Finite element analysis of the effects of three preparation techniques on stresses within roots having curved canals.

AIM To compare stress distribution within roots having curved canals prepared by three preparation techniques when subjected to occlusal loads and condensation loads as a consequence of different filling techniques. METHODOLOGY Three preparation techniques (crown-down, step-back and reverse-flaring) were compared by finite element analysis (FEA). Based on an established FEA model within curved canal, three modified models prepared by different preparation techniques were established by replacing original canal with prepared ones. FEA was performed to investigate the stress distribution under occlusal forces, which were simulated by loads of 500 N in four directions (buccal, lingual, mesial and distal), at 0 (vertical), 30, 45 and 60 degrees to the longitudinal axis of the tooth. In addition, vertical and lateral condensation processes at the curvature were simulated to determine the influence of different canal filling techniques on stress distribution. RESULTS When the occlusal and the filling loads were applied, stress distribution around the curvature and the orifice had little change on the three modified prepared models. The reverse-flaring technique resulted in the least stress with the lateral condensation process. In the case of vertical condensation, the maximum von Mises stress (46.205 MPa) occurred near the loading site. The model also revealed a tendency for stress concentration (30.635 MPa) just below the compacting level. CONCLUSIONS The study confirms that appropriate canal preparation techniques in simulated curved canals have little influence on stress distribution around the curvature or the orifice. However, vertical compaction induced high stress in the region just below the loading site.

[1]  O A Peters,et al.  Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro-computed tomography. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[2]  J. Palamara,et al.  Patterns of vertical root fracture: factors affecting stress distribution in the root canal. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Tensile Properties of Mineralized and Demineralized Human and Bovine Dentin , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[4]  J. Palamara,et al.  A comparison of the effects of two canal preparation techniques on root fracture susceptibility and fracture pattern. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  O. Peters,et al.  ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. , 2003, International endodontic journal.

[6]  R M Love,et al.  A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[7]  J. Palamara,et al.  Effect of root canal size and external root surface morphology on fracture susceptibility and pattern: a finite element analysis. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  Zhan Liu,et al.  Development of a finite element analysis model with curved canal and stress analysis. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  J. Palamara,et al.  Finite element analysis and strain-gauge studies of vertical root fracture. , 2003, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  A Versluis,et al.  Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[11]  A Versluis,et al.  How does canal taper affect root stresses? , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[12]  J. Palamara,et al.  Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  P. Gülkan,et al.  Endodontics: Additional studies on the distribution of stresses during vertical compaction of gutta-percha in the root canal , 1999, British Dental Journal.

[14]  P. Gulkan,et al.  Stress analysis during root canal filling by vertical and lateral condensation procedures: a three-dimensional finite element model of a maxillary canine tooth , 1998, British Dental Journal.