Activation of New Attentional Templates for Real-world Objects in Visual Search

Visual search is controlled by representations of target objects (attentional templates). Such templates are often activated in response to verbal descriptions of search targets, but it is unclear whether search can be guided effectively by such verbal cues. We measured ERPs to track the activation of attentional templates for new target objects defined by word cues. On each trial run, a word cue was followed by three search displays that contained the cued target object among three distractors. Targets were detected more slowly in the first display of each trial run, and the N2pc component (an ERP marker of attentional target selection) was attenuated and delayed for the first relative to the two successive presentations of a particular target object, demonstrating limitations in the ability of word cues to activate effective attentional templates. N2pc components to target objects in the first display were strongly affected by differences in object imageability (i.e., the ability of word cues to activate a target-matching visual representation). These differences were no longer present for the second presentation of the same target objects, indicating that a single perceptual encounter is sufficient to activate a precise attentional template. Our results demonstrate the superiority of visual over verbal target specifications in the control of visual search, highlight the fact that verbal descriptions are more effective for some objects than others, and suggest that the attentional templates that guide search for particular real-world target objects are analog visual representations.

[1]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[3]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  Perception of objects in natural scenes: is it really attention free? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Naomi M. Kenner,et al.  How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[7]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  The costs of switching attentional sets , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Z. Pylyshyn Mental imagery: In search of a theory , 2002, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[9]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[10]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  Searching for Something Familiar or Novel: Top–Down Attentional Selection of Specific Items or Object Categories , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Automatic capture of attention by conceptually generated working memory templates , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[16]  S. Yantis The Neural Basis of Selective Attention , 2008, Current directions in psychological science.

[17]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[19]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[20]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[21]  Gregory J Zelinsky,et al.  Effects of target typicality on categorical search. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[22]  M. Brodeur,et al.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a New Set of 480 Normative Photos of Objects to Be Used as Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Research , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[26]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[28]  J. Henderson,et al.  The influence of color on the perception of scene gist. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[31]  Martin Eimer,et al.  The gradual emergence of spatially selective target processing in visual search: From feature-specific to object-based attentional control. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery? , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  G. Zelinsky,et al.  Short article: Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.