The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Practice in the Development of Decision Making in Volleyball Serving

This experiment investigated the effect of explicit, implicit, and sequential learning (implicit-explicit) on the acquisition and retention of decision-making skill in volleyball. The participants were 60 female novices, ages 10 to 12 years. The experimental groups followed three different methods of training: (a) explicit practice for the development of declarative knowledge, (b) implicit practice for the development of the procedural knowledge, (c) sequential practice (implicit first and then explicit), and (d) control group that participated only in the measurements. A pre-test, a post-test, and a retention test measured the response time and accuracy of the decision-making skill. Analysis indicated that all experimental groups improved over time while the control group did not. The sequential group was faster and more accurate than the implicit group, and the latter was faster and more accurate than the explicit one. The sequential group outperformed implicit and explicit groups on both speed and accuracy of decision. It seems that both explicit and implicit processes, when they take place in sequence, interact positively, and this method improves speed and accuracy of decision making rather than when each mode of learning (implicit or explicit) occurs separately. If the role of working memory is reduced at the early stages of learning, the accumulation of declarative knowledge (explicit learning) may benefit from accumulation of procedural knowledge and enhance decision-making skill.

[1]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[2]  Peter A. Frensch,et al.  One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. , 1998 .

[3]  L. Hardy,et al.  State anxiety and motor performance: Testing the conscious processing hypothesis , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  R. Masters Knowledge, knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure , 1992 .

[5]  Yves Rossetti,et al.  Beyond dissociation : interaction between dissociated implicit and explicit processing , 2000 .

[6]  R. Masters,et al.  The role of working memory in motor learning and performance , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[8]  Paul Ward,et al.  The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  J. Maxwell,et al.  The relationship between initial errorless learning conditions and subsequent performance. , 2005, Human movement science.

[10]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[11]  Justin T. Maxwell,et al.  From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  R. Mathews,et al.  Role of Implicit and Explicit Processes in Learning From Examples : A Synergistic Effect , 2004 .

[13]  J. H. Flowers,et al.  Implicit versus explicit learning processes in a probabilistic, continuous fine-motor catching task. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[14]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Implicit learning: Below the subjective threshold , 1997 .

[16]  Murray T. Maybery,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Mental Processes , 1998 .

[17]  R. Masters,et al.  Implicit motor learning, reinvestment and movement disruption : What you don’t know won’t hurt you , 2004 .

[18]  R. Masters,et al.  The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: Evidence from behavioural data , 2006 .

[19]  N. Hodges,et al.  Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[20]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Can anticipatory skills be learned through implicit video based perceptual training? , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Intentional Control of Automatic Stimulus-Response Translation , 2000 .

[22]  A. Williams,et al.  Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice , 2005, Sport & Exercise Psychology Review.

[23]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  A. M. Gentile,et al.  Movement Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes during Acquisition of Functional Skills , 1998 .

[25]  R. Masters,et al.  Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[26]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  A Neuropsychological Theory of Motor Skill Learning , 2004 .

[27]  G. Wulf,et al.  Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: to tell or not to tell.... , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[28]  P. Lewicki,et al.  Nonconscious acquisition of information. , 1992, The American psychologist.

[29]  S. Bennett Implicit learning: Should it be used in practice? , 2000 .

[30]  S. McPherson,et al.  Chapter 9 Knowledge Representation and Decision-Making in Sport , 1993 .

[31]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Development of a Valid Volleyball Skills Test Battery , 1991 .