Receptive field focus of visual area V4 neurons determines responses to illusory surfaces

Significance Visual information is often fragmented, such as when objects block each other from view, and our brain must actively deduce missing parts of an image to perceive key features of the world. This study asks whether neurons in cortical area V4 can infer the presence of an object’s surface when visual clues are limited. Indeed, our experiments reveal that certain V4 neurons enhance their responses to an array of stimuli only when they are configured to give rise to an illusory surface. Intriguingly, this effect exhibited unexpected spatial precision relative to the inducing components of the illusion. These findings provide important clues about how the brain overcomes a fundamental challenge of vision. Illusory figures demonstrate the visual system’s ability to infer surfaces under conditions of fragmented sensory input. To investigate the role of midlevel visual area V4 in visual surface completion, we used multielectrode arrays to measure spiking responses to two types of visual stimuli: Kanizsa patterns that induce the perception of an illusory surface and physically similar control stimuli that do not. Neurons in V4 exhibited stronger and sometimes rhythmic spiking responses for the illusion-promoting configurations compared with controls. Moreover, this elevated response depended on the precise alignment of the neuron’s peak visual field sensitivity (receptive field focus) with the illusory surface itself. Neurons whose receptive field focus was over adjacent inducing elements, less than 1.5° away, did not show response enhancement to the illusion. Neither receptive field sizes nor fixational eye movements could account for this effect, which was present in both single-unit signals and multiunit activity. These results suggest that the active perceptual completion of surfaces and shapes, which is a fundamental problem in natural visual experience, draws upon the selective enhancement of activity within a distinct subpopulation of neurons in cortical area V4.

[1]  Rüdiger von der Heydt,et al.  The speed of context integration in the visual cortex. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cue-dependent deficits in grating orientation discrimination after V4 lesions in macaques , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  Nava Rubin,et al.  Perceptual Completion across the Vertical Meridian and the Role of Early Visual Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[4]  C. Strecha,et al.  Surface construction by a 2-D differentiation-integration process: a neurocomputational model for perceived border ownership, depth, and lightness in Kanizsa figures. , 2010, Psychological review.

[5]  H. A. Pham,et al.  Perceptual deficits after lesions of inferotemporal cortex in macaques. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial receptive field organization of macaque V4 neurons. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  A neural model of figure-ground organization. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Defining the Units of Competition: Influences of Perceptual Organization on Competitive Interactions in Human Visual Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Gregor M. Hörzer,et al.  Theta coupling between V4 and prefrontal cortex predicts visual short-term memory performance , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual modulation of single neurons in primate visual cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Nieder,et al.  Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  P Kaposvári,et al.  The representation of Kanizsa illusory contours in the monkey inferior temporal cortex , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Alan N. Gove,et al.  Brightness perception, illusory contours, and corticogeniculate feedback , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[15]  Matthew Fellows,et al.  On the variability of manual spike sorting , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  C. Hung,et al.  Real and illusory contour processing in area V1 of the primate: a cortical balancing act. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  High-Frequency, Long-Range Coupling Between Prefrontal and Visual Cortex During Attention , 2009, Science.

[19]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  FigureGround Segregation in a Recurrent Network Architecture , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1) , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  H. Neumann,et al.  The Role of Attention in Figure-Ground Segregation in Areas V1 and V4 of the Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[22]  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation to illusory contours in human visual cortex. , 2010, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  T. S. Lee,et al.  Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Analysis of the Context Integration Mechanisms Underlying Figure–Ground Organization in the Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Kechen Zhang,et al.  A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4 , 2011, Current Biology.

[26]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Altered figure-ground perception in monkeys with an extra-striate lesion , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Finding out about filling-in: a guide to perceptual completion for visual science and the philosophy of perception. , 1998, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[28]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Visual Area V4 , 2012, Neuron.

[29]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[30]  Michael J. Hawken,et al.  Macaque VI neurons can signal ‘illusory’ contours , 1993, Nature.

[31]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[32]  C. Olson,et al.  Low-frequency oscillations arising from competitive interactions between visual stimuli in macaque inferotemporal cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Victor A. F. Lamme The neurophysiology of figure-ground segregation in primary visual cortex , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  P. Roelfsema Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  Gregory W. Lesher,et al.  Illusory contours: Toward a neurally based perceptual theory , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[38]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Enhanced Perception of Illusory Contours in the Lower Versus Upper Visual Hemifields , 1996, Science.

[39]  M. Seghier,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Findings on the Human Perception of Illusory Contours , 2022 .

[40]  Wei Wang,et al.  Equivalent Representation of Real and Illusory Contours in Macaque V4 , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  fMRI Reveals a Common Neural Substrate of Illusory and Real Contours in V1 after Perceptual Learning , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  L. Kiorpes,et al.  Global visual processing in macaques studied using Kanizsa illusory shapes , 2010, Visual Neuroscience.

[43]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of illusory contours , 1994, Vision Research.

[44]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Selectivity and Tolerance (“Invariance”) Both Increase as Visual Information Propagates from Cortical Area V4 to IT , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  M. Sur,et al.  Orientation Maps of Subjective Contours in Visual Cortex , 1996, Science.

[46]  Anirvan S. Nandy,et al.  The Fine Structure of Shape Tuning in Area V4 , 2013, Neuron.

[47]  Y Kamitani,et al.  Afterimage of Perceptually Filled-in Surface , 2001, Science.