowing winter oilseed rape with frost-sensitive legume living mulches to improve weed control , 2015 .

[78]  David Kleijn,et al.  The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[79]  Thomas M. Brooks,et al.  The Importance and Benefits of Species , 2015, Current Biology.

[80]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems , 2015, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[81]  Cathy Hawes,et al.  Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. , 2015, The New phytologist.

[82]  Lauren C. Ponisio,et al.  Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[83]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape , 2015, AMBIO.

[84]  A. Bernués,et al.  Socio-Cultural and Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Mediterranean Mountain Agroecosystems , 2014, PloS one.

[85]  Christine Woodcock,et al.  Push-pull farming systems. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[86]  Breno M. Freitas,et al.  Wild Pollinators Enhance Fruit Set of Crops Regardless of Honey Bee Abundance , 2013, Science.

[87]  J. Rockström,et al.  Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.

[88]  F. Celette,et al.  Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[89]  C. Nicholls,et al.  Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review , 2013, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[90]  N. Crossman,et al.  Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units , 2012 .

[91]  R. D. Groot,et al.  The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy , 2012 .

[92]  Nicholas Mirotchnick,et al.  Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[93]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  A. Valiente‐Banuet,et al.  The network structure of plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[95]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[96]  M. Haugen,et al.  Farm Diversification into Tourism--Implications for Social Identity?. , 2011 .

[97]  Bo Deng From Energy Gradient and Natural Selection to Biodiversity and Stability of Ecosystems , 2010 .

[98]  A. Power Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[99]  C. Bielders,et al.  Effect of intercropping period management on runoff and erosion in a maize cropping system. , 2010, Journal of environmental quality.

[100]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[102]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[103]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The Fluctuation Niche in Plants , 2009 .

[104]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[105]  T. Kroeger,et al.  An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands , 2007 .

[106]  Bernhard Streit,et al.  Legume cover crops as living mulches for winter wheat: Components of biomass and the control of weeds , 2007 .

[107]  J. Pickett,et al.  The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[108]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[109]  Scott M. Swinton,et al.  Evaluating Cover Crops for Benefits, Costs and Performance within Cropping System Niches , 2005 .

[110]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Regime Shifts, Resilience, and Biodiversity in Ecosystem Management , 2004 .

[111]  M. Antrop Why landscapes of the past are important for the future , 2005 .

[112]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[113]  西内 光 Agroecology , 1953, Ecological Studies.

[114]  M. Altieri Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture , 1989 .