A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure.

Abstract Despite the critical ecological roles of structural complexity, ecologically relevant quantitative measures of structural complexity that allow comparisons among forest stands are still lacking. The objective of this study was to develop a method that allows comparisons of structural heterogeneity among stands. To encompass a broad range of potential structural complexities, we simulated three spatial point patterns each for tree-size distributions from five inventoried natural stands. Forest structure was modeled and analyzed by simulating point patterns of trees and constructing triangular networks to connect neighboring tree tops to one another. This method is based on the concept of spatial tessellation of tree positions, where point patterns are converted into 2-dimensional nearest neighbor triangles. A structural complexity index (SCI) was defined as the sum of the areas of 3-dimensional triangles (with x , y , and z coordinates) divided by the sum of the areas of 2-dimensional triangles. Vertical gradients were defined as the maximum size difference among the trees forming a triangle, that is, the greater the difference, the greater the structure and the larger the SCI value. Patch-types were defined as classes of structural gradients at different positions within the canopy. More patch-types are also indicative of more structurally heterogeneous stands. Both the SCI and the number of patch-types and patch-size heterogeneity related closely to conventional descriptors of forest structure. While the number of patch-types and patch-type heterogeneity related more to the vertical component of structural complexity, SCI integrated well with both the vertical and horizontal structure. SCI and the concept of patch-types complement one another and can be used to quantitatively compare the structure of different stands. The applicability of this modeling approach in characterizing the structural heterogeneity of forests across spatial scales is discussed.

[1]  E. W. Jones.  THE STRUCTURE AND REPRODUCTION OE THE VIRGIN EOREST OE THE NORTH TEMPERATE ZONE , 1945 .

[2]  Andrew B. Carey,et al.  Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged Douglas-Fir forests , 1991 .

[3]  S. Acker,et al.  Asymptotic height-diameter equations for twenty-four tree species in western Oregon , 1995 .

[4]  P. Zedler,et al.  Structural gradient analysis of upland forests in the western Great Lakes area , 1968 .

[5]  T. Spies,et al.  Growing‐Season Microclimatic Gradients from Clearcut Edges into Old‐Growth Douglas‐Fir Forests , 1995 .

[6]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[7]  H. Arthur Meyer,et al.  Structure, Growth, and Drain in Balanced Uneven-Aged Forests , 1952 .

[8]  J. Franklin,et al.  Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. , 1981 .

[9]  L. C. Kuiper,et al.  The structure of natural Douglas-fir forests in Western Washington and Western Oregon. , 1988 .

[10]  T. Spies,et al.  Douglas-Fir Forests: Managing for Timber and Mature-Forest Habitat , 1993, Journal of Forestry.

[11]  Antti Penttinen,et al.  Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: An example from boreal spruce forest in southern Finland , 1996 .

[12]  T. W. Daniel,et al.  The Practice of Silviculture , 1936 .

[13]  N. B. Kotliar,et al.  Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity , 1990 .

[14]  R. Whittaker.  Forest Dimensions and Production in the Great Smoky Mountains , 1966 .

[15]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[16]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony , 1997 .

[17]  中村 賢太郎.  ○The Practice of Silviculture., HAWLEY, R.C.&SMITH, D.M., 6th edition, 1954,(525 ページ), New York, J. WILEY & Sons., 定価7.5ドル, (約3,000円) , 1955 .

[18]  D. W. Smith,et al.  Vegetative Structure of an Appalachian Oak Forest in Southwestern Virginia , 1980 .

[19]  F. Smith,et al.  Volume increment in Pinus contorta var. latifolia: the influence of stand development and crown dynamics , 1992 .

[20]  J. Wiens.  Population Responses to Patchy Environments , 1976 .

[21]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[22]  Joseph Buongiorno,et al.  Tree Size Diversity and Economic Returns in Uneven-Aged Forest Stands , 1994 .

[23]  Prof. Dr. Francis Hallé,et al.  Tropical Trees and Forests , 1978, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[24]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Gap Characteristics and Vegetation Response in Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1989 .

[25]  Melinda Moeur,et al.  Characterizing Spatial Patterns of Trees Using Stem-Mapped Data , 1993, Forest Science.