Evaluation of a surfactant mixture C31G as a teat dip by a modified excised teat model.

A mixture of amphoteric surfactants with antimicrobial properties, C31G, was evaluated as a teat dip by a modified excised teat model. The model was modified to avoid misinterpretation of results from indigenous bacterial microflora on teats. In three experiments, bacterial numbers recovered from teats dipped in .75, 1.5, and 3.0% solutions of C31G were compared with bacteria recovered from undipped teats (negative controls) and teats dipped with 1.0% iodophor (an effective teat dip). Mean log reductions of teat end concentrations of Staphylococcus, aureus, Streptococcus fecalis, and Escherichia coli were determined in each experiment. Efficacy was greatest for the 3.0% solution of C31G with mean log reductions (Log reduction = Log 10 of controls - Log 10 of dipped teats) 3.53 for Staphylococcus aureus, 2.89 for Streptococcus fecalis, and 3.16 for Escherichia coli. Iodophor (1%) yielded mean log reductions of 3.26 for Staphylococcus aureus, 2.16 for Streptococcus fecalis, and 2.83 for Escherichia coli. For all three organisms, number of viable organisms decreased with increasing concentrations of C31G. The efficacy of C31G should be evaluated in vivo.

[1]  Kenyon Aj,et al.  Effect of C31G, an antimicrobial surfactant, on healing of incised guinea pig wounds. , 1983 .

[2]  D. Stieritz,et al.  A burned mouse model to evaluate anti-Pseudomonas activity of topical agents. , 1982, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[3]  P. A. Hall,et al.  Modified excised teat model for laboratory screening of teat dips. , 1981, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  R. Farnsworth Role of teat dips in mastitis control. , 1980, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[5]  Hemken Rw Milk and meat iodine content: relation to human health. , 1980 .

[6]  J. W. Pankey,et al.  Hygiene in the prevention of udder infections. IV. Evaluation of teat dips with excised cows' teats. , 1978, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  W. Philpot,et al.  Hygiene in the prevention of udder infections. V. Efficacy of teat dips under experimental exposure to mastitis pathogens. , 1978, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Johnson,et al.  Screening tests for new teat dips. , 1976, Journal of Dairy Science.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Casman,et al.  Efficacy of a Commercial Iodine-In-Oil Teat Dip , 1975 .

[10]  J. W. Pankey,et al.  Hygiene in the prevention of udder infections. III. Effectiveness of 59 teat dips for reducing bacterial populations on teat skin. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  J. W. Pankey,et al.  Hygiene in the prevention of udder infections. II. Evaluation of oil-based teat dips. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R J Eberhart,et al.  Evaluation of a hygiene and dry period therapy program for mastitis control. , 1972, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Effectiveness of postmilking teat dips. , 1972, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  R. Edlich,et al.  Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. V. An assessment of the effectiveness of pHisoHex and Betadine surgical scrub solutions. , 1971, American journal of surgery.

[15]  R. Edlich,et al.  Studies in management of the contaminated wound: III. Assessment of the effectiveness of irrigation with antiseptic agents , 1971 .

[16]  L. Schultz,et al.  Effectiveness of a post-milking teat dip in preventing new udder infections. , 1970, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  Mcdonald Js Prevention of intramammary infection in dairy cattle during lactation: role of teat skin disinfection and milking unit sanitation. , 1968 .