Randomized controlled trial of proactive web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention for university students.

BACKGROUND University students drink more heavily than their nonstudent peers and are often unaware that their drinking is risky and exceeds normative levels. We tested the efficacy of a proactive Web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention program. METHODS A randomized controlled trial was conducted at an Australian university in 2007. Invitations were sent to 13 000 undergraduates (age range, 17-24 years) to complete a Web-based Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Of 7237 students who responded, 2435 scored in the hazardous/harmful range (> or =8) and were randomized, and 2050 (84%) completed at least 1 follow-up assessment. Intervention was 10 minutes of Web-based motivational assessment and personalized feedback. Controls received only screening. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1 and 6 months with observers and participants blinded to allocation. Outcome measures were drinking frequency, typical occasion quantity, overall volume, number of personal problems, an academic problems score, prevalence of binge drinking, and prevalence of heavy drinking. RESULTS Mean (SD) baseline Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores for control and intervention groups were 14.3 (5.1) and 14.2 (5.1), respectively. After 1 month, participants receiving intervention drank less often (rate ratio [RR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94), smaller quantities per occasion (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98), and less alcohol overall (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.78-0.90) than did controls. Differences in alcohol-related harms were nonsignificant. At 6 months, intervention effects persisted for drinking frequency (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97) and overall volume (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.96) but not for other variables. CONCLUSION Proactive Web-based screening and intervention reduces drinking in undergraduates, and such a program could be implemented widely.

[1]  Harold D. Holder,et al.  Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity: Research and Public Policy , 2010 .

[2]  F. Brooks The health of children and young people , 2010 .

[3]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Curbing problem drinking with personalized-feedback interventions: a meta-analysis. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  J. Langley,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[5]  T. Chikritzhs,et al.  Ingredient and nutrition information labelling of alcoholic beverages: do consumers want it? , 2007, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  M. Larimer,et al.  Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individual-focused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. , 2007, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  E. Karam,et al.  Alcohol use among college students: an international perspective , 2007, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[8]  N. Heather,et al.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  Kathleen M. Lenk,et al.  Environmental policies to reduce college drinking: an update of research findings. , 2007, Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs.

[10]  N. Horton,et al.  A cautionary note regarding count models of alcohol consumption in randomized controlled trials , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.

[11]  T. Palfai,et al.  Screening and brief intervention online for college students: the ihealth study. , 2006, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[12]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Episode-centred analysis of drinking to intoxication in university students. , 2005, Alcohol and alcoholism.

[13]  Scott T Walters,et al.  Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? , 2005, Addictive behaviors.

[14]  D. Kavanagh,et al.  Innovative approaches to intervention for problem drinking , 2005, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[15]  K. Kypri,et al.  Do university students drink more hazardously than their non-student peers? , 2005, Addiction.

[16]  Patrick Royston,et al.  MICE for multiple imputation of missing values , 2005 .

[17]  W. Slutske,et al.  Alcohol use disorders among US college students and their non-college-attending peers. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[18]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Addiction.

[19]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  An internet-based survey method for college student drinking research. , 2004, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[20]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Alcohol‐related problems experienced by university students in New Zealand , 2004, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[21]  J. Ware,et al.  Applied Longitudinal Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  B. Grant,et al.  Another look at heavy episodic drinking and alcohol use disorders among college and noncollege youth. , 2004, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[23]  Kypros Kypri,et al.  Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[24]  M. Larimer,et al.  Approaches to brief intervention for hazardous drinking in young people. , 2004, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[25]  J. Langley,et al.  Secondhand effects of alcohol use among university students: computerised survey , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  H. Boshuizen,et al.  Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[28]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. , 1989 .

[30]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[31]  K. Kypri,et al.  Development of a Web-based alcohol intervention for university students: processes and challenges. , 2009, Drug and alcohol review.

[32]  J. Langley,et al.  Assessment may conceal therapeutic benefit: findings from a randomized controlled trial for hazardous drinking. , 2007, Addiction.

[33]  A. Mokdad,et al.  Binge drinking among US adults. , 2003, JAMA.

[34]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Talk is cheap: measuring drinking outcomes in clinical trials. , 2000, Journal of studies on alcohol.