The elastic and inelastic seismic response of plan-asymmetric regular multi-storey steel-frame buildings has been investigated under bi-directional horizontal ground motions. Symmetric variants of these buildings were designed according to Eurocodes 3 and 8. Asymmetric buildings were created by assuming a mass eccentricity in each of the two principal directions. The torsional response in the elastic and inelastic range is qualitatively similar with the exception of the stiff edge in the strong direction of torsionally stiff buildings and the stiff edge in the weak direction of torsionally flexible buildings. The response is influenced by the intensity of ground motion, i.e. by the magnitude of plastic deformation. In the limiting case of very strong ground motion, the behaviour of initially torsionally stiff and initially torsionally flexible buildings may become qualitatively similar. A decrease in stiffness due to plastic deformations in one direction may substantially influence the behaviour in the orthogonal direction. The response strongly depends on the detailed characteristics of the ground motion. On average, torsional effects are reduced with increasing plastic deformations, unless the plastic deformations are small. Taking into account also the dispersion of results which is generally larger in the inelastic range than in the elastic one, it can be concluded that (a) the amplification of displacements determined by the elastic analysis can be used as a rough estimate also in the inelastic range and (b) any favourable torsional effect on the stiff side of torsionally stiff buildings, which may arise from elastic analysis, may disappear in the inelastic range. The conclusions are limited to fairly regular buildings and subject to further investigations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
[1]
Anil K. Chopra,et al.
Understanding the inelastic seismic behaviour of asymmetric-plan buildings
,
1995
.
[2]
Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.
Inelastic Behavior of Asymmetric Multistory Buildings
,
1996
.
[3]
Peter Fajfar,et al.
A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design
,
2000
.
[4]
Peter Fajfar,et al.
Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement
,
1994
.
[5]
D. Muir Wood,et al.
Fourth Forum on Implications of recent earthquakes on seismic risk, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Technical report TIT/EERG 02-1
,
2002
.
[6]
Tom Paulay.
Understanding torsional phenomena in ductile systems
,
2000
.
[7]
Jaime De-la-Colina,et al.
Assessment of Design Recommendations for Torsionally Unbalanced Multistory Buildings
,
2003
.
[8]
E. Gaylord,et al.
Design of Steel Structures
,
1972
.