The Implications of the Results of Computerized Perimetry in Normals for the Statistical Evaluation of Glaucomatous Visual Fields
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Johnson,et al. Mass visual field screening in a driving population. , 1980, Ophthalmology.
[2] F. Hollows,et al. Intra-ocular pressure, glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects in a defined population. , 1966, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[3] J Katz,et al. Asymmetry and variation in the normal hill of vision. , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.
[4] G. Lindgren,et al. Variability of computerized threshold measurements across the central field in a normal population , 1987 .
[5] J Flammer,et al. Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. , 1986, American journal of ophthalmology.
[6] A Heijl,et al. COMPUTER TEST LOGICS FOR AUTOMATIC PERIMETRY , 1977, Acta ophthalmologica.
[7] J. Dalen. Automated Perimetry in Aviation Medicine , 1983 .
[8] H. Hécaen. Handbook of sensory physiology VII/4, visual psychophysics : Edited by O. Jameson and M. C. Hurvich, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972, 812 pp. D.M. 151.70 , 1973 .
[9] C. Richter. Automatic Perimetry in Glaucoma , 1986 .
[10] B. Bengtsson. The prevalence of glaucoma. , 1981, The British journal of ophthalmology.
[11] Anders Heijl,et al. The Humphrey Field Analyzer: Concepts and Clinical Results , 1985 .
[12] S M Drance,et al. Studies on the effects of age on the central and peripheral isopters of the visual field in normal subjects. , 1967, American journal of ophthalmology.
[13] R. Parrish,et al. Static and kinetic visual field testing. Reproducibility in normal volunteers. , 1984, Archives of ophthalmology.