Knowledge visualisation for construction procurement decision-making: a process innovation

PurposeIn the construction sector, the knowledge-based process outgrows its emphasis on technological aspects. Yet, there is a lack of applied studies showing how a procurement system (PS) could be selected in the digital age. In particular, there is a radical need to establish an innovative process to visualise novel PS decision. Therefore, this paper aims to present a knowledge visualised framework for aiding construction PS decision-making.Design/methodology/approachThis paper describes the construction of process innovation. The framework (process) is supported by four influential decision supporting methods (mean utility values, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy set theory and Delphi method) and computer programming (Matlab).FindingsThere are four stages of this framework: (1) uniform rating for decision alternatives; (2) group decision for determining the decision attribute; (3) determining the final choice; (4) reporting the cognitive computing process. Supported by individual and groups decision dynamics, this framework emphasises how the dashboard aided innovative approach enables the induction of understanding, cognitive computing for decision-making and how the information would precisely be represented, which are vital requirements of modern construction.Originality/valueThe contribution of this paper presents two leverage points that support the modern PS decision. Firstly, this paper provides a holistic view of the decision supporting methods on the basis of how a suitable PS would be systematically sought. Based on the existing studies, this paper upgrades into a visualised knowledge decision supporting process. It helps the participants understand and improve their cognitive learning. Secondly, this framework allows the participants to have a view of the individual and group decisions. It sheds light on the development of the collaborative decision-making process.

[1]  Yan Wang,et al.  Trust modeling based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and the MULTIMOORA method , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Mark Konchar,et al.  Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems , 1998 .

[3]  Jun Long,et al.  A Recommendation Model Based on Multi-Emotion Similarity in the Social Networks , 2019, Inf..

[4]  M. Yusof,et al.  Effect of knowledge management on growth performance in construction industry , 2016 .

[5]  Marcus Jefferies,et al.  A strategy for evaluating a fuzzy case-based construction procurement selection system , 2006, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[6]  H. Alves,et al.  Linking municipal Best Value and market performance: the Portuguese experience , 2020, Public Money & Management.

[7]  Martin J. Eppler What is an Effective Knowledge Visualization? Insights from a Review of Seminal Concepts , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[8]  M. C. Georgiadou,et al.  An overview of benefits and challenges of building information modelling (BIM) adoption in UK residential projects , 2019, Construction Innovation.

[9]  Shah Jahan Miah,et al.  A Big Data Analytics Method for Tourist Behaviour Analysis , 2017, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  Application of Delphi method in selection of procurement systems for construction projects , 2001 .

[11]  Jee-Hyong Lee,et al.  Visualization of knowledge map for monitoring knowledge diagnoses , 2019, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[12]  Keng-Boon Ooi,et al.  Can competitive advantage be achieved through knowledge management? A case study on SMEs , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Shamil Naoum,et al.  Modern selection criteria for procurement methods in construction , 2016 .

[14]  H. Voordijk,et al.  The reasoning behind infrastructure manager’s choice of procurement instruments , 2019, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management.

[15]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  System information modelling in practice: Analysis of tender documentation quality in a mining mega-project , 2017 .

[16]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Project delivery system selection of construction projects in China , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Paul R. Havig,et al.  A human cognition framework for information visualization , 2014, Comput. Graph..

[18]  Ali Mostafavi,et al.  Selecting Appropriate Project Delivery System: Fuzzy Approach with Risk Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Ranjit Bose,et al.  Knowledge management-enabled health care management systems: capabilities, infrastructure, and decision-support , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[20]  Alexander Auer,et al.  Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation Practices in SMEs: Insights into Drivers and Barriers from the Austrian Medical Device Sector , 2017 .

[21]  Yusuf Tansel İç,et al.  A knowledge-based material selection system for interactive pressure vessel design , 2020 .

[22]  Daniela Carlucci,et al.  Applying a systems thinking framework to assess knowledge assets dynamics for business performance improvement , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  Paul Matthyssens,et al.  Reconceptualizing value innovation for Industry 4.0 and the Industrial Internet of Things , 2019, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[24]  Dominik Slezak,et al.  Project Delivery System Selection under Uncertainty: Multicriteria Multilevel Decision Aid Model , 2007 .

[25]  Yusuf Tansel İç,et al.  A decision support system for selection of net-shape primary manufacturing processes , 2014 .

[26]  William Swan,et al.  Building trust in construction projects , 2007 .

[27]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management , 2020 .

[28]  Isabel Ramos,et al.  The Delphi Method in Information Systems Research (2004‑2017) , 2019, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods.

[29]  Alva Erwin,et al.  Review of computer vision application in in vitro fertilization: the application of deep learning-based computer vision technology in the world of IVF , 2021, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[30]  Nan Zhao,et al.  Method selection: a conceptual framework for public sector PPP selection , 2018, Built Environment Project and Asset Management.

[31]  A. Heutink,et al.  Assessing usefulness of 4D BIM tools in risk mitigation strategies , 2019, Automation in Construction.

[32]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visualization in management: From communication to collaboration. A response to Zhang , 2013, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[33]  Tatiana Gavrilova,et al.  Knowledge visualization: Critique of the St. Gallen School and an analysis of contemporary trends , 2017 .

[34]  P. Love,et al.  Procurement of construction facilities in Guangdong Province, China: factors influencing the choice of procurement method , 2004 .

[35]  Pardis Pishdad-Bozorgi,et al.  Identifying and Prioritizing Best Practices to Achieve Flash Track Projects , 2016 .

[37]  Qiping Shen,et al.  Which Owner Characteristics Are Key Factors Affecting Project Delivery System Decision Making? Empirical Analysis Based on the Rough Set Theory , 2015 .

[38]  Steve Rowlinson,et al.  Building information modelling, integrated project delivery and all that , 2017 .

[39]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Selecting a suitable procurement method for a building project , 1998 .

[40]  Qing Xia,et al.  An Interval Pythagorean Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Method Based on Similarity Measures and Connection Numbers , 2019, Inf..

[41]  Willem van Winden,et al.  Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges , 2019, Research Policy.

[42]  Nabeel Khwaja,et al.  Innovations in Project Delivery Method Selection Approach in the Texas Department of Transportation , 2018 .