Elementary Units of Exposure

Most road safety studies rely on summary measures of exposure. The term “summary measure” denotes any aggregate indicator of exposure that does not directly identify and count the number of opportunities for accidents to occur. This paper shows how elementary units of exposure can be developed on the basis of known aggregate measures, such as annual average daily traffic (AADT). An elementary unit of exposure refers to any event that generates an opportunity for an accident to occur. Four such events are identified: (a) encounters (i.e., vehicles passing each other in opposite directions of travel); (b) simultaneous arrivals at points of intersection between potentially conflicting directions of travel, in particular vehicles entering intersections at the same time or within a very short time interval; (c) change of travel lane on multilane highways; and (d) braking or stopping. These events describe traffic movements that occur before a wide range of crash types. The only major group of accidents that is not directly related to particular events is running off the road. The number of events expected to occur for each of the four types identified is estimated on the basis of the following assumptions: (a) AADT is known [when estimating the number of events, mean hourly volume (AADT/24) is used]; (b) vehicles or road users arrive at a point of potential conflict according to a Poisson process; and (c) simultaneous arrivals within a very short time interval (such as 1 s) have the potential to generate a conflict. The number of encounters and simultaneous arrivals in intersections increases considerably faster than AADT. The number of events that may generate conflicts involving lane changes, braking, or stopping increases more slowly than does AADT.

[1]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Crash Prediction Models for Intersections on Rural Multilane Highways , 2007 .

[2]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Two Problems of Averaging Arising in the Estimation of the Relationship Between Accidents and Traffic Flow , 1998 .

[3]  H. Fontaine,et al.  Âge des conducteurs de voiture et accidents de la route: Quel risque pour les seniors ? , 2003 .

[4]  Inmaculada Fierro,et al.  Older drivers, medical condition, medical impairment and crash risk. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  J R Stewart,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF EXPOSURE MEASURES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY ANALYSIS. VOLUME 1. FINAL REPORT , 1987 .

[6]  J R Stewart,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF EXPOSURE MEASURES FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY ANALYSIS. VOLUME 2. FINAL REPORT. APPENDICES , 1987 .

[7]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Safety Models for Urban Four-Lane Undivided Road Segments , 2004 .

[8]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimation of safety at signalized intersections , 1988 .

[9]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Laws of accident causation. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  On exposure and accident rate , 1995 .

[11]  Lasse Fridstrom Econometric Models of Road Use, Accidents, and Road Investment Decisions. Volume I , 1999 .

[12]  Jean-Louis Martin,et al.  Crossover Crashes at Median Strips Equipped with Barriers on a French Motorway Network , 2001 .

[13]  Helene Fontaine DRIVER AGE AND ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS: WHAT IS THE RISK FOR SENIORS? , 2003 .

[14]  Robert Chapman,et al.  The concept of exposure , 1973 .

[15]  Liisa Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  Older drivers do not have a high crash risk--a replication of low mileage bias. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  D. O’Neill,et al.  Driver ageing does not cause higher accident rates per km , 2002 .