Dual Energy Method for Breast Imaging: A Simulation Study

Dual energy methods can suppress the contrast between adipose and glandular tissues in the breast and therefore enhance the visibility of calcifications. In this study, a dual energy method based on analytical modeling was developed for the detection of minimum microcalcification thickness. To this aim, a modified radiographic X-ray unit was considered, in order to overcome the limited kVp range of mammographic units used in previous DE studies, combined with a high resolution CMOS sensor (pixel size of 22.5 μm) for improved resolution. Various filter materials were examined based on their K-absorption edge. Hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to simulate microcalcifications. The contrast to noise ratio (CNRtc) of the subtracted images was calculated for both monoenergetic and polyenergetic X-ray beams. The optimum monoenergetic pair was 23/58 keV for the low and high energy, respectively, resulting in a minimum detectable microcalcification thickness of 100 μm. In the polyenergetic X-ray study, the optimal spectral combination was 40/70 kVp filtered with 100 μm cadmium and 1000 μm copper, respectively. In this case, the minimum detectable microcalcification thickness was 150 μm. The proposed dual energy method provides improved microcalcification detectability in breast imaging with mean glandular dose values within acceptable levels.

[1]  N. Dubrawsky.  Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  E. S. de Paredes,et al.  Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  J. Harvey,et al.  Breast cancer—facts and figures , 2013 .

[4]  J. Boone,et al.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment. , 1999, Radiology.

[5]  J. Youk,et al.  Performance of hand-held whole-breast ultrasound based on BI-RADS in women with mammographically negative dense breast , 2011, European Radiology.

[6]  Xi Chen,et al.  Indicator and Calibration Material for Microcalcifications in Dual-Energy Mammography , 2008, ICMB.

[7]  Isa Yildirim,et al.  An Object-Oriented Simulator for 3D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Imaging System , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[8]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[9]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. K. Gong,et al.  The density of organic and volatile and non‐volatile inorganic components of bone , 1964, The Anatomical record.

[12]  P. Pani,et al.  GEMS: Underwater spectrometer for long-term radioactivity measurements , 2011 .

[13]  D J Crotty,et al.  Experimental spectral measurements of heavy K-edge filtered beams for x-ray computed mammotomography. , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Constantinos G. Loukas,et al.  Breast Cancer Characterization Based on Image Classification of Tissue Sections Visualized under Low Magnification , 2013, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[15]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2012 , 2012, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  Chris C Shaw,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections. , 2005, Medical physics.

[18]  Robert D. Speller,et al.  The Dexela 2923 CMOS X-ray detector: A flat panel detector based on CMOS active pixel sensors for medical imaging applications , 2012 .

[19]  Aydin Akan,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection with Reduced Feature Set , 2015, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[20]  D. Blanc,et al.  European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .

[21]  Xinming Liu,et al.  A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  R Turchetta,et al.  Empirical electro-optical and x-ray performance evaluation of CMOS active pixels sensor for low dose, high resolution x-ray medical imaging. , 2007, Medical physics.

[23]  R Speller,et al.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  I. Kandarakis,et al.  Pencil Beam Spectral Measurements of Ce, Ho, Yb, and Ba Powders for Potential Use in Medical Applications , 2015 .

[26]  Francesco Fauci,et al.  X-ray spectroscopy and dosimetry with a portable CdTe device , 2007 .

[27]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[28]  I. Kandarakis,et al.  Light emission efficiency and imaging performance of Gd2O2S: Eu powder scintillator under x-ray radiography conditions. , 2010, Medical physics.

[29]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[30]  I. Kandarakis,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Evaluation of a High Resolution CMOS Based Detector Under X-Ray Imaging Conditions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[31]  Nooshin Kiarashi,et al.  Estimating breast density with dual energy mammography: a simple model based on calibration phantoms , 2013, Medical Imaging.