Uncertainty quantification in data-driven stochastic subspace identification

Abstract A crucial aspect in system identification is the assessment of the accuracy of the identified system matrices. Stochastic Subspace Identification (SSI) is a widely used approach for the identification of linear systems from output-only data because it combines a high computational robustness and efficiency with a high estimation accuracy. Practical approaches for estimating the (co)variance of system matrices that are identified using SSI exist for the case where the system matrices are obtained from the shift-invariant structure of the extended observability matrix. However, in data-driven SSI, the system matrices are often obtained in a different way, using identified state sequences. This case is treated in the present work, for three common types of weighting. First, it is shown that the estimated system matrices depend entirely on sample output correlation estimates, the covariance of which can be straightforwardly estimated. Subsequently, a linear sensitivity analysis of the data-driven SSI algorithm is performed, such that the covariance of the identified system matrices can be also computed. A memory efficient implementation is obtained by computing the related Jacobian only implicitly. An extensive numerical validation, covering a range of parameter choices, demonstrates the accuracy of the estimated variance of the identified system description. Finally, the practical use of the method in the context of operational modal analysis is demonstrated in an experimental case study.

[1]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[2]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Explaining operational modal analysis with data from an arch bridge , 2011 .

[3]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Comparing the CCA Subspace Method to Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Methods in the case of No Exogenous Inputs , 2005 .

[4]  A. Chiuso,et al.  The asymptotic variance of subspace estimates , 2004 .

[5]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Analysis of the asymptotic properties of the MOESP type of subspace algorithms , 2000, Autom..

[6]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  System Identification Methods for (Operational) Modal Analysis: Review and Comparison , 2012 .

[7]  Bart De Moor,et al.  A note on persistency of excitation , 2005, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[8]  B. Moor,et al.  Subspace identification for linear systems , 1996 .

[9]  B. Peeters,et al.  Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: A Review , 2001 .

[10]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification , 2014 .

[11]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in operational modal analysis with stochastic subspace identification: Validation and applications , 2016 .

[12]  Lucie Vandewalle,et al.  Damage identification using modal strains identified from operational fiber-optic Bragg grating data , 2018 .

[13]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Uncertainty bounds on modal parameters obtained from stochastic subspace identification , 2008 .

[14]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Efficient Multi-Order Uncertainty Computation for Stochastic Subspace Identification , 2013 .

[15]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  REFERENCE-BASED STOCHASTIC SUBSPACE IDENTIFICATION FOR OUTPUT-ONLY MODAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[16]  E. Reynders,et al.  Influence of damage versus temperature on modal strains and neutral axis positions of beam-like structures , 2019 .

[17]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[18]  E. Jaynes Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[19]  Dietmar Bauer,et al.  Consistency and asymptotic normality of some subspace algorithms for systems without observed inputs , 1999, Autom..

[20]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Some facts about the choice of the weighting matrices in Larimore type of subspace algorithms , 2002, Autom..

[21]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Variance estimation of modal parameters from output-only and input/output subspace-based system identification , 2016 .

[22]  Tohru Katayama,et al.  Subspace Methods for System Identification , 2005 .

[23]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Reference-based combined deterministic–stochastic subspace identification for experimental and operational modal analysis , 2006 .