Stimulating Thinking: Cultivating Better Decisions with Groupware Through Categorization

Previous research shows that groupware improves the exchange of information within groups. However, the additional information does not often lead to better group decisions, probably because individuals fail to process the new information they receive. This study explored the use of groupware processes that required individuals in groups to categorize information, in order to induce group members to better attend to the new information received from others and to integrate it into their own individual decision-making processes. Different groupware processes had different effects on attention to and integration of information, and ultimately on decision quality. Groupware processes that provided categories to organize information and groupware processes that required the receiver of information to categorize information increased attention to information and integration of information, which led to improved individual decision quality.

[1]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Kim B. Walker,et al.  The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change , 1987 .

[4]  J. Hackman,et al.  Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups , 1974 .

[5]  Thomas L. Saaty.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[6]  Robert J. House,et al.  Judgment calls in research , 1982 .

[7]  Ross Hightower,et al.  Effects of Communication Mode and Prediscussion Information Distribution Characteristics on Information Exchange in Groups , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[9]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Participant Satisfaction in Group Support Systems Research , 1996, ICIS.

[10]  A. Dennis.  Information Exchange and Use in Small Group Decision Making , 1996 .

[11]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research , 1991 .

[12]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Monica J. Garfield,et al.  The Creative Process: The Effects of Group Memory on Individual Idea Generation , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[15]  I. Benbasat,et al.  The Effects of Group, Task,Context, and Technology Variables on the Usefulness of Group Support Systems , 1993 .

[16]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[17]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information Exchange and Use in Group Decision Making: You Can Lead a Group to Information, but You Can't Make It Think , 1996, MIS Q..

[18]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[19]  Donald A. Waterman,et al.  Identifying the Relevant Aspects of a Problem Text , 1977, Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Charles Higgins Kepner,et al.  The Rational Manager: A Systematic Approach to Problem Solving and Decision-Making , 1965 .

[21]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[22]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Group Decision Support Systems and Group Communication , 1993 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[25]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[26]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[27]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Complexity, managers, and organizations , 1986 .

[28]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[29]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[30]  Kim Giffin,et al.  Decision-making group interaction , 1978 .

[31]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[32]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[33]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: effects of minority influence , 1997 .

[34]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[35]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[36]  L. Thompson.  Information exchange in negotiation , 1991 .

[37]  S. Harkins,et al.  Information Utility and the Multiple Source Effect , 1987 .

[38]  Joseph E. McGrath,et al.  Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas , 1981 .

[39]  W. Wood.  Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: Effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. , 1982 .

[40]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .