Experimental investigations on monotonic and cyclic behavior of steel pallet rack connections

Abstract Application of steel pallet racks (SPRs) for storage purposes has been widely grown around the world since the age of the industrial revolution. SPRs are cold formed structures and beam-to-column connections (BCCs) used in these structures are largely responsible for the sway stability of these frames in the down-aisle direction. It is essential to understand the performance of SPR BCCs under variable circumstances. This study investigates the monotonic and cyclic behavior of SPR BCCs. The cantilever test method was used and six monotonic and six cyclic tests were conducted according to the European standard and major failure modes and moment-rotation (M-θ) behavior of the connections were identified. In order to appraise the influence of parameters, the connections were distinguished by column thickness. After investigating the original rotational stiffness value, moment resistance, ductility and failure mode of the connection, an innovative design of SPR BCC is proposed with one additional bolt in the beam end connector and monotonic testing was performed. The findings showed that the proposed connections increased the performance of SPR BCC to a larger extent.

[1]  Ali Kheyroddin,et al.  Numerical comparison of the seismic performance of steel rings in off-centre bracing system and diagonal bracing system , 2015 .

[2]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Evaluation of connection flexibility in cold formed steel racks , 2010 .

[3]  R. G. Beale,et al.  Experimental analysis of semi-rigid boltless connectors , 1997 .

[4]  Yiyi Chen,et al.  Flexural behavior of steel storage rack beam-to-upright connections , 2014 .

[5]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  Behavior of Industrial Steel Rack Connections , 2016 .

[6]  Kamal M. Bajoria,et al.  Determination of flexibility of beam-to-column connectors used in thin walled cold-formed steel pallet racking systems , 2006 .

[7]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental Stiffness and Seismic Response of Pallet-Type Steel Storage Rack Connectors , 2006 .

[8]  Carlo Andrea Castiglioni,et al.  Experimental analysis on the cyclic behaviour of beam-to-column joints in steel storage pallet racks , 2001 .

[9]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Experimental Investigation on the Seismic Behavior of Palletized Merchandise in Steel Storage Racks , 2010 .

[10]  Mahdi Shariati,et al.  Steel Rack Connections: Identification of Most Influential Factors and a Comparison of Stiffness Design Methods , 2015, PloS one.

[11]  Hasanuddin Lamit,et al.  Correlation Study on User Satisfaction from Adaptive Behavior and Energy Consumption in Office Buildings , 2014 .

[12]  J. Bonada,et al.  Determination of beam‐to‐column connection characteristics in pallet rack structures: a comparison of the EN and ANSI methods and an analysis of the influence of the moment‐to‐shear ratios , 2013 .

[13]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Performance-Based Seismic Design of Pallet-Type Steel Storage Racks , 2006 .

[14]  R. G. Beale,et al.  Numerical modelling of semi-rigid boltless connectors , 2001 .

[15]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  Behavior of steel pallet rack beam-to-column connections at elevated temperatures , 2016 .

[16]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Experimental stiffness of pallet-type steel storage rack tier drop connectors , 2007 .

[17]  Kim J.R. Rasmussen,et al.  Bolted moment connections in drive-in and drive-through steel storage racks , 2010 .

[18]  Ali Kheyroddin,et al.  Evaluating the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with circular element in optimum place , 2014 .

[19]  Mohd Zamin Jumaat,et al.  State-of-the-art review on the design and performance of steel pallet rack connections , 2016 .

[20]  Danial Jahed Armaghani,et al.  Bearing capacity of precast thin-walled foundation in sand , 2015 .